Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)

For RBR threads only
diddy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4900
Joined: 14 Apr 2009, 01:42

Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)

Post by diddy »

This ain't Zab, Paulie.

How awful is Judah? I mean seriously. He sucks.
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46246
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)

Post by gilgamesh »

WHOA! I wasn't expecting a stoppage in this one, but after that 2nd round it looks like a stoppage in Porter's favor is a very real possibility. He was hammering Paulie in the 2nd.

2-0 Porter, you could argue that 2nd was a 10-8 round for him.
No Tomorrow
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)

Post by No Tomorrow »

diddy wrote:How awful is Judah? I mean seriously. He sucks.
Exaggeration much?
diddy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4900
Joined: 14 Apr 2009, 01:42

Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)

Post by diddy »

This fight is over.
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)

Post by lefty »

Malignaggi is getting the shit beaten out of him here.
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46246
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)

Post by gilgamesh »

columbo wrote:Malignaggi is getting the poo beaten out of him here.
Yeah. I was just about to say Porter is kicking his ass even worse than Khan or Hatton did.
diddy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4900
Joined: 14 Apr 2009, 01:42

Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)

Post by diddy »

Ref might stop this eventually. Round 10 or so.

Or round 4.
Last edited by diddy on 19 Apr 2014, 23:06, edited 1 time in total.
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)

Post by lefty »

Knockdown.
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)

Post by lefty »

Be very interesting to see how keen Brook will be if this continues
MachoTime
Middleweight
Posts: 1420
Joined: 18 Nov 2013, 02:13

Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)

Post by MachoTime »

It's over. Porter just destroyed him.
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)

Post by lefty »

Malignaggi got fornicating brutalised there! Good luck Kell.
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46246
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)

Post by gilgamesh »

Porter KO 4. Very Impressive performance!!!
No Tomorrow
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)

Post by No Tomorrow »

That's awesome. Go Porter
diddy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4900
Joined: 14 Apr 2009, 01:42

Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)

Post by diddy »

Once again. Zab blows. And so does Broner.
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)

Post by lefty »

Does anyone think Porter has a bit of a Aaron Pryor vibe about him? Not trying to say he's anywhere as good by the way.
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46246
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)

Post by gilgamesh »

columbo wrote:Malignaggi got effing brutalised there! Good luck Kell.
Malignaggi might retire after that one. That's about as bad as it gets. Definitely the worst he's ever been beaten.
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)

Post by lefty »

diddy wrote:Once again. Zab blows. And so does Broner.
I think Zab was always somewhat overrated but he's also shot to be fair.
Baby Face Finster
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 17243
Joined: 29 Dec 2004, 23:34

Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)

Post by Baby Face Finster »

Porter beat the crap out of Paulie but he is one dirty fighter. He used a lot of elbows and pushed off a lot.

Porter is really good but he will never be the elite of the division.
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)

Post by lefty »

gilgamesh wrote:
columbo wrote:Malignaggi got effing brutalised there! Good luck Kell.
Malignaggi might retire after that one. That's about as bad as it gets. Definitely the worst he's ever been beaten.
Whilst not a huge puncher, I think Porter hits harder than his record suggests. He rocked Alexander numerous times in their fight and Paulie normally has a very good chin.
No Tomorrow
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)

Post by No Tomorrow »

columbo wrote:Does anyone think Porter has a bit of a Aaron Pryor vibe about him? Not trying to say he's anywhere as good by the way.
WOW. I was just going to post that a couple minutes ago and pulled up Google images of them to view the similarities. Porter to me is a jacked Pryor
Baby Face Finster
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 17243
Joined: 29 Dec 2004, 23:34

Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)

Post by Baby Face Finster »

columbo wrote:
gilgamesh wrote:
columbo wrote:Malignaggi got effing brutalised there! Good luck Kell.
Malignaggi might retire after that one. That's about as bad as it gets. Definitely the worst he's ever been beaten.
Whilst not a huge puncher, I think Porter hits harder than his record suggests. He rocked Alexander numerous times in their fight and Paulie normally has a very good chin.
Paulie kept backing up with his head straight up. He was open for the left hook all night long.
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)

Post by lefty »

Baby Face Finster wrote:Porter beat the crap out of Paulie but he is one dirty fighter. He used a lot of elbows and pushed off a lot.

Porter is really good but he will never be the elite of the division.
I dont think it was that dirty. They both had an arm free on the inside and Porter was making the most of it. Paulie just couldnt handle it.
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)

Post by lefty »

Baby Face Finster wrote:
columbo wrote:
gilgamesh wrote:
Malignaggi might retire after that one. That's about as bad as it gets. Definitely the worst he's ever been beaten.
Whilst not a huge puncher, I think Porter hits harder than his record suggests. He rocked Alexander numerous times in their fight and Paulie normally has a very good chin.
Paulie kept backing up with his head straight up. He was open for the left hook all night long.
Oh i agree. He still normally has a solid beard though.
MachoTime
Middleweight
Posts: 1420
Joined: 18 Nov 2013, 02:13

Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)

Post by MachoTime »

Porter vs. Thurman? Anyone
No Tomorrow
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)

Post by No Tomorrow »

diddy wrote:Once again. Zab blows. And so does Broner.
Dude call them out. You could probably get a lot of money facing them. Shouldn't be hard
Post Reply