Jamie McDonnell v Komeda

Post Reply
jameswilson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13498
Joined: 08 Jan 2004, 18:01

Jamie McDonnell v Komeda

Post by jameswilson »

Terms agreed for them to fight in the New Year providing they both come through their November fights according to the latest IFL tv interview.

Thoughts?
Manchester Hitman
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 1263
Joined: 23 Aug 2012, 15:56

Re: Jamie McDonnell v Komeda

Post by Manchester Hitman »

jameswilson wrote:Terms agreed for them to fight in the New Year providing they both come through their November fights according to the latest IFL tv interview.

Thoughts?
Is the fight over here or is Hearn sending over another Brit for a beating?
If it's home advantage for Jaime then fair play to matchroom
Taansend
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 12075
Joined: 10 Jul 2004, 17:38

Re: Jamie McDonnell v Komeda

Post by Taansend »

Manchester Hitman wrote:
jameswilson wrote:Terms agreed for them to fight in the New Year providing they both come through their November fights according to the latest IFL tv interview.

Thoughts?
Is the fight over here or is Hearn sending over another Brit for a beating?
If it's home advantage for Jaime then fair play to matchroom
These are two TALL Banties. It will take me back to the 80's :OhYes:

This is a waste of a fight if they have it anywhere other than the UK or Japan. I know Kameda fights in the US & Mexico but the real money would have to be in the UK, possibly on the undercard of Brook Khan. Or Coyle Campbell.
rio
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1173
Joined: 22 Oct 2012, 16:48

Re: Jamie McDonnell v Komeda

Post by rio »

Which one? Koki or Tomoki? Tomoki is definitely the better and younger of the two which is why I think it wont be him. Koki looks very suspect, hes won 3 of his past 4 fights by SD despite having home advantage.
Taansend
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 12075
Joined: 10 Jul 2004, 17:38

Re: Jamie McDonnell v Komeda

Post by Taansend »

rio wrote:Which one? Koki or Tomoki? Tomoki is definitely the better and younger of the two which is why I think it wont be him. Koki looks very suspect, hes won 3 of his past 4 fights by SD despite having home advantage.
I was assuming Tomoki (El Mexicanito).
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: Jamie McDonnell v Komeda

Post by lefty »

Taansend wrote:
Manchester Hitman wrote:
jameswilson wrote:Terms agreed for them to fight in the New Year providing they both come through their November fights according to the latest IFL tv interview.

Thoughts?
Is the fight over here or is Hearn sending over another Brit for a beating?
If it's home advantage for Jaime then fair play to matchroom
These are two TALL Banties. It will take me back to the 80's :OhYes:

This is a waste of a fight if they have it anywhere other than the UK or Japan. I know Kameda fights in the US & Mexico but the real money would have to be in the UK, possibly on the undercard of Brook Khan. Or Coyle Campbell.
Why would the real money have to be over here? Hearn is not exactly known for splashing the cash.
mullenman
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1124
Joined: 23 Oct 2012, 11:10

Re: Jamie McDonnell v Komeda

Post by mullenman »

is there enough time to have it on the Froch undercard on the 31st of january??
Andrew
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 6108
Joined: 17 Jul 2012, 09:31

Re: Jamie McDonnell v Komeda

Post by Andrew »

I rate Kameda very highly from what I've seen and I think he will be too fast for McDonnell.
Taansend
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 12075
Joined: 10 Jul 2004, 17:38

Re: Jamie McDonnell v Komeda

Post by Taansend »

lefty wrote:
These are two TALL Banties. It will take me back to the 80's :OhYes:

This is a waste of a fight if they have it anywhere other than the UK or Japan. I know Kameda fights in the US & Mexico but the real money would have to be in the UK, possibly on the undercard of Brook Khan. Or Coyle Campbell.
Why would the real money have to be over here? Hearn is not exactly known for splashing the cash.[/quote]

Do you think they'd get more money fighting in the US or Mexico?
Yes We Can
Cruiserweight
Posts: 2087
Joined: 29 Sep 2010, 17:16

Re: Jamie McDonnell v Komeda

Post by Yes We Can »

Taansend wrote:
lefty wrote:
These are two TALL Banties. It will take me back to the 80's :OhYes:

This is a waste of a fight if they have it anywhere other than the UK or Japan. I know Kameda fights in the US & Mexico but the real money would have to be in the UK, possibly on the undercard of Brook Khan. Or Coyle Campbell.
Why would the real money have to be over here? Hearn is not exactly known for splashing the cash.
Do you think they'd get more money fighting in the US or Mexico?[/quote]

Jamie doesn't exactly bring money to the table. I don't care where the fight is, i tip my hat to the 2 fighters and the promoters making it happen especially Hearn as it is a very dangerous fight for a guy with a bet (even a paper one). Win this and Jamie is top3-4 P4P in this country.
Boxing Prospect
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 6592
Joined: 25 Jun 2012, 14:35

Re: Jamie McDonnell v Komeda

Post by Boxing Prospect »

Taansend wrote:
Manchester Hitman wrote:
jameswilson wrote:Terms agreed for them to fight in the New Year providing they both come through their November fights according to the latest IFL tv interview.

Thoughts?
Is the fight over here or is Hearn sending over another Brit for a beating?
If it's home advantage for Jaime then fair play to matchroom
These are two TALL Banties. It will take me back to the 80's :OhYes:

This is a waste of a fight if they have it anywhere other than the UK or Japan. I know Kameda fights in the US & Mexico but the real money would have to be in the UK, possibly on the undercard of Brook Khan. Or Coyle Campbell.
IT actually CAN'T be in Japan. It'll be here or the US.
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: Jamie McDonnell v Komeda

Post by lefty »

Boxing Prospect wrote:
Taansend wrote:
Manchester Hitman wrote:
Is the fight over here or is Hearn sending over another Brit for a beating?
If it's home advantage for Jaime then fair play to matchroom
These are two TALL Banties. It will take me back to the 80's :OhYes:

This is a waste of a fight if they have it anywhere other than the UK or Japan. I know Kameda fights in the US & Mexico but the real money would have to be in the UK, possibly on the undercard of Brook Khan. Or Coyle Campbell.
IT actually CAN'T be in Japan. It'll be here or the US.
Who is Kameda promoted by?
Boxing Prospect
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 6592
Joined: 25 Jun 2012, 14:35

Re: Jamie McDonnell v Komeda

Post by Boxing Prospect »

In the US he's one of Haymon's guys. As far as Japan goes he's not licensed as his old Gym (Kameda Gym) have been stripped of their licenses, a situation that really fucked up the year for Koki and for Kohei Kono.
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: Jamie McDonnell v Komeda

Post by lefty »

Boxing Prospect wrote:In the US he's one of Haymon's guys. As far as Japan goes he's not licensed as his old Gym (Kameda Gym) have been stripped of their licenses, a situation that really fucked up the year for Koki and for Kohei Kono.
Do you think it's more likely to be over here then versus the US?
Boxing Prospect
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 6592
Joined: 25 Jun 2012, 14:35

Re: Jamie McDonnell v Komeda

Post by Boxing Prospect »

Not sure, I think it depends whats on the table for Haymon. For what it's worth Kameda will come cheaply unless Haymon has big plans for.
Crease
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16873
Joined: 13 Oct 2005, 10:19

Re: Jamie McDonnell v Komeda

Post by Crease »

jameswilson wrote:Terms agreed for them to fight in the New Year providing they both come through their November fights
Who is McDonnell fighting in November? It doesn't say that he has a fight planned on his schedule.
Boxing Prospect
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 6592
Joined: 25 Jun 2012, 14:35

Re: Jamie McDonnell v Komeda

Post by Boxing Prospect »

Crease wrote:
jameswilson wrote:Terms agreed for them to fight in the New Year providing they both come through their November fights
Who is McDonnell fighting in November? It doesn't say that he has a fight planned on his schedule.
Could it be dependent on the result for Panomroonglek Kaiyanghadaogym's up coming bout? The Thai is apparently set to get a WBA title fight at 118 IF he wins his up coming contest

http://www.asianboxing.info/asian-news/ ... itle-fight
expe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 6871
Joined: 07 Oct 2012, 10:10

Re: Jamie McDonnell v Komeda

Post by expe »

Boxing Prospect wrote:
Crease wrote:
jameswilson wrote:Terms agreed for them to fight in the New Year providing they both come through their November fights
Who is McDonnell fighting in November? It doesn't say that he has a fight planned on his schedule.
Could it be dependent on the result for Panomroonglek Kaiyanghadaogym's up coming bout? The Thai is apparently set to get a WBA title fight at 118 IF he wins his up coming contest

http://www.asianboxing.info/asian-news/ ... itle-fight
John McDonald trying to pronounce that...
palooka
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 15698
Joined: 20 Jan 2012, 15:31

Re: Jamie McDonnell v Komeda

Post by palooka »

Could it be dependent on the result for Panomroonglek Kaiyanghadaogym's up coming bout? The Thai is apparently set to get a WBA title fight at 118 IF he wins his up coming contest

http://www.asianboxing.info/asian-news/ ... itle-fight[/quote]
John McDonald trying to pronounce that...[/quote]

:OhYes: 'Pluggaaahhh'
Boxing Prospect
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 6592
Joined: 25 Jun 2012, 14:35

Re: Jamie McDonnell v Komeda

Post by Boxing Prospect »

Panomroomglek won yesterday so don't be shocked if that's announced. There had been speculation last year that Tabtimdaeng would fight Payano so maybe last nights result threw a spanner in somewhere...
Post Reply