Bernard Taylor v. Chris John.

Post Reply
Rover
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 7323
Joined: 20 Aug 2011, 00:28

Bernard Taylor v. Chris John.

Post by Rover »

Two technicians going at it at feather. I'd be shocked if it doesn't go the distance. Who wins?
polecateddy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Bernard Taylor v. Chris John.

Post by polecateddy »

Taylor probably isn't the same level. John on points.
Rover
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 7323
Joined: 20 Aug 2011, 00:28

Re: Bernard Taylor v. Chris John.

Post by Rover »

polecateddy wrote:Taylor probably isn't the same level. John on points.
I'd go with John in a close fight, but Taylor was very good.
giacomino
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 15556
Joined: 14 Dec 2007, 19:33

Re: Bernard Taylor v. Chris John.

Post by giacomino »

Rover wrote:
polecateddy wrote:Taylor probably isn't the same level. John on points.
I'd go with John in a close fight, but Taylor was very good.
I agree with you, Rov. A lot of people on here didn't see Taylor when he fought. This would have been close. Taylor was very fast and had good skills, but IMO, couldn't beat the best of his era. I wouldn't pick John over prime Pedroza or McGuigan either, so I can't dock Taylor too much for not beating them (not sure Taylor didn't beat Pedroza, but it was an ugly chess match to watch). Taylor was faster than John and would have been a beltholder if he fought today
Rover
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 7323
Joined: 20 Aug 2011, 00:28

Re: Bernard Taylor v. Chris John.

Post by Rover »

giacomino wrote:
Rover wrote:
polecateddy wrote:Taylor probably isn't the same level. John on points.
I'd go with John in a close fight, but Taylor was very good.
I agree with you, Rov. A lot of people on here didn't see Taylor when he fought. This would have been close. Taylor was very fast and had good skills, but IMO, couldn't beat the best of his era. I wouldn't pick John over prime Pedroza or McGuigan either, so I can't dock Taylor too much for not beating them (not sure Taylor didn't beat Pedroza, but it was an ugly chess match to watch). Taylor was faster than John and would have been a beltholder if he fought today
I'd pick John over McGuigan but not prime Pedroza.
Nile4000
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7186
Joined: 17 Sep 2005, 15:21

Re: Bernard Taylor v. Chris John.

Post by Nile4000 »

giacomino wrote:
Rover wrote:
polecateddy wrote:Taylor probably isn't the same level. John on points.
I'd go with John in a close fight, but Taylor was very good.
I agree with you, Rov. A lot of people on here didn't see Taylor when he fought. This would have been close. Taylor was very fast and had good skills, but IMO, couldn't beat the best of his era. I wouldn't pick John over prime Pedroza or McGuigan either, so I can't dock Taylor too much for not beating them (not sure Taylor didn't beat Pedroza, but it was an ugly chess match to watch). Taylor was faster than John and would have been a beltholder if he fought today

He didn't fight most of the top comp of his era.It hurt his development, and Bernard probably stayed in the amateurs too long.
Woldemar
Super Welterweight
Posts: 6284
Joined: 03 Jul 2014, 07:52

Re: Bernard Taylor v. Chris John.

Post by Woldemar »

Taylor close decision.
Post Reply