Froch v Groves Undercard

wadey
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 272
Joined: 01 Sep 2010, 07:00

Froch v Groves Undercard

Post by wadey »

Like myself is anyone starting to get a bit frustrated with the lack of at least one meaningful fight being added to this card yet?

After Eddie stating that he hoped to get at least 1 other world title fight on the card, so far all we have is Anthony Joshua v TBA and Kevin Mitchell v Ghislain Maduma.

With the huge stable of fighters he has, and with the huge income this night is going to generate, in my opinion us fans deserve more?
ILikeBeer
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 10947
Joined: 25 Dec 2004, 07:23

Re: Froch v Groves Undercard

Post by ILikeBeer »

wadey wrote:Like myself is anyone starting to get a bit frustrated with the lack of at least one meaningful fight being added to this card yet?

After Eddie stating that he hoped to get at least 1 other world title fight on the card, so far all we have is Anthony Joshua v TBA and Kevin Mitchell v Ghislain Maduma.

With the huge stable of fighters he has, and with the huge income this night is going to generate, in my opinion us fans deserve more?
Eddie cares more about the money than he cares what the fans deserve. That's the way boxing is these days.
mickey1975
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 23192
Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54

Re: Froch v Groves Undercard

Post by mickey1975 »

Anything spent on the undercard will be a waste to 99% of the fans. It's all about one fight.
MacTavish
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 961
Joined: 20 Apr 2009, 11:03

Re: Froch v Groves Undercard

Post by MacTavish »

It's about Froch Vs Groves IMO....

Less than 8 weeks to go till it's time to 'Get reaaaaaaaaady to rumble"....

:yay:
Boxing Prospect
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 6592
Joined: 25 Jun 2012, 14:35

Re: Froch v Groves Undercard

Post by Boxing Prospect »

ILikeBeer wrote:
wadey wrote:Like myself is anyone starting to get a bit frustrated with the lack of at least one meaningful fight being added to this card yet?

After Eddie stating that he hoped to get at least 1 other world title fight on the card, so far all we have is Anthony Joshua v TBA and Kevin Mitchell v Ghislain Maduma.

With the huge stable of fighters he has, and with the huge income this night is going to generate, in my opinion us fans deserve more?
Eddie cares more about the money than he cares what the fans deserve. That's the way boxing is these days.
Only one promoter I can think of isn't money money money is Ohashi.
ste1983
Middleweight
Posts: 1762
Joined: 01 Oct 2013, 10:30

Re: Froch v Groves Undercard

Post by ste1983 »

why would anyone (after Froch v Kessler 2 and Froch v Groves 1) think that this PPV would have a good undercard.

Eddie wants to please the idiots who will spend £15 and stick it on last minute (after the football or something) to watch Froch v Groves and shout 'hit him' etc.

Eddie doesn't care about real boxing fans he cares about dickheads who jump on bandwagons, like those who don't even like darts but go to his darts shows cuz 'its a good crack aint it'
DMA1987
Cruiserweight
Posts: 2927
Joined: 04 Jun 2011, 17:05

Re: Froch v Groves Undercard

Post by DMA1987 »

Froch Groves certainly wouldn't have been cheap. At least 2 world fights he tried to make fell through. Mcdonnell v Hall due to the Allegedly contract and Vasquez v Mitchell due to a cut.

He sounded like he accepted the first Froch Groves undercard wasn't great and wanted to make this one better, let's see what he does.
Andrew
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 6108
Joined: 17 Jul 2012, 09:31

Re: Froch v Groves Undercard

Post by Andrew »

Mitchell IBF final eliminator
mickey1975
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 23192
Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54

Re: Froch v Groves Undercard

Post by mickey1975 »

Naandrew wrote:Mitchell IBF final eliminator
Crap
TopGun
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 1532
Joined: 24 Jun 2012, 05:27

Re: Froch v Groves Undercard

Post by TopGun »

There needs to be one big domestic dust up on here at least.
expe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 6871
Joined: 07 Oct 2012, 10:10

Re: Froch v Groves Undercard

Post by expe »

TopGun wrote:There needs to be one big domestic dust up on here at least.
I think the main event will do for that one. All I'd like to see is a few good, well matched fights on the bill and no eliminators.
black panther
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4098
Joined: 11 Dec 2003, 07:06

Re: Froch v Groves Undercard

Post by black panther »

Mitchell vs no name opponent with "IBF Eliminator tag" attached.
expe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 6871
Joined: 07 Oct 2012, 10:10

Re: Froch v Groves Undercard

Post by expe »

black panther wrote:Mitchell vs no name opponent with "IBF Eliminator tag" attached.
Ghislain Maduma's flights have already been booked.
heisenberg
Middleweight
Posts: 21
Joined: 11 Oct 2013, 08:06

Re: Froch v Groves Undercard

Post by heisenberg »

If I remember rightly, he said there will only be 4/5 fights on the undercard and they're all big ones....

So we have AJ & Mitchell and another couple to be announced. McDonnell v Hall would be worth watching.

Do you think he would put Woodhouse on there defending for the first time? Might do a split with Coldwell! (dreaming)
DMA1987
Cruiserweight
Posts: 2927
Joined: 04 Jun 2011, 17:05

Re: Froch v Groves Undercard

Post by DMA1987 »

heisenberg wrote:If I remember rightly, he said there will only be 4/5 fights on the undercard and they're all big ones....

So we have AJ & Mitchell and another couple to be announced. McDonnell v Hall would be worth watching.

Do you think he would put Woodhouse on there defending for the first time? Might do a split with Coldwell! (dreaming)
Mcdonnell v Hall isn't happening. He did say AJ would be in with a Skelton/Splott level guy next.
bigB
Cruiserweight
Posts: 470
Joined: 24 Dec 2010, 08:13

Re: Froch v Groves Undercard

Post by bigB »

Mitchell in IBF Final Eliminator

AJ will be in against a Sexton, McDermot, Skelton, Audley type fight

Rocky Fielding vs Paul Smith if his Stieglitz fight isn't agreed

Think Coyle will be in against Woodhouse in Hull so not on show.

Got McDonnell, Yafai & Cardle, Ward, Campbell, Ryder (Maybe Injured) from the stable really.

Rest are on shows in April or May or Scotland one after.

So I have no real clue who else will be on the show.
Last edited by bigB on 08 Apr 2014, 09:31, edited 1 time in total.
black panther
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4098
Joined: 11 Dec 2003, 07:06

Re: Froch v Groves Undercard

Post by black panther »

expe wrote:
black panther wrote:Mitchell vs no name opponent with "IBF Eliminator tag" attached.
Ghislain Maduma's flights have already been booked.
Ghislain Maduma is a no name opponent. His best win is over someone ranked 150th in the world. Yet this qualifies him for the right to fight for the no.1 contender spot? :doh:
Counter-puncher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 39141
Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41

Re: Froch v Groves Undercard

Post by Counter-puncher »

black panther wrote:
expe wrote:
black panther wrote:Mitchell vs no name opponent with "IBF Eliminator tag" attached.
Ghislain Maduma's flights have already been booked.
Ghislain Maduma is a no name opponent. His best win is over someone ranked 150th in the world. Yet this qualifies him for the right to fight for the no.1 contender spot? :doh:
that's why he said that

;;-)
expe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 6871
Joined: 07 Oct 2012, 10:10

Re: Froch v Groves Undercard

Post by expe »

Counter-puncher wrote:
black panther wrote:
expe wrote: Ghislain Maduma's flights have already been booked.
Ghislain Maduma is a no name opponent. His best win is over someone ranked 150th in the world. Yet this qualifies him for the right to fight for the no.1 contender spot? :doh:
that's why he said that

;;-)
:TU:
danamba7
Middleweight
Posts: 2859
Joined: 30 Sep 2013, 09:30

Re: Froch v Groves Undercard

Post by danamba7 »

DMA1987 wrote:Froch Groves certainly wouldn't have been cheap. At least 2 world fights he tried to make fell through. Mcdonnell v Hall due to the Allegedly contract and Vasquez v Mitchell due to a cut.

He sounded like he accepted the first Froch Groves undercard wasn't great and wanted to make this one better, let's see what he does.
Exactly, everyone seems so quick to hammer the undercard before it's even been announced! We're already being blessed with the biggest British fight in yonks! Smith v Fielding, AJ V Sprott etc would satisfy me, seems some people just love to moan!
whiskey
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11956
Joined: 27 Mar 2007, 14:52

Re: Froch v Groves Undercard

Post by whiskey »

I reckon Eddie is going to try and make this a proper all-dayer of fights with a couple of mustard showdowns before the main event.
leforge
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7790
Joined: 04 Mar 2005, 12:44

Re: Froch v Groves Undercard

Post by leforge »

bigB wrote:Mitchell in IBF Final Eliminator

AJ will be in against a Sexton, McDermot, Skelton, Audley type fight

Rocky Fielding vs Paul Smith if his Stieglitz fight isn't agreed

Think Coyle will be in against Woodhouse in Hull so not on show.

Got McDonnell, Yafai & Cardle, Ward, Campbell, Ryder (Maybe Injured) from the stable really.

Rest are on shows in April or May or Scotland one after.

So I have no real clue who else will be on the show.
Fielding v Smith be in Liverpool wasted in London

Ryder not on it.
magnus
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1178
Joined: 13 Dec 2004, 08:59

Re: Froch v Groves Undercard

Post by magnus »

[/quote]

Eddie cares more about the money than he cares what the fans deserve. That's the way boxing is these days.[/quote]

As opposed to the good old days when promoters didn't want to make big profits I assume?
Taansend
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 12078
Joined: 10 Jul 2004, 17:38

Re: Froch v Groves Undercard

Post by Taansend »

G0mez wrote:I reckon Eddie is going to try and make this a proper all-dayer of fights with a couple of mustard showdowns before the main event.
I agree, mate. This is not just about Froch v Groves but also about Eddie Hearns legacy on the sport. If the undercard is shite & the main event fails for whatever reason he'll be as pissed off as anyone.

He genuinely loves the sport & his place in it. He seems like a kid on Chrimbo morning.
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: Froch v Groves Undercard

Post by lefty »

Taansend wrote:
G0mez wrote:I reckon Eddie is going to try and make this a proper all-dayer of fights with a couple of mustard showdowns before the main event.
I agree, mate. This is not just about Froch v Groves but also about Eddie Hearns legacy on the sport. If the undercard is shite & the main event fails for whatever reason he'll be as pissed off as anyone.

He genuinely loves the sport & his place in it. He seems like a kid on Chrimbo morning.
He loves the pound note more than he loves the sport.
Post Reply