Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
This ain't Zab, Paulie.
How awful is Judah? I mean seriously. He sucks.
How awful is Judah? I mean seriously. He sucks.
Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
WHOA! I wasn't expecting a stoppage in this one, but after that 2nd round it looks like a stoppage in Porter's favor is a very real possibility. He was hammering Paulie in the 2nd.
2-0 Porter, you could argue that 2nd was a 10-8 round for him.
2-0 Porter, you could argue that 2nd was a 10-8 round for him.
-
No Tomorrow
- Heavyweight

Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
Exaggeration much?diddy wrote:How awful is Judah? I mean seriously. He sucks.
Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
This fight is over.
Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
Malignaggi is getting the shit beaten out of him here.
Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
Yeah. I was just about to say Porter is kicking his ass even worse than Khan or Hatton did.columbo wrote:Malignaggi is getting the poo beaten out of him here.
Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
Ref might stop this eventually. Round 10 or so.
Or round 4.
Or round 4.
Last edited by diddy on 19 Apr 2014, 23:06, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
Knockdown.
Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
Be very interesting to see how keen Brook will be if this continues
Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
It's over. Porter just destroyed him.
Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
Malignaggi got fornicating brutalised there! Good luck Kell.
Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
Porter KO 4. Very Impressive performance!!!
Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
Once again. Zab blows. And so does Broner.
Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
Does anyone think Porter has a bit of a Aaron Pryor vibe about him? Not trying to say he's anywhere as good by the way.
Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
Malignaggi might retire after that one. That's about as bad as it gets. Definitely the worst he's ever been beaten.columbo wrote:Malignaggi got effing brutalised there! Good luck Kell.
Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
I think Zab was always somewhat overrated but he's also shot to be fair.diddy wrote:Once again. Zab blows. And so does Broner.
-
Baby Face Finster
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 17243
- Joined: 29 Dec 2004, 23:34
Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
Porter beat the crap out of Paulie but he is one dirty fighter. He used a lot of elbows and pushed off a lot.
Porter is really good but he will never be the elite of the division.
Porter is really good but he will never be the elite of the division.
Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
Whilst not a huge puncher, I think Porter hits harder than his record suggests. He rocked Alexander numerous times in their fight and Paulie normally has a very good chin.gilgamesh wrote:Malignaggi might retire after that one. That's about as bad as it gets. Definitely the worst he's ever been beaten.columbo wrote:Malignaggi got effing brutalised there! Good luck Kell.
-
No Tomorrow
- Heavyweight

Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
WOW. I was just going to post that a couple minutes ago and pulled up Google images of them to view the similarities. Porter to me is a jacked Pryorcolumbo wrote:Does anyone think Porter has a bit of a Aaron Pryor vibe about him? Not trying to say he's anywhere as good by the way.
-
Baby Face Finster
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 17243
- Joined: 29 Dec 2004, 23:34
Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
Paulie kept backing up with his head straight up. He was open for the left hook all night long.columbo wrote:Whilst not a huge puncher, I think Porter hits harder than his record suggests. He rocked Alexander numerous times in their fight and Paulie normally has a very good chin.gilgamesh wrote:Malignaggi might retire after that one. That's about as bad as it gets. Definitely the worst he's ever been beaten.columbo wrote:Malignaggi got effing brutalised there! Good luck Kell.
Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
I dont think it was that dirty. They both had an arm free on the inside and Porter was making the most of it. Paulie just couldnt handle it.Baby Face Finster wrote:Porter beat the crap out of Paulie but he is one dirty fighter. He used a lot of elbows and pushed off a lot.
Porter is really good but he will never be the elite of the division.
Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
Oh i agree. He still normally has a solid beard though.Baby Face Finster wrote:Paulie kept backing up with his head straight up. He was open for the left hook all night long.columbo wrote:Whilst not a huge puncher, I think Porter hits harder than his record suggests. He rocked Alexander numerous times in their fight and Paulie normally has a very good chin.gilgamesh wrote:
Malignaggi might retire after that one. That's about as bad as it gets. Definitely the worst he's ever been beaten.
Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
Porter vs. Thurman? Anyone
-
No Tomorrow
- Heavyweight

Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
Dude call them out. You could probably get a lot of money facing them. Shouldn't be harddiddy wrote:Once again. Zab blows. And so does Broner.