'Villains' - which British boxers were seen as the bad guy?
-
mickey1975
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 23193
- Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54
Re: 'Villains' - which British boxers were seen as the bad guy?
Froch in the rematch! Got a feeling it's going to be very pro Groves.
Re: 'Villains' - which British boxers were seen as the bad guy?
Lewis in the run up to Bruno fight
-
TerribleTerry
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 5272
- Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 12:30
Re: 'Villains' - which British boxers were seen as the bad guy?
Good shout.littlepug wrote:Lewis in the run up to Bruno fight
It is easy to forget how genuinely suspicious most of the UK general public were of this 'Canadian' called Lewis when he first came back to the UK to launch his pro career.
Many saw it as a cynical marketing exercise.
It wasn't until he was successful on the world stage that the British public began to warm to Lewis...
-
stevieb_8006
- Heavyweight

Re: 'Villains' - which British boxers were seen as the bad guy?
Michael gomez played the villain well
Re: 'Villains' - which British boxers were seen as the bad guy?
Esham Pickering
-
mickey1975
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 23193
- Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54
Re: 'Villains' - which British boxers were seen as the bad guy?
He was very popular! I think the topic means fighters who were actually disliked.stevieb_8006 wrote:Michael gomez played the villain well
Re: 'Villains' - which British boxers were seen as the bad guy?
Thanks. I just thought of Richardson as I was just thinking back to the years before bravado and boasting became practically the norm and so I wondered what if anything might have made a large portion of the public want a boxer to lose back then. I guess a dirty fighter would have had to have been really dirty to have been seen as the panto villain.misterpunch wrote:DICK RICHARDSON wasn't really disliked by the british boxing public. he wasn't an angel in the ring (a bit of dirty fighter) but they didn't get on his back as far as I remember. brian London was disliked more around that time because he was regarded - rightly or wrongly - as a guy that didn't try to win and would too easily cave in.Cholo_cws wrote:Yes, Chisora. I didn't think of him.
I used the term dislike loosely. Maybe unpopular is better.
Anybody know or remember how Dick Richardson was viewed? I believe he had his fair share of controversies in the ring.
-
danconnollyeire
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 3576
- Joined: 24 May 2012, 10:31
Re: 'Villains' - which British boxers were seen as the bad guy?
Lennox vs Bruno
Mayweather vs most
Fury and Chisora of late
Mayweather vs most
Fury and Chisora of late
Re: 'Villains' - which British boxers were seen as the bad guy?
Audley must fit in with some sort of pantomine role!
-
stevieb_8006
- Heavyweight

Re: 'Villains' - which British boxers were seen as the bad guy?
Oh hes was popular alright, but played the bad guy to an absolute tee.mickey1975 wrote:He was very popular! I think the topic means fighters who were actually disliked.stevieb_8006 wrote:Michael gomez played the villain well
Re: 'Villains' - which British boxers were seen as the bad guy?
Michael Gomez is a legend in my eye s
Re: 'Villains' - which British boxers were seen as the bad guy?
tear up wrote:Esham Pickering
-
misterpunch
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 1252
- Joined: 13 Jan 2012, 17:48
Re: 'Villains' - which British boxers were seen as the bad guy?
that's about rightCholo_cws wrote:Thanks. I just thought of Richardson as I was just thinking back to the years before bravado and boasting became practically the norm and so I wondered what if anything might have made a large portion of the public want a boxer to lose back then. I guess a dirty fighter would have had to have been really dirty to have been seen as the panto villain.misterpunch wrote:DICK RICHARDSON wasn't really disliked by the british boxing public. he wasn't an angel in the ring (a bit of dirty fighter) but they didn't get on his back as far as I remember. brian London was disliked more around that time because he was regarded - rightly or wrongly - as a guy that didn't try to win and would too easily cave in.Cholo_cws wrote:Yes, Chisora. I didn't think of him.
I used the term dislike loosely. Maybe unpopular is better.
Anybody know or remember how Dick Richardson was viewed? I believe he had his fair share of controversies in the ring.
Re: 'Villains' - which British boxers were seen as the bad guy?
Eubanks v Benn first fight
-
el_grande_mauro_mina
- Lightweight
- Posts: 11215
- Joined: 24 Dec 2017, 11:54
Re: 'Villains' - which British boxers were seen as the bad guy?
A very nice guy, I remember wanting him to win that one.tear up wrote:Esham Pickering
-
wappingboy
- Super Middleweight
- Posts: 68
- Joined: 07 Oct 2012, 13:28
Re: 'Villains' - which British boxers were seen as the bad guy?
till kevin lear smashed him to bits in his own backyardtear up wrote:Michael Gomez is a legend in my eye s
Re: 'Villains' - which British boxers were seen as the bad guy?
Kevin Lear was a really good boxer, he did well that night; his brother Danny was a really good amateur.
Re: 'Villains' - which British boxers were seen as the bad guy?
A very nice guy, I remember wanting him to win that one.Fat Git wrote:tear up wrote:Esham Pickering
He was a class fighter esham I heard lately he s got his licence back and going to fight again
-
misterpunch
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 1252
- Joined: 13 Jan 2012, 17:48
Re: 'Villains' - which British boxers were seen as the bad guy?
yeah, kevin was great in that one. would have had a very interesting career but for the shoulder. I think he went over and gave gomez a kiss to wind him up when he got in the ring! (then smashed him to bits)wappingboy wrote:till kevin lear smashed him to bits in his own backyardtear up wrote:Michael Gomez is a legend in my eye s
gotta love gomez though - top bloke