You said 'you are a boxer'. If it's a hobby then you are not a boxerKaaspeer wrote:Danconnollyeire, why would I have that? I'm not a proffesional, I just do it as a hobby.
I fear for Froch's safety
-
danconnollyeire
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 3576
- Joined: 24 May 2012, 10:31
Re: I fear for Froch's safety
Re: I fear for Froch's safety
You don't play boxingdanconnollyeire wrote:You said 'you are a boxer'. If it's a hobby then you are not a boxerKaaspeer wrote:Danconnollyeire, why would I have that? I'm not a proffesional, I just do it as a hobby.
-
Kaaspeer
- Heavyweight

Re: I fear for Froch's safety
Well, excuse me, f4ggot, I should have said "I train boxing as a hobby".
Re: I fear for Froch's safety
Kaaspeer wrote:f4ggot".
-
Kaaspeer
- Heavyweight

Re: I fear for Froch's safety
It's the internet, dude, you don't have to be sad about it.danamba7 wrote:Kaaspeer wrote:f4ggot".:(
Re: I fear for Froch's safety
[quote="Kaaspeer"]Well, excuse me, f4ggot,
The gayest thing ever typed
The gayest thing ever typed
Re: I fear for Froch's safety
Trust me, I'm not.Kaaspeer wrote:It's the internet, dude, you don't have to be sad about it.danamba7 wrote:Kaaspeer wrote:f4ggot".:(
-
jamesmcdonnell
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 45239
- Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11
Re: I fear for Froch's safety
Blood vessels deteriorate with age, increasing the risk of brain injury.ReggieDiggs wrote:Show me any stats that older fighters have a larger risk than peak or young fighters.Kaaspeer wrote:Froch is a strong warrior, but even the hardest of walls will crack with age in the face of continous attacks...
If you walk into a ring to fight the moment the bell rings your odds to take serious or deadly damage just went up drastically regardless of age or how many fight youve had.
-
jamesmcdonnell
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 45239
- Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11
Re: I fear for Froch's safety
Yeah, I'd hardly compare him to LaMotta - he's taken some lumps, but it's not like he's been on the receiving end of countless beatings, more often than not, he's been handing them out.handsofstone wrote:Apart from both the Kessler fights and the first Groves fight,Froch hasnt been in that many wars anyhow,Ward and Taylor were successful but they werent going to town on Carl,most of the demolition jobs in his career were waged by him
Re: I fear for Froch's safety
If I were to pick anyone that is currently boxing to have some longer term effects of having their brains get bounced around too much, it would be Provo and Rios. They stop most of the punches thrown at them with their face.
Interestingly enough, I think they might be fighting each other next.
Rios made almost a million in his last fight, so he won't be quitting anytime soon, no matter how many people feel sorry for him and worry about his safety. Believe it or not, there are a lot more dangerous jobs out there than boxing, that pay a lot less.
Interestingly enough, I think they might be fighting each other next.
-
SMALL AXE1
- Middleweight
- Posts: 233
- Joined: 12 Mar 2014, 09:40
Re: I fear for Froch's safety
He is the wrong person to ask, he literally wants to bum Froch, or may he already has.palooka wrote:There's a fellow on the British and Irish forum called GOmez who knows Froch personally; I'm sure he'd be able to allay your fears or pass your concerns on.
Re: I fear for Froch's safety
GOmez is alright whoever he bums ![[icon_e_biggrin.gif] :D](./images/smilies/icon_e_biggrin.gif)
-
Kaaspeer
- Heavyweight

Re: I fear for Froch's safety
Well, Froch appears to be okay when he is speaking in interviews.