Can you make a solid case

Tuan_Jim
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Can you make a solid case

Post by Tuan_Jim »

drunkenpiper36 wrote:Funny how some label Vitali Klitschko as having no skill when in fact he's statistically lost the fewest number of rounds of any heavyweight champion on record, beat several ring ranked opponents and was pushing ( an albeit aged ) Lennox Lewis's stool in before the stoppage.. Guy has a good jab and decent outside fighting game. He doesn't take too many shots and up until about a few years ago, stopped about 90% of his opponents.
I can't help but groan when a man pulls out statistics to try and prove the worth of a fighter.

John Ruiz won more heavyweight title fights than David Tua. Statistically he is better than Tua. And yet Tua splattered him in 19 seconds.

Vitali has this 90% KO ratio, higher than Earnie Shavers, and yet he couldn't even knock down Obed Sullivan (splattered by Tua in 60 seconds next time out), or Corrie Sanders, or Shannon Briggs, or Sam Peter, the list goes on . . . a man with a 90% knockout ratio. Perhaps those stats need to be critically evaluated.

The 'he's lost the fewest rounds of a champ on record' is cringeworthy. What heavyweight champ on record ever lost a round to opponents the quality of Obed Sullivan, Ed Mahone, Danny Williams, Charr, Chisora, Sosnowski, Arreola, Peter and all the other slugs who appear on that slimey list? Who exactly on Vitali's list would give any great a run for their money, and win any rounds? Name the opponent & name the great who would be trailing them.

Once again blind statistics don't stand up to critical evaluation.
drunkenpiper36
Middleweight
Posts: 1420
Joined: 22 Nov 2013, 11:13

Re: Can you make a solid case

Post by drunkenpiper36 »

"Tuan_Jim"]

I can't help but groan when a man pulls out statistics to try and prove the worth of a fighter.
They don't tell the whole story. But they shouldn't be entirely overlooked either.
John Ruiz won more heavyweight title fights than David Tua. Statistically he is better than Tua. And yet Tua splattered him in 19 seconds.
Jose Luis Garcia stopped Ken Norton at a comparable phase in his career. Should Garcia be ranked higher than Norton?
Vitali has this 90% KO ratio, higher than Earnie Shavers, and yet he couldn't even knock down Obed Sullivan (splattered by Tua in 60 seconds next time out), or Corrie Sanders, or Shannon Briggs, or Sam Peter, the list goes on . . . a man with a 90% knockout ratio. Perhaps those stats need to be critically evaluated.
Not comparing Vitali Klitschko to the likes of Earnie Shavers, George Foreman, Sonny Liston, etc. Only pointing out that he could punch, or if you prefer, that he had the ability to stop guys inside the distance.
The 'he's lost the fewest rounds of a champ on record' is cringeworthy. What heavyweight champ on record ever lost a round to opponents the quality of Obed Sullivan, Ed Mahone, Danny Williams, Charr, Chisora, Sosnowski, Arreola, Peter and all the other slugs who appear on that slimey list?
I think you and I can both come up with some names if we wanted to. Muhammad Ali was believed by some to have been gifted against Doug Jones. Never saw the fight, but that's what I've been told. He was decked by Henry Cooper in the match right before lifting the title off of Liston. Holmes was decked by Renaldo Snipes who may or may not be better than some of the men you listed, but let's just say comparable. Louis was decked by a two year retired Braddock, floored by Tony Galento. Holyfield had a scary moment or two against Burt Cooper. To clarify I acknowledge that these were not the best opponents of these mentioned greats and nor do their legacies rest on the shoulders of them. But we should also consider that some of the men Vitali beat came after spending four years in retirement and in his late 30's to early 40's. Sam Peter was the WBC champion. He had certainly given Wladimir a good fight and hammered Maskaev for the title. Vitali at age 37 beat him in domimant fashion in his first fight after a four year layoff. Corrie Sanders had just sparked Wlad emphatically. Kirk Johnson looked to be in miserable shape but was a fighter in good standing and lost easily. Dereck Chisora has since gotten his act together and is ranked. That's just to list a few.

Who exactly on Vitali's list would give any great a run for their money, and win any rounds? Name the opponent & name the great who would be trailing them.
I can't say for sure because the only way that we'd ever find out is for them to actually meet in the ring. Who would have picked Buster Douglas to beat Mike Tyson or Billy Conn to give Louis such trouble?
Once again blind statistics don't stand up to critical evaluation.
True. But I don't think he looks inept on film or that his skills are all that bad. My main criticism of him is that he's extremely slow. But his jab, defense, and generalship isn't as poor as often made out to be. Sure I realize he's no Muhammad Ali. But you don't make it through nearly 50 fights, a dozen title bouts, and a series of ranked opponents and have some of the accomplishments that he has by being a bum. That's all I'm saying.
Ambling Alp II
Super Middleweight
Posts: 15178
Joined: 04 Nov 2012, 18:31

Re: Can you make a solid case

Post by Ambling Alp II »

I don't think anyone is saying he is a bum. Just that he wasn't nearly as good as Dempsey, Marciano, Louis, Bowe and Lewis. Not that these guys were perfect because no one is. They all had losses and/or off performances. (Btw, Jones was not robbed by Ali, and it was the Fight of the Year.) However, their overall careers were much, much more impressive.

Vitaly and his brother is much closer to guys like Willard, Carnera, Simon, Buddy Baer etc.
drunkenpiper36
Middleweight
Posts: 1420
Joined: 22 Nov 2013, 11:13

Re: Can you make a solid case

Post by drunkenpiper36 »

Ambling Alp II wrote:I don't think anyone is saying he is a bum. Just that he wasn't nearly as good as Dempsey, Marciano, Louis, Bowe and Lewis. Not that these guys were perfect because no one is. They all had losses and/or off performances. (Btw, Jones was not robbed by Ali, and it was the Fight of the Year.) However, their overall careers were much, much more impressive.

Vitaly and his brother is much closer to guys like Willard, Carnera, Simon, Buddy Baer etc.
Fair enough. I won't claim that he was better than the greats you listed, but frankly I think he'd have a real shot at beating Willard, Carnera, Simon, etc..
HomicideHenry
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 18722
Joined: 08 Sep 2005, 00:43

Re: Can you make a solid case

Post by HomicideHenry »

Vitali's style, though awkward, was really to his benefit. I like how the commentators for the Lewis/Klitschko fight said "And they both come out with John L. Sullivan and Gentleman Jim Corbett!", because Klitschko, more so than Lewis, was in that old-fashioned pose that you often see of fighters in the 19th century and prior. It is the same style, and pose, that many men (especially giants) took. If one looks at pictures of Fred Fulton, or even Harry Wills, you see see the stiff back, bent leg, arms out look to them. Vitali, essentially, was a throw back fighter--- and such pose only benefited his punching power, because in said pose you have more of a natural alignment and movement to maximize body weight. Next time, if you ever get the chance, look up the "three knuckle" method of punching--- and you will see Vitali does indeed punch that way.

Personally, I do think Vitali beats alot of guys. Just because he happened to lose on a freak TKO against Lewis, doesnt mean he couldnt be deadly dangerous to other men. There probably wasnt a heavyweight as slippery as Byrd, and Vitali was kicking his ass on the scorecards by a wide margin before his shoulder blew out on him. And man oh man, could Vitali take a punch too. Never once hit canvas (as a boxer anyways). IMHO, he beats Willard and Carnera--- and they would of been interesting contests, which would of turned into slugfests.
SaadOffTheDeck
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 19602
Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38

Re: Can you make a solid case

Post by SaadOffTheDeck »

LOL at freak TKO. You're a riot.
Counter-puncher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 39141
Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41

Re: Can you make a solid case

Post by Counter-puncher »

HomicideHenry wrote: If one looks at pictures of Fred Fulton, or even Harry Wills, you see see the stiff back, bent leg, arms out look to them. Vitali, essentially, was a throw back fighter--- and such pose only benefited his punching power, because in said pose you have more of a natural alignment and movement to maximize body weight.

.
strange, then, that Vitali fails to punch his weight, or even close to his weight

actually, it's not strange. the bolded bit is pure cod-biomechanics. Vitali's stance absolutely fvcking sucks at utilizing his bodyweight in punching. for a 240-odd man his leveraging of his weight is beyond pathetic.
Bard of Boxrec
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13113
Joined: 22 Feb 2002, 20:00

Re: Can you make a solid case

Post by Bard of Boxrec »

I just made this

Image
Counter-puncher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 39141
Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41

Re: Can you make a solid case

Post by Counter-puncher »

i'm still reeling at his biomechanical 'analysis'

you may as well just say Vitali's punching power is down to the Valmorification he extracts from his fvcking enzymes.
Ezzard
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11173
Joined: 12 May 2005, 09:20

Re: Can you make a solid case

Post by Ezzard »

I have defended the Klits...not in terms of aesthetic appeal...but in effectiveness... I think they are both excellent fighters who would give any HW a run for their money.

But Vitali is not a puncher. He has one of the great chins of boxing. He has size advantages which he uses to the maximum and he throws a lot of punches. When he does put his weight behind his right hand it's a good shot. But if Foreman's best is a 10/10 then Vitali's best is probably about a 6.
SaadOffTheDeck
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 19602
Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38

Re: Can you make a solid case

Post by SaadOffTheDeck »

Counter-puncher wrote:
HomicideHenry wrote: If one looks at pictures of Fred Fulton, or even Harry Wills, you see see the stiff back, bent leg, arms out look to them. Vitali, essentially, was a throw back fighter--- and such pose only benefited his punching power, because in said pose you have more of a natural alignment and movement to maximize body weight.

.
strange, then, that Vitali fails to punch his weight, or even close to his weight

actually, it's not strange. the bolded bit is pure cod-biomechanics. Vitali's stance absolutely fvcking sucks at utilizing his bodyweight in punching. for a 240-odd man his leveraging of his weight is beyond pathetic.
:lol:

I missed that skimming. Arm punching maximizes punching power? Yup, he's comedic gold.
palooka
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 15698
Joined: 20 Jan 2012, 15:31

Re: Can you make a solid case

Post by palooka »

Riddick Blowe wrote:I just made this

Image
A solid case? :OhYes:
Bobbyptsd
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1858
Joined: 24 Apr 2011, 00:58

Re: Can you make a solid case

Post by Bobbyptsd »

Counter-puncher wrote:i'm still reeling at his biomechanical 'analysis'

you may as well just say Vitali's punching power is down to the Valmorification he extracts from his fvcking enzymes.
:lol:

I read that last bit in a serious car commercial narrator voice.
HomicideHenry
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 18722
Joined: 08 Sep 2005, 00:43

Re: Can you make a solid case

Post by HomicideHenry »

Ezzard wrote:I have defended the Klits...not in terms of aesthetic appeal...but in effectiveness... I think they are both excellent fighters who would give any HW a run for their money.

But Vitali is not a puncher. He has one of the great chins of boxing. He has size advantages which he uses to the maximum and he throws a lot of punches. When he does put his weight behind his right hand it's a good shot. But if Foreman's best is a 10/10 then Vitali's best is probably about a 6.
I strongly disagree. Have you not taken a gander at his record, and what his kayo percentage is? Vitali Klitschko in 47 fights (45 wins, 2 losses, 41 kayos) averages 87.23% overall. Compare this number with other hall of fame greats, and you will see he belongs among the very top. Let's take a gander, shall we, maybe we all will learn something then.

Comparison's In Kayo Percentages (Post-Career)

George Foreman- 83.95% (prior to his loss with Ali, Foreman had a 92.5%)
Joe Louis- 83.6%
Sonny Liston- 82%
Jim Jeffries- 71%
Lennox Lewis- 44%
Joe Frazier- 74%
Max Baer- 63%

So, at the end of the day, we have to state that Vitali is a top five all time heavyweight puncher.
Counter-puncher wrote: strange, then, that Vitali fails to punch his weight, or even close to his weight

actually, it's not strange. the bolded bit is pure cod-biomechanics. Vitali's stance absolutely fvcking sucks at utilizing his bodyweight in punching. for a 240-odd man his leveraging of his weight is beyond pathetic.
You point out "cod-biomechanics". Yet, as I shown Vitali's knockout percentage is nearly 88% overall. What does this mean to those who see that number? After all, for a long time Vitali was considered the better brother, and fought the better opposition, and was the more entertaining of the two in terms of style--- as Vitali was more aggressive, and the kayos came at a faster rate, earlier on, than in Vladimir's fights. If he is/was fighting in a 'pathetic' stance, never utilizing his weight advantages, as you insist, then could you imagine if he actually did? He would easily be the hardest hitting heavyweight that ever lived because (in your eyes) he was half-assing it.
Counter-puncher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 39141
Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41

Re: Can you make a solid case

Post by Counter-puncher »

HomicideHenry wrote:
You point out "cod-biomechanics". Yet, as I shown Vitali's knockout percentage is nearly 88% overall. What does this mean to those who see that number? After all, for a long time Vitali was considered the better brother, and fought the better opposition, and was the more entertaining of the two in terms of style--- as Vitali was more aggressive, and the kayos came at a faster rate, earlier on, than in Vladimir's fights. If he is/was fighting in a 'pathetic' stance, never utilizing his weight advantages, as you insist, then could you imagine if he actually did? He would easily be the hardest hitting heavyweight that ever lived because (in your eyes) he was half-assing it.

apparently, it means an awful lot more than it should. just, please, stick to talking about him on the level of his record. make of it what you will. just for god's sake don't talk about his punching mechanics like you know what you're watching.
SaadOffTheDeck
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 19602
Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38

Re: Can you make a solid case

Post by SaadOffTheDeck »

:lol:

Now the KO% comes out, the last resort of the truly desperate. I guess hector Camacho punched harder than Ike Williams.
HomicideHenry
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 18722
Joined: 08 Sep 2005, 00:43

Re: Can you make a solid case

Post by HomicideHenry »

Counter-puncher wrote:apparently, it means an awful lot more than it should. just, please, stick to talking about him on the level of his record. make of it what you will. just for god's sake don't talk about his punching mechanics like you know what you're watching.
Sometime in the near future I will have to create a thread, going in full detail w/ pictures and film, promoting the merits of earlier styles/stances which generated punching power to a greater degree than stances/styles today. As I mentioned before, the three-knuckle system of boxing was superior to the current two-knuckle system because A) more surface area, and B) it followed the 'power line' of the human anatomy more naturally than the two-knuckle frame line.
SaadOffTheDeck wrote::lol:

Now the KO% comes out, the last resort of the truly desperate. I guess hector Camacho punched harder than Ike Williams.
So, without further delay, I will judge Vitali on the "level of his record".

Amateur Boxing- 195-15 (80)
Kick Boxing- 4x Amateur Champion, 2x Professional, 34-1 (22)*
Professional Boxing- 45-2-0 (41) , 2x WBC champion

*Was only stopped once as a kick-boxer by the legendary Pele Reid and this was in the amateurs. He never lost by kayo in the professional kick boxing ranks. It must be noted that in an issue of UFC magazine, Vitli Klitschko was voted the most likely boxer to have success in mma.

He fought and defeated, in essence, five champions in his career. While not near the depth of quality opposition as his younger brother's resume, one may argue that he (Vitali) fought the physically tougher competition. Men who were not so easy to put away in the ring. The five champions were:

-Shannon Briggs
-Tomasz Adamek
-Herbie Hide
-Juan Carlos Gomez
-Samuel Peter

And, he also fought some rather tough contenders, like Chris Arreola, Timo Hoffman, Vaughn Bean, and Larry Donald. While not the sort of list to inspire a would be sportswriter's imagination, it is a solid and respectable list of men who had attributes alot of people don't necessarily hold to high regard, but should when concerning the "big picture".

Of Vitali's two losses as a pro, both were on freak technical knockouts. The first, being against Chris Byrd when Vitali (well ahead on all cards) severely injured his shoulder. The second, being one of the most famous fights in recent years, was against Lennox Lewis where Klitschko was ahead on all score cards and suffered a nasty cut of grotesque proportions. These fights are either over-done or under-sold, depending on which side of the argument you are on; but the fact being that Vitali was ahead in both fights, and the fact that Lewis retired rather than face Klitschko in a $40 million dollar super-fight which would of shattered the previous record of Tyson-Lewis speaks volumes, at least in my mind's eye as to whether Lewis felt he could of won in a return bout.

However, let's look at the qualifications of the men listed in this thus far, and see their general worth. For the most part, the majority of these men were either never stopped prior to meeting Klitschko, or had lost by kayo or technical kayo once in their relative primes or early on in their careers; kayo losses that would follow were near the end of their careers. In layman's terms, these were guys you were going to have to pack a lunch with, in order to fight, because it was going to be a long night. These were men with great abilities to absorb punishment, or were highly skilled men who seldom ever got caught with punches.

Shannon Briggs, for example, was only stopped twice in his career. Once was to a prime/peak Lennox Lewis, and the other happened early in his career. When he fought Vitali, it was considered the most one-sided and brutal encounters in recent years and should of been stopped several rounds before. The referee for the contest, if memory serves me right, was punished for allowing the contest to go a full twelve rounds.

Chris Arreola, has only been stopped twice in his career. One to Vitali, the other to Stiverne. Herbie Hide, of his four kayo losses, two were well passed his prime; the other two were against Riddick Bowe and Vitali Klitschko. Juan Carlos Gomez, was only stopped twice in his career, one was to Vitali and the other before he was the unified Cruiserweight champion. Samuel Peter, only lost by kayo twice, one was to Vitali and the other against Robert Helenius. Tomasz Adamek, who had beaten the likes of giants like Golota, McBride, Grant, and been a LHW and CW champion, only lost by kayo once and that was against Vitali. Corrie Sanders, who sparked out Vitali's brother in two rounds, may very well of been the most under-rated heavyweight of the passed thirty years and was only stopped twice prior to Vitali. One was early on in his career, the other to Hasim Rahman.

Outside of Briggs, who was the only men to go the full route with Vitali? Hoffman and Johnson. Sure, they weren't overly good heavyweights, but Vitali is in good company. Nobody has ever kayoed Kevin Johnson, which is remarkable considering Johnson is one of the smaller career heavyweights in the division and has the lowest-punch rate in the division. Hoffman, was only stopped in 2007 and 2013; which isn't altogether surprising considering he turned pro in 1993. Old age, was the only reason he finally got caught after all these years.

How about others that he fought? Kirk Johnson was only stopped once in his career. Yep, it was from Klitschko. Larry Donald? Klitschko was the only one to do the feat; not Holyfield, Povetkin, Valuev, Witherspoon, or Riddick Bowe. Vaughn Bean? Again, only Klitschko managed it; not Moorer, Holyfield, Diaz, Thompson, or Dimintrenko. How about the ol' Ironhead himself Ross Puritty? He only lost by kayo twice, the first in his second pro fight, the other by Vitali; not Morrison, Rahman, Grant, Sanders.

I think when one really looks at the overall career of Vitali Klitschko, one can sufficiently say that Vitali had tremendous punching power. When you compare his record to others of power and might, one can make a good argument that Vitali accomplished more, and against better competition. How so? Let's take a gander at Earnie Shavers career record. Now, I know "The Acorn" is held in high regard on this forum, after all he almost kayoed a Parkinson's victim named Muhammad Ali and floored Larry Holmes, in what may of been the only crowning glory moment he had between two, one-sided contests with the Easton Assassin, but before people go crazy really look at the record.

Shavers, for being the alleged "Puncher of The Century" couldn't do a thing with Ron Stander. Stander is best known for being a complete unknown, who got a title shot against Joe Frazier and was stopped in four rounds. In fact, Shavers lost by kayo against Stander, who was at best a journeyman boxer whose full-time job was being owning and operating a butchershop. Shavers also couldn't do a thing with the likes of Boone Kirkman, who had lost on kayo to the likes of George Foreman and others hard punchers in the era.

Sure, supporters will point out that these losses came early on, but when you look at Shavers record the majority of his wins were against opponents with subpar records. This lack of topflight competition certainly showed whenever he took a step up, as he was blasted away in one round to Jerry Quarry, stopped in six against Ron Lyle, and would of course in subsequent years lose on kayo to the likes of Bernardo Mercado and Tex Cobb in seven and eight rounds respectively.

His best kayo wins, were against the shell that was once named Ken Norton in 1979 (KO1) and against Jimmy Ellis (KO1), and against the ancient Joe Bugner (KO2) in 1982. Some critics will also point out that Jimmy Young was also a victim, but considering Young was 7-3-0 as a professional at the time, and Shavers was a phenomenal 42-2-0, its safe to say at the time Young was just one of many who were following the script of being fed to the newest monster in the division.

Hey, I love Earnie too, he came from my home state and I interviewed the man twice, but who did he really beat that was in their prime, or was reknowned for their toughness? Nobody. There isn't a single name on the resume that warrants such speculations. The fact is, those who were tough enough to take the power of the Black Destroyer, were able to knock him out COLD. Not technical kayos, but actual knockouts. The same cannot be said of Vitali Klitschko, who was a proven knockout artist who kayoed men who seldom ever got hurt in the ring.

Of Earnie's overall 76.4% career kayo ratio the majority was against complete tomato cans and journeymen. There is no way around this fact. 23 first round knockouts; 50 kayos within three rounds or less. It all sounds incredible; but even LaMar Clark had 45 consecutive kayos against virtually the same caliber of opposition. Don't get me wrong, the man could hit, but was he really as great a puncher as many believe him to be? I don't think so. He's still top ten worthy, yes, but he never fought men who were known tough guys and beat them decisively like Vitali done.

Interesting side note, I must add, since I did interview Earnie twice, is that he stated on both occasions that he believed whole heartedly he could have kayoed both Klitschko's inside of two rounds. I made it a point to the listeners that Shavers had been kayoed by relatively less than high caliber opposition during his career, and never had Shavers ever fought men anywhere near the size and weight of the Klitschko's either. Considering Vitali never been stopped, let alone floored in his career, I highly doubt Shavers could of done so.
Bard of Boxrec
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13113
Joined: 22 Feb 2002, 20:00

Re: Can you make a solid case

Post by Bard of Boxrec »

Lol.
SaadOffTheDeck
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 19602
Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38

Re: Can you make a solid case

Post by SaadOffTheDeck »

I certainly didn't read that novel. :lol:

Vitali is an arm puncher, not nearly as powerful as his brother. Eyes can tell you that. He's above average, but certainly not devastating. The accumulation of blows and his abysmal opposition are the reason for the high percentage.
Bobbyptsd
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1858
Joined: 24 Apr 2011, 00:58

Re: Can you make a solid case

Post by Bobbyptsd »

I don't think anyone's saying he was a bad fighter, clearly, but when this is what you have to highlight:

-Shannon Briggs
-Tomasz Adamek
-Herbie Hide
-Juan Carlos Gomez
-Samuel Peter

There's a problem.
HomicideHenry
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 18722
Joined: 08 Sep 2005, 00:43

Re: Can you make a solid case

Post by HomicideHenry »

The premise was that those men were seldom ever (if ever) knocked out, until they met Vitali.

Is not a fighter a real, true, proven puncher when you're capable of knocking out men who have never been stopped before or only were stopped once or twice in their career?

That ain't no "arm-punching".... but if it is.... then if Klitschko did put weight into his shots, and threw proper punches... I think he would have easily killed someone, since alot of you are saying he was half-assing it throughout his whole career.
Bard of Boxrec
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13113
Joined: 22 Feb 2002, 20:00

Re: Can you make a solid case

Post by Bard of Boxrec »

You sure love the Klitschkos.
drunkenpiper36
Middleweight
Posts: 1420
Joined: 22 Nov 2013, 11:13

Re: Can you make a solid case

Post by drunkenpiper36 »

"SaadOffTheDeck"]I certainly didn't read that novel. :lol:
You should have. It was a good read.
SaadOffTheDeck
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 19602
Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38

Re: Can you make a solid case

Post by SaadOffTheDeck »

HomicideHenry wrote:The premise was that those men were seldom ever (if ever) knocked out, until they met Vitali.

Is not a fighter a real, true, proven puncher when you're capable of knocking out men who have never been stopped before or only were stopped once or twice in their career?

That ain't no "arm-punching".... but if it is.... then if Klitschko did put weight into his shots, and threw proper punches... I think he would have easily killed someone, since alot of you are saying he was half-assing it throughout his whole career.
:lol:
SaadOffTheDeck
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 19602
Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38

Re: Can you make a solid case

Post by SaadOffTheDeck »

drunkenpiper36 wrote:
"SaadOffTheDeck"]I certainly didn't read that novel. :lol:
You should have. It was a good read.
Glad you enjoyed it. :TU:

Knowing the author, I knew it wasn't for me. KO% is the flimsiest excuse for Vitali.
Post Reply