Conquest vs Mckenzie RBR

lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Conquest vs Mckenzie RBR

Post by lefty »

Really dont think much of Georgie boy.
expe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 6871
Joined: 07 Oct 2012, 10:10

Re: Conquest vs Mckenzie RBR

Post by expe »

columbo wrote:Really dont think much of Georgie boy.
I've given both rounds to Warburton, looks like he really fancies it tonight.
jameswilson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13502
Joined: 08 Jan 2004, 18:01

Re: Conquest vs Mckenzie RBR

Post by jameswilson »

I'm just catching up on the Price v Pala fight on youtube. Has anything of note happened?
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: Conquest vs Mckenzie RBR

Post by lefty »

jameswilson wrote:I'm just catching up on the Price v Pala fight on youtube. Has anything of note happened?
Kean being over keen (pardon the pun) and getting hit a lot in the process! Doesnt seem to have much defensive nous and he doesnt seem to hit particularily hard either.
expe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 6871
Joined: 07 Oct 2012, 10:10

Re: Conquest vs Mckenzie RBR

Post by expe »

jameswilson wrote:I'm just catching up on the Price v Pala fight on youtube. Has anything of note happened?
I have Georgie Kean down 30-27 to Will Warburton, with a round to go.
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: Conquest vs Mckenzie RBR

Post by lefty »

Warburton has got pretty good skills. Shows journeyman arent all 'bums' as is thought quite often.
Boxing Prospect
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 6592
Joined: 25 Jun 2012, 14:35

Re: Conquest vs Mckenzie RBR

Post by Boxing Prospect »

Yay the Keane hype surely has to stop now?
TerribleTerry
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5272
Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 12:30

Re: Conquest vs Mckenzie RBR

Post by TerribleTerry »

Glad to see the ref got it right despite Kean being a big ticket seller.
ShadrachSimmo
Cruiserweight
Posts: 4738
Joined: 20 Oct 2010, 05:42

Re: Conquest vs Mckenzie RBR

Post by ShadrachSimmo »

Warburton wins 39-38 and rightly so.

Kean looked very easy to hit.
expe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 6871
Joined: 07 Oct 2012, 10:10

Re: Conquest vs Mckenzie RBR

Post by expe »

Barry Jones has it 38-38, I've given it to Warburton 39-37...

And Warburton gets it 39-38, well deserved win for him, one of those fighters that you wonder what might have been if he could sell a few tickets, or if a big promoter had got hold of him early on in his career.
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: Conquest vs Mckenzie RBR

Post by lefty »

expe wrote:Barry Jones has it 38-38, I've given it to Warburton 39-37...

And Warburton gets it 39-38, well deserved win for him, one of those fighters that you wonder what might have been if he could sell a few tickets, or if a big promoter had got hold of him early on in his career.
He probably makes a better living now than he would if he'd been managed like that though to be honest.
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: Conquest vs Mckenzie RBR

Post by lefty »

I read that Andy Lee looked like crap tonight by the way?
Black Sam Bellamy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1476
Joined: 25 Sep 2008, 13:51

Re: Conquest vs Mckenzie RBR

Post by Black Sam Bellamy »

Kean needs to get fitter and cut his fringe off.
expe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 6871
Joined: 07 Oct 2012, 10:10

Re: Conquest vs Mckenzie RBR

Post by expe »

columbo wrote:
expe wrote:Barry Jones has it 38-38, I've given it to Warburton 39-37...

And Warburton gets it 39-38, well deserved win for him, one of those fighters that you wonder what might have been if he could sell a few tickets, or if a big promoter had got hold of him early on in his career.
He probably makes a better living now than he would if he'd been managed like that though to be honest.
Early on his career he probably did better, but I don't think it's out of the question that he could have made it to title level and at that point the money would probably be better and there's still the option of going down the journeyman route later on to keep earning.
expe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 6871
Joined: 07 Oct 2012, 10:10

Re: Conquest vs Mckenzie RBR

Post by expe »

columbo wrote:I read that Andy Lee looked like crap tonight by the way?
76-76, 77-76, 77-76 MD win against Frank Haroche Horta.
broomy7s
Cruiserweight
Posts: 971
Joined: 19 May 2011, 07:53

Re: Conquest vs Mckenzie RBR

Post by broomy7s »

Glad Warburton didn't get robbed. Was worried when heard 39-38. That's a couple of decent wins for Warburton this year.
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: Conquest vs Mckenzie RBR

Post by lefty »

expe wrote:
columbo wrote:I read that Andy Lee looked like crap tonight by the way?
76-76, 77-76, 77-76 MD win against Frank Haroche Horta.
Dunno what to make of Lee! He's got skills I think but seems to end up struggling against guys he shouldnt. Was that at middleweight by the way? I read somewhere that Lee was going down to light middle? I'm a bit out of the loop at the moment.
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: Conquest vs Mckenzie RBR

Post by lefty »

(No homo) Buglioni has a great physique.
JC
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4588
Joined: 07 Jan 2004, 13:04

Re: Conquest vs Mckenzie RBR

Post by JC »

Feck me his fans are annoying.

It's like the Ladybird Book of Football Chants
Old bones Ian
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11811
Joined: 13 Jul 2004, 07:33

Re: Conquest vs Mckenzie RBR

Post by Old bones Ian »

columbo wrote:(No homo) Buglioni has a great physique.
Wit Woo :D We're all men here
expe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 6871
Joined: 07 Oct 2012, 10:10

Re: Conquest vs Mckenzie RBR

Post by expe »

columbo wrote:
expe wrote:
columbo wrote:I read that Andy Lee looked like crap tonight by the way?
76-76, 77-76, 77-76 MD win against Frank Haroche Horta.
Dunno what to make of Lee! He's got skills I think but seems to end up struggling against guys he shouldnt. Was that at middleweight by the way? I read somewhere that Lee was going down to light middle? I'm a bit out of the loop at the moment.
11st 2lbs, Lee is going down to light middle, I'd expect the next fight to be for a title of some sort at 11st.
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: Conquest vs Mckenzie RBR

Post by lefty »

expe wrote:
columbo wrote: Dunno what to make of Lee! He's got skills I think but seems to end up struggling against guys he shouldnt. Was that at middleweight by the way? I read somewhere that Lee was going down to light middle? I'm a bit out of the loop at the moment.
11st 2lbs, Lee is going down to light middle, I'd expect the next fight to be for a title of some sort at 11st.
[/quote]
why the hell is he going down to light middle at this stage of his career?! Doesnt make a lot of sense that.
jameswilson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13502
Joined: 08 Jan 2004, 18:01

Re: Conquest vs Mckenzie RBR

Post by jameswilson »

columbo wrote: why the hell is he going down to light middle at this stage of his career?! Doesnt make a lot of sense that.
Well if he can make the weight without feeling drained surely it's better, regardless of what stage he is at in his career. He might have just suddenly lost 5 or 6 pounds naturally.
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: Conquest vs Mckenzie RBR

Post by lefty »

jameswilson wrote:
columbo wrote: why the hell is he going down to light middle at this stage of his career?! Doesnt make a lot of sense that.
Well if he can make the weight without feeling drained surely it's better, regardless of what stage he is at in his career. He might have just suddenly lost 5 or 6 pounds naturally.
Yeah but why didnt he do that before? Just seems odd. Also it's probably gonna affect his punch resistance.
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: Conquest vs Mckenzie RBR

Post by lefty »

Buglioni is a hype job aswell.
Post Reply