Burns v Zlaticanin - Undercard and RBR

Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22335
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Burns v Zlaticanin - Undercard and RBR

Post by Horse »

116-110 Limond
reggaereggae
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4723
Joined: 21 Dec 2009, 17:01

Re: Burns v Zlaticanin - Undercard and RBR

Post by reggaereggae »

Hopefully Woodhouse will retire for good now so we don't have to put up with his ignorant, deluded Tweets anymore.
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: Burns v Zlaticanin - Undercard and RBR

Post by crusader »

Holy fuckk at the 113-113 card
Final round
Cruiserweight
Posts: 4911
Joined: 20 Oct 2010, 17:02

Re: Burns v Zlaticanin - Undercard and RBR

Post by Final round »

joke of a card by victor loughlin
ttornado
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Burns v Zlaticanin - Undercard and RBR

Post by ttornado »

reggaereggae wrote:Hopefully Woodhouse will retire for good now so we don't have to put up with his ignorant, deluded Tweets anymore.
so your twitter account gets deleted if you retire.
You're funny!
ThereByTheGrace
Cruiserweight
Posts: 4016
Joined: 04 Sep 2010, 05:22

Re: Burns v Zlaticanin - Undercard and RBR

Post by ThereByTheGrace »

Good fight and fair play to both boxers.
Black Sam Bellamy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1476
Joined: 25 Sep 2008, 13:51

Re: Burns v Zlaticanin - Undercard and RBR

Post by Black Sam Bellamy »

Jim Watt calls it a Limond masterclass and Victor Laughran calls it a draw. Jesus, you wonder what planet some people are on.
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: Burns v Zlaticanin - Undercard and RBR

Post by crusader »

Black Sam Bellamy wrote:Jim Watt calls it a Limond masterclass and Victor Laughran calls it a draw. Jesus, you wonder what planet some people are on.
Much closer to a masterclass than a draw in my opinion.
Sklar
Middleweight
Posts: 5680
Joined: 21 Sep 2013, 09:06

Re: Burns v Zlaticanin - Undercard and RBR

Post by Sklar »

Loughlin clearly can't read a fight.
gerryd77
Super Middleweight
Posts: 338
Joined: 30 Nov 2012, 17:30

Re: Burns v Zlaticanin - Undercard and RBR

Post by gerryd77 »

Sklar wrote:Loughlin clearly can't read a fight.
Great ref, poor judge?
ThereByTheGrace
Cruiserweight
Posts: 4016
Joined: 04 Sep 2010, 05:22

Re: Burns v Zlaticanin - Undercard and RBR

Post by ThereByTheGrace »

Alex Arthur is a tube! Why do they always ask him as the Scottish Sky Pundit! Scott Harrison would be much more interesting!
reggaereggae
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4723
Joined: 21 Dec 2009, 17:01

Re: Burns v Zlaticanin - Undercard and RBR

Post by reggaereggae »

ttornado wrote:
reggaereggae wrote:Hopefully Woodhouse will retire for good now so we don't have to put up with his ignorant, deluded Tweets anymore.
so your twitter account gets deleted if you retire.
You're funny!
Well no, he will undoubtedly spout crap; but no longer 'call out' other fighters or boast about how he's going to beat
Final round
Cruiserweight
Posts: 4911
Joined: 20 Oct 2010, 17:02

Re: Burns v Zlaticanin - Undercard and RBR

Post by Final round »

I think they underestimated Limmond..who was very good
reggaereggae
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4723
Joined: 21 Dec 2009, 17:01

Re: Burns v Zlaticanin - Undercard and RBR

Post by reggaereggae »

ThereByTheGrace wrote:Alex Arthur is a tube! Why do they always ask him as the Scottish Sky Pundit! Scott Harrison would be much more interesting!
Scott Harrison would turn up pissed, glare with hatred at the other pundits then chin Adam Smith. DEFINITELY would be more entertaining
ttornado
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Burns v Zlaticanin - Undercard and RBR

Post by ttornado »

reggaereggae wrote: about how he's going to beat
A boxer thinking he can win, terrible stuff.
ShadrachSimmo
Cruiserweight
Posts: 4738
Joined: 20 Oct 2010, 05:42

Re: Burns v Zlaticanin - Undercard and RBR

Post by ShadrachSimmo »

ThereByTheGrace wrote:Alex Arthur is a tube! Why do they always ask him as the Scottish Sky Pundit! Scott Harrison would be much more interesting!
I disagree. He's far more articulate and insightful than Harrison could ever be.

Unless he was pished :doh:
Sklar
Middleweight
Posts: 5680
Joined: 21 Sep 2013, 09:06

Re: Burns v Zlaticanin - Undercard and RBR

Post by Sklar »

gerryd77 wrote:
Sklar wrote:Loughlin clearly can't read a fight.
Great ref, poor judge?
That's what I think. He's a quality ref but if you a turn a card like that in you're not judging right IMO.
ThereByTheGrace
Cruiserweight
Posts: 4016
Joined: 04 Sep 2010, 05:22

Re: Burns v Zlaticanin - Undercard and RBR

Post by ThereByTheGrace »

reggaereggae wrote:
ThereByTheGrace wrote:Alex Arthur is a tube! Why do they always ask him as the Scottish Sky Pundit! Scott Harrison would be much more interesting!
Scott Harrison would turn up pissed, glare with hatred at the other pundits then chin Adam Smith. DEFINITELY would be more entertaining
Exactly!!

"There were crisps everywhere......."
Last edited by ThereByTheGrace on 27 Jun 2014, 17:19, edited 1 time in total.
stevieb_8006
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Burns v Zlaticanin - Undercard and RBR

Post by stevieb_8006 »

reggaereggae wrote:
ttornado wrote:
reggaereggae wrote:Hopefully Woodhouse will retire for good now so we don't have to put up with his ignorant, deluded Tweets anymore.
so your twitter account gets deleted if you retire.
You're funny!
Well no, he will undoubtedly spout crap; but no longer 'call out' other fighters or boast about how he's going to beat
im not on twitter so don't really know how it works, but cant u just not follow him?

I don't see the point in following someone when u don't like what he writes.

surely that's like watching a tv show u don't enjoy
ThereByTheGrace
Cruiserweight
Posts: 4016
Joined: 04 Sep 2010, 05:22

Re: Burns v Zlaticanin - Undercard and RBR

Post by ThereByTheGrace »

He looks like a determined and focused little elf.
Tarkus
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2859
Joined: 04 Jul 2010, 08:50

Re: Burns v Zlaticanin - Undercard and RBR

Post by Tarkus »

stevieb_8006 wrote:im not on twitter so don't really know how it works, but cant u just not follow him?

I don't see the point in following someone when u don't like what he writes.

surely that's like watching a tv show u don't enjoy
Not following someone doesn't prevent their rubbish been retwitted to your timeline by someone you follow.
stevieb_8006
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Burns v Zlaticanin - Undercard and RBR

Post by stevieb_8006 »

Tarkus wrote:
stevieb_8006 wrote:im not on twitter so don't really know how it works, but cant u just not follow him?

I don't see the point in following someone when u don't like what he writes.

surely that's like watching a tv show u don't enjoy
Not following someone doesn't prevent their rubbish been retwitted to your timeline by someone you follow.
I see. sounds awful. so your forced to read peoples opinions even if you don't like them. horrific.
Final round
Cruiserweight
Posts: 4911
Joined: 20 Oct 2010, 17:02

Re: Burns v Zlaticanin - Undercard and RBR

Post by Final round »

flattened
ThereByTheGrace
Cruiserweight
Posts: 4016
Joined: 04 Sep 2010, 05:22

Re: Burns v Zlaticanin - Undercard and RBR

Post by ThereByTheGrace »

Burns down in round 1 with a left hook from Dejan - first 30 seconds. Cue boring points victory for Burns,
Tarkus
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2859
Joined: 04 Jul 2010, 08:50

Re: Burns v Zlaticanin - Undercard and RBR

Post by Tarkus »

stevieb_8006 wrote:
Tarkus wrote:
stevieb_8006 wrote:im not on twitter so don't really know how it works, but cant u just not follow him?

I don't see the point in following someone when u don't like what he writes.

surely that's like watching a tv show u don't enjoy
Not following someone doesn't prevent their rubbish been retwitted to your timeline by someone you follow.
I see. sounds awful. so your forced to read peoples opinions even if you don't like them. horrific.
Only at times, but it can be frustrating.
Post Reply