Froch v Groves Undercard
Froch v Groves Undercard
Like myself is anyone starting to get a bit frustrated with the lack of at least one meaningful fight being added to this card yet?
After Eddie stating that he hoped to get at least 1 other world title fight on the card, so far all we have is Anthony Joshua v TBA and Kevin Mitchell v Ghislain Maduma.
With the huge stable of fighters he has, and with the huge income this night is going to generate, in my opinion us fans deserve more?
After Eddie stating that he hoped to get at least 1 other world title fight on the card, so far all we have is Anthony Joshua v TBA and Kevin Mitchell v Ghislain Maduma.
With the huge stable of fighters he has, and with the huge income this night is going to generate, in my opinion us fans deserve more?
Re: Froch v Groves Undercard
Eddie cares more about the money than he cares what the fans deserve. That's the way boxing is these days.wadey wrote:Like myself is anyone starting to get a bit frustrated with the lack of at least one meaningful fight being added to this card yet?
After Eddie stating that he hoped to get at least 1 other world title fight on the card, so far all we have is Anthony Joshua v TBA and Kevin Mitchell v Ghislain Maduma.
With the huge stable of fighters he has, and with the huge income this night is going to generate, in my opinion us fans deserve more?
-
mickey1975
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 23192
- Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54
Re: Froch v Groves Undercard
Anything spent on the undercard will be a waste to 99% of the fans. It's all about one fight.
Re: Froch v Groves Undercard
It's about Froch Vs Groves IMO....
Less than 8 weeks to go till it's time to 'Get reaaaaaaaaady to rumble"....

Less than 8 weeks to go till it's time to 'Get reaaaaaaaaady to rumble"....
-
Boxing Prospect
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 6592
- Joined: 25 Jun 2012, 14:35
Re: Froch v Groves Undercard
Only one promoter I can think of isn't money money money is Ohashi.ILikeBeer wrote:Eddie cares more about the money than he cares what the fans deserve. That's the way boxing is these days.wadey wrote:Like myself is anyone starting to get a bit frustrated with the lack of at least one meaningful fight being added to this card yet?
After Eddie stating that he hoped to get at least 1 other world title fight on the card, so far all we have is Anthony Joshua v TBA and Kevin Mitchell v Ghislain Maduma.
With the huge stable of fighters he has, and with the huge income this night is going to generate, in my opinion us fans deserve more?
Re: Froch v Groves Undercard
why would anyone (after Froch v Kessler 2 and Froch v Groves 1) think that this PPV would have a good undercard.
Eddie wants to please the idiots who will spend £15 and stick it on last minute (after the football or something) to watch Froch v Groves and shout 'hit him' etc.
Eddie doesn't care about real boxing fans he cares about dickheads who jump on bandwagons, like those who don't even like darts but go to his darts shows cuz 'its a good crack aint it'
Eddie wants to please the idiots who will spend £15 and stick it on last minute (after the football or something) to watch Froch v Groves and shout 'hit him' etc.
Eddie doesn't care about real boxing fans he cares about dickheads who jump on bandwagons, like those who don't even like darts but go to his darts shows cuz 'its a good crack aint it'
Re: Froch v Groves Undercard
Froch Groves certainly wouldn't have been cheap. At least 2 world fights he tried to make fell through. Mcdonnell v Hall due to the Allegedly contract and Vasquez v Mitchell due to a cut.
He sounded like he accepted the first Froch Groves undercard wasn't great and wanted to make this one better, let's see what he does.
He sounded like he accepted the first Froch Groves undercard wasn't great and wanted to make this one better, let's see what he does.
Re: Froch v Groves Undercard
Mitchell IBF final eliminator
-
mickey1975
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 23192
- Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54
Re: Froch v Groves Undercard
CrapNaandrew wrote:Mitchell IBF final eliminator
Re: Froch v Groves Undercard
There needs to be one big domestic dust up on here at least.
Re: Froch v Groves Undercard
I think the main event will do for that one. All I'd like to see is a few good, well matched fights on the bill and no eliminators.TopGun wrote:There needs to be one big domestic dust up on here at least.
-
black panther
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 4098
- Joined: 11 Dec 2003, 07:06
Re: Froch v Groves Undercard
Mitchell vs no name opponent with "IBF Eliminator tag" attached.
Re: Froch v Groves Undercard
Ghislain Maduma's flights have already been booked.black panther wrote:Mitchell vs no name opponent with "IBF Eliminator tag" attached.
-
heisenberg
- Middleweight
- Posts: 21
- Joined: 11 Oct 2013, 08:06
Re: Froch v Groves Undercard
If I remember rightly, he said there will only be 4/5 fights on the undercard and they're all big ones....
So we have AJ & Mitchell and another couple to be announced. McDonnell v Hall would be worth watching.
Do you think he would put Woodhouse on there defending for the first time? Might do a split with Coldwell! (dreaming)
So we have AJ & Mitchell and another couple to be announced. McDonnell v Hall would be worth watching.
Do you think he would put Woodhouse on there defending for the first time? Might do a split with Coldwell! (dreaming)
Re: Froch v Groves Undercard
Mcdonnell v Hall isn't happening. He did say AJ would be in with a Skelton/Splott level guy next.heisenberg wrote:If I remember rightly, he said there will only be 4/5 fights on the undercard and they're all big ones....
So we have AJ & Mitchell and another couple to be announced. McDonnell v Hall would be worth watching.
Do you think he would put Woodhouse on there defending for the first time? Might do a split with Coldwell! (dreaming)
Re: Froch v Groves Undercard
Mitchell in IBF Final Eliminator
AJ will be in against a Sexton, McDermot, Skelton, Audley type fight
Rocky Fielding vs Paul Smith if his Stieglitz fight isn't agreed
Think Coyle will be in against Woodhouse in Hull so not on show.
Got McDonnell, Yafai & Cardle, Ward, Campbell, Ryder (Maybe Injured) from the stable really.
Rest are on shows in April or May or Scotland one after.
So I have no real clue who else will be on the show.
AJ will be in against a Sexton, McDermot, Skelton, Audley type fight
Rocky Fielding vs Paul Smith if his Stieglitz fight isn't agreed
Think Coyle will be in against Woodhouse in Hull so not on show.
Got McDonnell, Yafai & Cardle, Ward, Campbell, Ryder (Maybe Injured) from the stable really.
Rest are on shows in April or May or Scotland one after.
So I have no real clue who else will be on the show.
Last edited by bigB on 08 Apr 2014, 09:31, edited 1 time in total.
-
black panther
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 4098
- Joined: 11 Dec 2003, 07:06
Re: Froch v Groves Undercard
Ghislain Maduma is a no name opponent. His best win is over someone ranked 150th in the world. Yet this qualifies him for the right to fight for the no.1 contender spot?expe wrote:Ghislain Maduma's flights have already been booked.black panther wrote:Mitchell vs no name opponent with "IBF Eliminator tag" attached.
-
Counter-puncher
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 39141
- Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41
Re: Froch v Groves Undercard
that's why he said thatblack panther wrote:Ghislain Maduma is a no name opponent. His best win is over someone ranked 150th in the world. Yet this qualifies him for the right to fight for the no.1 contender spot?expe wrote:Ghislain Maduma's flights have already been booked.black panther wrote:Mitchell vs no name opponent with "IBF Eliminator tag" attached.
;;-)
Re: Froch v Groves Undercard
Counter-puncher wrote:that's why he said thatblack panther wrote:Ghislain Maduma is a no name opponent. His best win is over someone ranked 150th in the world. Yet this qualifies him for the right to fight for the no.1 contender spot?expe wrote: Ghislain Maduma's flights have already been booked.
;;-)
Re: Froch v Groves Undercard
Exactly, everyone seems so quick to hammer the undercard before it's even been announced! We're already being blessed with the biggest British fight in yonks! Smith v Fielding, AJ V Sprott etc would satisfy me, seems some people just love to moan!DMA1987 wrote:Froch Groves certainly wouldn't have been cheap. At least 2 world fights he tried to make fell through. Mcdonnell v Hall due to the Allegedly contract and Vasquez v Mitchell due to a cut.
He sounded like he accepted the first Froch Groves undercard wasn't great and wanted to make this one better, let's see what he does.
Re: Froch v Groves Undercard
I reckon Eddie is going to try and make this a proper all-dayer of fights with a couple of mustard showdowns before the main event.
Re: Froch v Groves Undercard
Fielding v Smith be in Liverpool wasted in LondonbigB wrote:Mitchell in IBF Final Eliminator
AJ will be in against a Sexton, McDermot, Skelton, Audley type fight
Rocky Fielding vs Paul Smith if his Stieglitz fight isn't agreed
Think Coyle will be in against Woodhouse in Hull so not on show.
Got McDonnell, Yafai & Cardle, Ward, Campbell, Ryder (Maybe Injured) from the stable really.
Rest are on shows in April or May or Scotland one after.
So I have no real clue who else will be on the show.
Ryder not on it.
Re: Froch v Groves Undercard
[/quote]
Eddie cares more about the money than he cares what the fans deserve. That's the way boxing is these days.[/quote]
As opposed to the good old days when promoters didn't want to make big profits I assume?
Eddie cares more about the money than he cares what the fans deserve. That's the way boxing is these days.[/quote]
As opposed to the good old days when promoters didn't want to make big profits I assume?
Re: Froch v Groves Undercard
I agree, mate. This is not just about Froch v Groves but also about Eddie Hearns legacy on the sport. If the undercard is shite & the main event fails for whatever reason he'll be as pissed off as anyone.G0mez wrote:I reckon Eddie is going to try and make this a proper all-dayer of fights with a couple of mustard showdowns before the main event.
He genuinely loves the sport & his place in it. He seems like a kid on Chrimbo morning.
Re: Froch v Groves Undercard
He loves the pound note more than he loves the sport.Taansend wrote:I agree, mate. This is not just about Froch v Groves but also about Eddie Hearns legacy on the sport. If the undercard is shite & the main event fails for whatever reason he'll be as pissed off as anyone.G0mez wrote:I reckon Eddie is going to try and make this a proper all-dayer of fights with a couple of mustard showdowns before the main event.
He genuinely loves the sport & his place in it. He seems like a kid on Chrimbo morning.