Is that ridiculous clash of heads rule still around?

Post Reply
Bard of Boxrec
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13114
Joined: 22 Feb 2002, 20:00

Is that ridiculous clash of heads rule still around?

Post by Bard of Boxrec »

I was looking through Herbie Hide's record just now and I was reminded he lost to a Lithuanian journeyman by TKO after he sustained a cut caused by an accidental clash of heads.

Does this ruling still exist in UK rings? It's absolutely baffling.
Benelio
Cruiserweight
Posts: 601
Joined: 02 May 2011, 05:57

Re: Is that ridiculous clash of heads rule still around?

Post by Benelio »

Goes to points if the fight lasts over 4 rounds. Prior to that, if the injured fighter can't continue, then it's a NC.
Bard of Boxrec
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13114
Joined: 22 Feb 2002, 20:00

Re: Is that ridiculous clash of heads rule still around?

Post by Bard of Boxrec »

Benelio wrote:Goes to points if the fight lasts over 4 rounds. Prior to that, if the injured fighter can't continue, then it's a NC.
Thanks. Does anyone know when the rule was changed?
The Law
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1949
Joined: 19 Feb 2005, 19:02

Re: Is that ridiculous clash of heads rule still around?

Post by The Law »

Riddick Blowe wrote:
Benelio wrote:Goes to points if the fight lasts over 4 rounds. Prior to that, if the injured fighter can't continue, then it's a NC.
Thanks. Does anyone know when the rule was changed?
I believe it changed in 2010. I remember it being changed whilst I was working for the board.
Boxing Prospect
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 6592
Joined: 25 Jun 2012, 14:35

Re: Is that ridiculous clash of heads rule still around?

Post by Boxing Prospect »

The Law wrote:
Riddick Blowe wrote:
Benelio wrote:Goes to points if the fight lasts over 4 rounds. Prior to that, if the injured fighter can't continue, then it's a NC.
Thanks. Does anyone know when the rule was changed?
I believe it changed in 2010. I remember it being changed whilst I was working for the board.
I think it was changed in the rule book in 2010 then brought into effect in 2011 following Bayaar/Edwards
ste1983
Middleweight
Posts: 1762
Joined: 01 Oct 2013, 10:30

Re: Is that ridiculous clash of heads rule still around?

Post by ste1983 »

Yeah 2011 I think it was changed
The Law
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1949
Joined: 19 Feb 2005, 19:02

Re: Is that ridiculous clash of heads rule still around?

Post by The Law »

Boxing Prospect wrote:
The Law wrote:
Riddick Blowe wrote:
Thanks. Does anyone know when the rule was changed?
I believe it changed in 2010. I remember it being changed whilst I was working for the board.
I think it was changed in the rule book in 2010 then brought into effect in 2011 following Bayaar/Edwards
That sounds about right
olij999
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1244
Joined: 14 Jun 2004, 08:22

Re: Is that ridiculous clash of heads rule still around?

Post by olij999 »

Benelio wrote:Goes to points if the fight lasts over 4 rounds. Prior to that, if the injured fighter can't continue, then it's a NC.
Benelio - that's right for some fights but not all - it depends on the scheduled distance. If the fight is scheduled for 8 rounds or more, then it goes to points if it ends after 4 rounds or more on an accidental foul. If it is a six rounder, then it goes to points after 3 rounds on an accidental foul, and if it is a four rounder, it goes to points after 2 rounds. See http://www.bbbofc.com/documentation, click on "Rules of Boxing", and then go to end of document (bottom of page 7 onwards for the section on Accidental Fouls and Intentional Fouls).

Hope that helps.
handsofstone
Cruiserweight
Posts: 23243
Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 17:28

Re: Is that ridiculous clash of heads rule still around?

Post by handsofstone »

I'm pretty sure most places including America its a NC if an accidental headclash happens before 4 rounds but here in the UK its a Tech draw.

Thats what happened with the first Quigg/Munroe fight and the first Rees/Mathews fight
GooalaShooola
Super Middleweight
Posts: 174
Joined: 11 May 2013, 18:40

Re: Is that ridiculous clash of heads rule still around?

Post by GooalaShooola »

handsofstone wrote:I'm pretty sure most places including America its a NC if an accidental headclash happens before 4 rounds but here in the UK its a Tech draw.

Thats what happened with the first Quigg/Munroe fight and the first Rees/Mathews fight
And Hall/Ward earlier this year.
Dan Dares
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1584
Joined: 29 Nov 2010, 16:33

Re: Is that ridiculous clash of heads rule still around?

Post by Dan Dares »

The Law wrote:
I believe it changed in 2010. I remember it being changed whilst I was working for the board.
I think it was changed in the rule book in 2010 then brought into effect in 2011 following Bayaar/Edwards[/quote]

That sounds about right[/quote]

I;m pretty sure this was the first time it was used

http://news.boxrec.com/2014/cadman-draw ... ble-airing
Post Reply