Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)

For RBR threads only
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)

Post by crusader »

holy fornicating shitt
expe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 6871
Joined: 07 Oct 2012, 10:10

Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)

Post by expe »

Shumenov's bought the fight, split decision, ridiculous.

Hopkins gets it, but those judges have been paid off, Shumenov's backers have been upto something. 116-111 Hopkins is bad enough, but 114-113 Shumenov, no wonder he didn't bother to do anything, probably thought he had the fight in the bag with the judges.
giacomino
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 15482
Joined: 14 Dec 2007, 19:33

Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)

Post by giacomino »

Think the Campillo fight
JCS
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6243
Joined: 17 Dec 2004, 13:27

Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)

Post by JCS »

118-109 here, hahahha. split
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46258
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)

Post by gilgamesh »

columbo wrote:
gilgamesh wrote:
diddy wrote:I don't like Bernard's chances against Adonis. Just being honest.
I think he'd still be able to make it ugly, and difficult for Stevenson. I wouldn't be shocked if he beat him.
I think Stevenson would put him on his ass.
He might. I don't think so though.
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)

Post by lefty »

Hasnt Shumenov got some very wealthy connections and his family are very wealthy
Baby Face Finster
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 17244
Joined: 29 Dec 2004, 23:34

Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)

Post by Baby Face Finster »

I don't know if it means anything or not but Bernard thanked everyone but Oscar.
ikorolev
Middleweight
Posts: 4895
Joined: 21 Sep 2013, 19:08

Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)

Post by ikorolev »

Baby Face Finster wrote:More joke scoring. How the hell could a judge score that fight for Shumenov?
Easily if he was bribed or threatened.
JeanClaude Van Damme
Middleweight
Posts: 188
Joined: 29 Nov 2013, 00:55

Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)

Post by JeanClaude Van Damme »

Baby Face Finster wrote:
JeanClaude Van Damme wrote:Joe still got dropped by an old man.
And still won.



Yeah, in a split decision. As evidenced by tonights scorecards, judges are retarded. AP, ESPN and Yahoo all scored it for Hopkins.
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)

Post by crusader »

I thought Calzaghe clearly beat Hopkins. Bernard gets way too much credit for his supposed effectiveness in that fight.
JCS
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6243
Joined: 17 Dec 2004, 13:27

Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)

Post by JCS »

Calzaghe/Hopkins was anybody's fight.

The fact tonight's fight was a split was gross.
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)

Post by crusader »

Ya, BHOP gets outlanded by about 100 punches, but hey, he's crafty and all that.
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46258
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)

Post by gilgamesh »

JCS wrote:Calzaghe/Hopkins was anybody's fight.

The fact tonight's fight was a split was gross.
Yeah it was absurd.
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)

Post by lefty »

Hmm very interesting that Hopkins didnt mention Oscar once there but yet highly praised Schaefer and co.
diddy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4900
Joined: 14 Apr 2009, 01:42

Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)

Post by diddy »

Lol at that Chris Byrd/Bob Marley looking mute behind Be Butt.
Baby Face Finster
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 17244
Joined: 29 Dec 2004, 23:34

Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)

Post by Baby Face Finster »

JeanClaude Van Damme wrote:
Baby Face Finster wrote:
JeanClaude Van Damme wrote:Joe still got dropped by an old man.
And still won.



Yeah, in a split decision. As evidenced by tonights scorecards, judges are retarded. AP, ESPN and Yahoo all scored it for Hopkins.
Yahoo. LMAO. You lost all credibility quoting Yahoo.
JCS
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6243
Joined: 17 Dec 2004, 13:27

Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)

Post by JCS »

diddy wrote:Lol at that Chris Byrd/Bob Marley looking mute behind Be Butt.
Dick James?
big train express
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 154
Joined: 19 Jun 2006, 00:28

Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)

Post by big train express »

bhop continuing to dominate is a testament to how great and underrated joe calzaghe really is
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)

Post by crusader »

The guy is Dewey Cooper I think. He was a world champion kicboxer and I think he went 19-3 as a pro boxer.
Baby Face Finster
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 17244
Joined: 29 Dec 2004, 23:34

Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)

Post by Baby Face Finster »

big train express wrote:bhop continuing to dominate is a testament to how great and underrated joe calzaghe really is
Was.
Jaywheel
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2694
Joined: 19 Mar 2008, 12:14

Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)

Post by Jaywheel »

funny voice this shumenov dude... :lol:
MachoTime
Middleweight
Posts: 1420
Joined: 18 Nov 2013, 02:13

Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)

Post by MachoTime »

columbo wrote:Hmm very interesting that Hopkins didnt mention Oscar once there but yet highly praised Schaefer and co.
Isn't Oscar like a lame duck as far as promoting goes. They just use his name..all the other's do the grunt work.
Baby Face Finster
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 17244
Joined: 29 Dec 2004, 23:34

Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)

Post by Baby Face Finster »

MachoTime wrote:
columbo wrote:Hmm very interesting that Hopkins didnt mention Oscar once there but yet highly praised Schaefer and co.
Isn't Oscar like a lame duck as far as promoting goes. They just use his name..all the other's do the grunt work.
Oscar is the one who brought Hopkins into HIS promotion.
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)

Post by lefty »

MachoTime wrote:
columbo wrote:Hmm very interesting that Hopkins didnt mention Oscar once there but yet highly praised Schaefer and co.
Isn't Oscar like a lame duck as far as promoting goes. They just use his name..all the other's do the grunt work.
That's the impression I get. I dont think Oscar does anything aside from snorting a ton of coke and shagging whores most likely from the proceeds of the business :lol:
Last edited by lefty on 20 Apr 2014, 00:33, edited 1 time in total.
big train express
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 154
Joined: 19 Jun 2006, 00:28

Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)

Post by big train express »

Baby Face Finster wrote:
big train express wrote:bhop continuing to dominate is a testament to how great and underrated joe calzaghe really is
Was.
hes still great and underrated. resumes dont change with age.
Post Reply