Is that ridiculous clash of heads rule still around?
-
Bard of Boxrec
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 13114
- Joined: 22 Feb 2002, 20:00
Is that ridiculous clash of heads rule still around?
I was looking through Herbie Hide's record just now and I was reminded he lost to a Lithuanian journeyman by TKO after he sustained a cut caused by an accidental clash of heads.
Does this ruling still exist in UK rings? It's absolutely baffling.
Does this ruling still exist in UK rings? It's absolutely baffling.
Re: Is that ridiculous clash of heads rule still around?
Goes to points if the fight lasts over 4 rounds. Prior to that, if the injured fighter can't continue, then it's a NC.
-
Bard of Boxrec
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 13114
- Joined: 22 Feb 2002, 20:00
Re: Is that ridiculous clash of heads rule still around?
Thanks. Does anyone know when the rule was changed?Benelio wrote:Goes to points if the fight lasts over 4 rounds. Prior to that, if the injured fighter can't continue, then it's a NC.
Re: Is that ridiculous clash of heads rule still around?
I believe it changed in 2010. I remember it being changed whilst I was working for the board.Riddick Blowe wrote:Thanks. Does anyone know when the rule was changed?Benelio wrote:Goes to points if the fight lasts over 4 rounds. Prior to that, if the injured fighter can't continue, then it's a NC.
-
Boxing Prospect
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 6592
- Joined: 25 Jun 2012, 14:35
Re: Is that ridiculous clash of heads rule still around?
I think it was changed in the rule book in 2010 then brought into effect in 2011 following Bayaar/EdwardsThe Law wrote:I believe it changed in 2010. I remember it being changed whilst I was working for the board.Riddick Blowe wrote:Thanks. Does anyone know when the rule was changed?Benelio wrote:Goes to points if the fight lasts over 4 rounds. Prior to that, if the injured fighter can't continue, then it's a NC.
Re: Is that ridiculous clash of heads rule still around?
Yeah 2011 I think it was changed
Re: Is that ridiculous clash of heads rule still around?
That sounds about rightBoxing Prospect wrote:I think it was changed in the rule book in 2010 then brought into effect in 2011 following Bayaar/EdwardsThe Law wrote:I believe it changed in 2010. I remember it being changed whilst I was working for the board.Riddick Blowe wrote:
Thanks. Does anyone know when the rule was changed?
Re: Is that ridiculous clash of heads rule still around?
Benelio - that's right for some fights but not all - it depends on the scheduled distance. If the fight is scheduled for 8 rounds or more, then it goes to points if it ends after 4 rounds or more on an accidental foul. If it is a six rounder, then it goes to points after 3 rounds on an accidental foul, and if it is a four rounder, it goes to points after 2 rounds. See http://www.bbbofc.com/documentation, click on "Rules of Boxing", and then go to end of document (bottom of page 7 onwards for the section on Accidental Fouls and Intentional Fouls).Benelio wrote:Goes to points if the fight lasts over 4 rounds. Prior to that, if the injured fighter can't continue, then it's a NC.
Hope that helps.
-
handsofstone
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 23243
- Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 17:28
Re: Is that ridiculous clash of heads rule still around?
I'm pretty sure most places including America its a NC if an accidental headclash happens before 4 rounds but here in the UK its a Tech draw.
Thats what happened with the first Quigg/Munroe fight and the first Rees/Mathews fight
Thats what happened with the first Quigg/Munroe fight and the first Rees/Mathews fight
-
GooalaShooola
- Super Middleweight
- Posts: 174
- Joined: 11 May 2013, 18:40
Re: Is that ridiculous clash of heads rule still around?
And Hall/Ward earlier this year.handsofstone wrote:I'm pretty sure most places including America its a NC if an accidental headclash happens before 4 rounds but here in the UK its a Tech draw.
Thats what happened with the first Quigg/Munroe fight and the first Rees/Mathews fight
Re: Is that ridiculous clash of heads rule still around?
I think it was changed in the rule book in 2010 then brought into effect in 2011 following Bayaar/Edwards[/quote]The Law wrote:
I believe it changed in 2010. I remember it being changed whilst I was working for the board.
That sounds about right[/quote]
I;m pretty sure this was the first time it was used
http://news.boxrec.com/2014/cadman-draw ... ble-airing