Groves signing with Sauerland - Good move?

Groves signing with Sauerland - Good move?

Yes
66
64%
No
20
19%
Undecided
17
17%
 
Total votes: 103

TopGun
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 1532
Joined: 24 Jun 2012, 05:27

Groves signing with Sauerland - Good move?

Post by TopGun »

Think he will make some money with this signing as they will put him in with Kessler but I'm not sure if it will be good in the long run, time will tell.
TJ77
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1352
Joined: 19 Sep 2010, 13:01

Re: Groves signing with Sauerland - Good move?

Post by TJ77 »

I think its good that a British fighter of George's calibre has signed with someone other than Matchroom as their monopoly is not healthy for the sport now.IMO
I think Sky like Groves and if it means they look at showing some other people's shows that will be a winner all round.
They seem likeable and a fight with Sturm would be a bonus if they could make that.
black panther
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4098
Joined: 11 Dec 2003, 07:06

Re: Groves signing with Sauerland - Good move?

Post by black panther »

TJ77 wrote:I think its good that a British fighter of George's calibre has signed with someone other than Matchroom as their monopoly is not healthy for the sport now.
Agreed :TU:
DMA1987
Cruiserweight
Posts: 2927
Joined: 04 Jun 2011, 17:05

Re: Groves signing with Sauerland - Good move?

Post by DMA1987 »

TJ77 wrote:I think its good that a British fighter of George's calibre has signed with someone other than Matchroom as their monopoly is not healthy for the sport now.IMO
I think Sky like Groves and if it means they look at showing some other people's shows that will be a winner all round.
They seem likeable and a fight with Sturm would be a bonus if they could make that.
Is Sturm moving up? They do seem likeable, like you say it's good to break a monopoly. And its infinitely better than Warren.
whiskey
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11956
Joined: 27 Mar 2007, 14:52

Re: Groves signing with Sauerland - Good move?

Post by whiskey »

It makes no sense to sign two Brits back to back, who are both coming off two stoppage losses apiece.

They are educated guys, the Sauerlands - and I hope they haven't bought stock when it's at an all-time high, because it will plummet come 10.30pm on Saturday 31st May.

Lucian Bute was solid gold when he came to Nottingham, but he left as scrap iron on Froch's front garden alongside a rusty BBQ and an old washing machine for his Romanian brothers to collect.
Andrew
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 6108
Joined: 17 Jul 2012, 09:31

Re: Groves signing with Sauerland - Good move?

Post by Andrew »

TJ77 wrote:I think its good that a British fighter of George's calibre has signed with someone other than Matchroom as their monopoly is not healthy for the sport now.IMO
I think Sky like Groves and if it means they look at showing some other people's shows that will be a winner all round.
They seem likeable and a fight with Sturm would be a bonus if they could make that.
I'm sure Sturm is independant from Saeurland and has he own TV deal in Germany which is huge. Hence why Barker got 1mill euros.

Also doubt he would ever move up to Super Middle.
Cyclops
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5756
Joined: 13 Jun 2009, 04:14

Re: Groves signing with Sauerland - Good move?

Post by Cyclops »

Is Abraham with them?
The Law
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1949
Joined: 19 Feb 2005, 19:02

Re: Groves signing with Sauerland - Good move?

Post by The Law »

clopixolacuphase wrote:Is Abraham with them?
Yes
mullenman
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1124
Joined: 23 Oct 2012, 11:10

Re: Groves signing with Sauerland - Good move?

Post by mullenman »

bad news for me,,

i hope froch knocks the ginger kid out,,
keirw
Middleweight
Posts: 2681
Joined: 03 Nov 2013, 10:55

Re: Groves signing with Sauerland - Good move?

Post by keirw »

Undecided, it depends whether he wins or not against Froch. If he wins he can go straight into a couple of big money fights, but if he looses they will no doubt have him sparking out bums for a few months before they can put him in a big fight. Strange timing by the Sauerland boys, really.
SteveDow
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1800
Joined: 25 Aug 2009, 20:05

Re: Groves signing with Sauerland - Good move?

Post by SteveDow »

G0mez wrote:It makes no sense to sign two Brits back to back, who are both coming off two stoppage losses apiece.

They are educated guys, the Sauerlands - and I hope they haven't bought stock when it's at an all-time high, because it will plummet come 10.30pm on Saturday 31st May.

Lucian Bute was solid gold when he came to Nottingham, but he left as scrap iron on Froch's front garden alongside a rusty BBQ and an old washing machine for his Romanian brothers to collect.
Depends how you look at it of course as if Groves wins then he'd be a lot more expensive than he is now as it would catapult him into the position as second best in the division.
palooka
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 15698
Joined: 20 Jan 2012, 15:31

Re: Groves signing with Sauerland - Good move?

Post by palooka »

SteveDow wrote:
G0mez wrote:It makes no sense to sign two Brits back to back, who are both coming off two stoppage losses apiece.

They are educated guys, the Sauerlands - and I hope they haven't bought stock when it's at an all-time high, because it will plummet come 10.30pm on Saturday 31st May.

Lucian Bute was solid gold when he came to Nottingham, but he left as scrap iron on Froch's front garden alongside a rusty BBQ and an old washing machine for his Romanian brothers to collect.
Depends how you look at it of course as if Groves wins then he'd be a lot more expensive than he is now as it would catapult him into the position as second best in the division.
Though the 2nd best in the division will be more marketable than the best. If Groves win he'll earn big.
mickey1975
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 23192
Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54

Re: Groves signing with Sauerland - Good move?

Post by mickey1975 »

I wonder if this had anything to do with Price mysteriously having to part ways with Booth.
SteveDow
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1800
Joined: 25 Aug 2009, 20:05

Re: Groves signing with Sauerland - Good move?

Post by SteveDow »

palooka wrote:
SteveDow wrote:
G0mez wrote:It makes no sense to sign two Brits back to back, who are both coming off two stoppage losses apiece.

They are educated guys, the Sauerlands - and I hope they haven't bought stock when it's at an all-time high, because it will plummet come 10.30pm on Saturday 31st May.

Lucian Bute was solid gold when he came to Nottingham, but he left as scrap iron on Froch's front garden alongside a rusty BBQ and an old washing machine for his Romanian brothers to collect.
Depends how you look at it of course as if Groves wins then he'd be a lot more expensive than he is now as it would catapult him into the position as second best in the division.
Though the 2nd best in the division will be more marketable than the best. If Groves win he'll earn big.
I'd have thought a fight with Ward would follow within a year at most if Groves beats Froch. Defence against Degale then unification with Ward (although of course Groves may want to milk the belt first for 2 or 3 defences).
zero
Cruiserweight
Posts: 439
Joined: 16 Aug 2011, 16:30

Re: Groves signing with Sauerland - Good move?

Post by zero »

George is obviously butt hurt Hearn is rooting for the “international super star” that is Carl Froch. Not sure where George will be fighting with this move. IMO he should have taken his time and made the decision after the fight. Froch could have well retired and George vs DeGale is a huge fight. Eddie might look to guide James down another route now.
zero
Cruiserweight
Posts: 439
Joined: 16 Aug 2011, 16:30

Re: Groves signing with Sauerland - Good move?

Post by zero »

mickey1975 wrote:I wonder if this had anything to do with Price mysteriously having to part ways with Booth.
Nope, I don’t think Adam was wanting to trounce around Europe while Price goes life and death with tomato cans.. :lol:
stevedoc
Super Middleweight
Posts: 3550
Joined: 24 May 2013, 07:40

Re: Groves signing with Sauerland - Good move?

Post by stevedoc »

zero wrote:George is obviously butt hurt Hearn is rooting for the “international super star” that is Carl Froch. Not sure where George will be fighting with this move. IMO he should have taken his time and made the decision after the fight. Froch could have well retired and George vs DeGale is a huge fight. Eddie might look to guide James down another route now.
when i've seen groves and eddie hearn together they seemed to get on well and i was sure groves would of signed with hearn if he beat froch ....
freddydoesdallas
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9436
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 13:48

Re: Groves signing with Sauerland - Good move?

Post by freddydoesdallas »

G0mez wrote:It makes no sense to sign two Brits back to back, who are both coming off two stoppage losses apiece.

They are educated guys, the Sauerlands - and I hope they haven't bought stock when it's at an all-time high, because it will plummet come 10.30pm on Saturday 31st May.

Lucian Bute was solid gold when he came to Nottingham, but he left as scrap iron on Froch's front garden alongside a rusty BBQ and an old washing machine for his Romanian brothers to collect.
Yes GOmez, what a post!

:bag:
willardx
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 157
Joined: 05 Feb 2010, 05:39

Re: Groves signing with Sauerland - Good move?

Post by willardx »

maybe it hints at a lack of GG confidence, as its a bit of an insurance policy if it goes tits up against Froch. If he was confident of winning you'd think he'd remain independent?
billy nelson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1966
Joined: 12 Apr 2010, 12:49

Re: Groves signing with Sauerland - Good move?

Post by billy nelson »

zero wrote:George is obviously butt hurt Hearn is rooting for the “international super star” that is Carl Froch. Not sure where George will be fighting with this move. IMO he should have taken his time and made the decision after the fight. Froch could have well retired and George vs DeGale is a huge fight. Eddie might look to guide James down another route now.
But George v strum, Kessler, abraham would be bigger IMO than James de gale based on what those three guys have acheived
freddydoesdallas
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9436
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 13:48

Re: Groves signing with Sauerland - Good move?

Post by freddydoesdallas »

billy nelson wrote:
zero wrote:George is obviously butt hurt Hearn is rooting for the “international super star” that is Carl Froch. Not sure where George will be fighting with this move. IMO he should have taken his time and made the decision after the fight. Froch could have well retired and George vs DeGale is a huge fight. Eddie might look to guide James down another route now.
But George v strum, Kessler, abraham would be bigger IMO than James de gale based on what those three guys have acheived
Surely the DeGale fight would be a bigger money fight. Look how sky and matchroom have been able to sell this rematch because of a slightly early stoppage. They'd be able to convince the general public that their first fight was a wrong decision and getting them to part with their hard earned again. The pair of them would be happy to spend time in front of the cameras too.

All a side story though as Groves is getting sparked
DMA1987
Cruiserweight
Posts: 2927
Joined: 04 Jun 2011, 17:05

Re: Groves signing with Sauerland - Good move?

Post by DMA1987 »

billy nelson wrote:
zero wrote:George is obviously butt hurt Hearn is rooting for the “international super star” that is Carl Froch. Not sure where George will be fighting with this move. IMO he should have taken his time and made the decision after the fight. Froch could have well retired and George vs DeGale is a huge fight. Eddie might look to guide James down another route now.
But George v strum, Kessler, abraham would be bigger IMO than James de gale based on what those three guys have acheived
Bigger in what sense? In terms of publicity and size, it matters more about whether they capture the imagination than what those opponents have achieved. DeGale would be a bigger fight than all 3.
Last edited by DMA1987 on 20 May 2014, 10:59, edited 1 time in total.
zero
Cruiserweight
Posts: 439
Joined: 16 Aug 2011, 16:30

Re: Groves signing with Sauerland - Good move?

Post by zero »

The more I think about it this is a massive own goal by George he could have been the next PPV star in Britain. Will any of his fans go over to Germany to watch him fight!! As for fighting Sturm really??
palooka
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 15698
Joined: 20 Jan 2012, 15:31

Re: Groves signing with Sauerland - Good move?

Post by palooka »

zero wrote:The more I think about it this is a massive own goal by George he could have been the next PPV star in Britain. Will any of his fans go over to Germany to watch him fight!! As for fighting Sturm really??
I'd have thought his promoters would be able to organise a fight or 2 in Britain and it may be that US promoters and TV stations would prefer to work with the Sauerlands?
billy nelson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1966
Joined: 12 Apr 2010, 12:49

Re: Groves signing with Sauerland - Good move?

Post by billy nelson »

Fantastic move by GG the Sauerland boys work with everyone and that in itself is huge
The list of potential fights for him should he beat Carl Froch is endless and hopefully it makes him a wealthy young man
Post Reply