Burns v Zlaticanin - Undercard and RBR
Re: Burns v Zlaticanin - Undercard and RBR
116-110 Limond
-
reggaereggae
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 4723
- Joined: 21 Dec 2009, 17:01
Re: Burns v Zlaticanin - Undercard and RBR
Hopefully Woodhouse will retire for good now so we don't have to put up with his ignorant, deluded Tweets anymore.
Re: Burns v Zlaticanin - Undercard and RBR
Holy fuckk at the 113-113 card
-
Final round
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 4911
- Joined: 20 Oct 2010, 17:02
Re: Burns v Zlaticanin - Undercard and RBR
joke of a card by victor loughlin
-
ttornado
- Heavyweight

Re: Burns v Zlaticanin - Undercard and RBR
so your twitter account gets deleted if you retire.reggaereggae wrote:Hopefully Woodhouse will retire for good now so we don't have to put up with his ignorant, deluded Tweets anymore.
You're funny!
-
ThereByTheGrace
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 4016
- Joined: 04 Sep 2010, 05:22
Re: Burns v Zlaticanin - Undercard and RBR
Good fight and fair play to both boxers.
-
Black Sam Bellamy
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1476
- Joined: 25 Sep 2008, 13:51
Re: Burns v Zlaticanin - Undercard and RBR
Jim Watt calls it a Limond masterclass and Victor Laughran calls it a draw. Jesus, you wonder what planet some people are on.
Re: Burns v Zlaticanin - Undercard and RBR
Much closer to a masterclass than a draw in my opinion.Black Sam Bellamy wrote:Jim Watt calls it a Limond masterclass and Victor Laughran calls it a draw. Jesus, you wonder what planet some people are on.
Re: Burns v Zlaticanin - Undercard and RBR
Loughlin clearly can't read a fight.
Re: Burns v Zlaticanin - Undercard and RBR
Great ref, poor judge?Sklar wrote:Loughlin clearly can't read a fight.
-
ThereByTheGrace
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 4016
- Joined: 04 Sep 2010, 05:22
Re: Burns v Zlaticanin - Undercard and RBR
Alex Arthur is a tube! Why do they always ask him as the Scottish Sky Pundit! Scott Harrison would be much more interesting!
-
reggaereggae
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 4723
- Joined: 21 Dec 2009, 17:01
Re: Burns v Zlaticanin - Undercard and RBR
Well no, he will undoubtedly spout crap; but no longer 'call out' other fighters or boast about how he's going to beatttornado wrote:so your twitter account gets deleted if you retire.reggaereggae wrote:Hopefully Woodhouse will retire for good now so we don't have to put up with his ignorant, deluded Tweets anymore.
You're funny!
-
Final round
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 4911
- Joined: 20 Oct 2010, 17:02
Re: Burns v Zlaticanin - Undercard and RBR
I think they underestimated Limmond..who was very good
-
reggaereggae
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 4723
- Joined: 21 Dec 2009, 17:01
Re: Burns v Zlaticanin - Undercard and RBR
Scott Harrison would turn up pissed, glare with hatred at the other pundits then chin Adam Smith. DEFINITELY would be more entertainingThereByTheGrace wrote:Alex Arthur is a tube! Why do they always ask him as the Scottish Sky Pundit! Scott Harrison would be much more interesting!
-
ttornado
- Heavyweight

Re: Burns v Zlaticanin - Undercard and RBR
A boxer thinking he can win, terrible stuff.reggaereggae wrote: about how he's going to beat
-
ShadrachSimmo
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 4738
- Joined: 20 Oct 2010, 05:42
Re: Burns v Zlaticanin - Undercard and RBR
I disagree. He's far more articulate and insightful than Harrison could ever be.ThereByTheGrace wrote:Alex Arthur is a tube! Why do they always ask him as the Scottish Sky Pundit! Scott Harrison would be much more interesting!
Unless he was pished
Re: Burns v Zlaticanin - Undercard and RBR
That's what I think. He's a quality ref but if you a turn a card like that in you're not judging right IMO.gerryd77 wrote:Great ref, poor judge?Sklar wrote:Loughlin clearly can't read a fight.
-
ThereByTheGrace
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 4016
- Joined: 04 Sep 2010, 05:22
Re: Burns v Zlaticanin - Undercard and RBR
Exactly!!reggaereggae wrote:Scott Harrison would turn up pissed, glare with hatred at the other pundits then chin Adam Smith. DEFINITELY would be more entertainingThereByTheGrace wrote:Alex Arthur is a tube! Why do they always ask him as the Scottish Sky Pundit! Scott Harrison would be much more interesting!
"There were crisps everywhere......."
Last edited by ThereByTheGrace on 27 Jun 2014, 17:19, edited 1 time in total.
-
stevieb_8006
- Heavyweight

Re: Burns v Zlaticanin - Undercard and RBR
im not on twitter so don't really know how it works, but cant u just not follow him?reggaereggae wrote:Well no, he will undoubtedly spout crap; but no longer 'call out' other fighters or boast about how he's going to beatttornado wrote:so your twitter account gets deleted if you retire.reggaereggae wrote:Hopefully Woodhouse will retire for good now so we don't have to put up with his ignorant, deluded Tweets anymore.
You're funny!
I don't see the point in following someone when u don't like what he writes.
surely that's like watching a tv show u don't enjoy
-
ThereByTheGrace
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 4016
- Joined: 04 Sep 2010, 05:22
Re: Burns v Zlaticanin - Undercard and RBR
He looks like a determined and focused little elf.
Re: Burns v Zlaticanin - Undercard and RBR
Not following someone doesn't prevent their rubbish been retwitted to your timeline by someone you follow.stevieb_8006 wrote:im not on twitter so don't really know how it works, but cant u just not follow him?
I don't see the point in following someone when u don't like what he writes.
surely that's like watching a tv show u don't enjoy
-
stevieb_8006
- Heavyweight

Re: Burns v Zlaticanin - Undercard and RBR
I see. sounds awful. so your forced to read peoples opinions even if you don't like them. horrific.Tarkus wrote:Not following someone doesn't prevent their rubbish been retwitted to your timeline by someone you follow.stevieb_8006 wrote:im not on twitter so don't really know how it works, but cant u just not follow him?
I don't see the point in following someone when u don't like what he writes.
surely that's like watching a tv show u don't enjoy
-
Final round
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 4911
- Joined: 20 Oct 2010, 17:02
-
ThereByTheGrace
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 4016
- Joined: 04 Sep 2010, 05:22
Re: Burns v Zlaticanin - Undercard and RBR
Burns down in round 1 with a left hook from Dejan - first 30 seconds. Cue boring points victory for Burns,
Re: Burns v Zlaticanin - Undercard and RBR
Only at times, but it can be frustrating.stevieb_8006 wrote:I see. sounds awful. so your forced to read peoples opinions even if you don't like them. horrific.Tarkus wrote:Not following someone doesn't prevent their rubbish been retwitted to your timeline by someone you follow.stevieb_8006 wrote:im not on twitter so don't really know how it works, but cant u just not follow him?
I don't see the point in following someone when u don't like what he writes.
surely that's like watching a tv show u don't enjoy