As good as Adamek was? Or as good as he is now?Horse wrote:Solis has never beaten anyone as good as Adamek.
As he is now.JCS wrote:As good as Adamek was? Or as good as he is now?
It is not a poor argument at all. Solis has never beaten a top 15 ranked fighter. He does not deserve to be in the top 15. Has he ever beaten a top 20 or 30 ranked fighter either?JCS wrote:This is a poor argument though. Has Pulev beaten anyone in the Top 2 or 3? Has Povetkin? Has Pulev/Povetkin beaten Fury or Stiverne, or anyone as good as they are? No, but they're universally recognized #2 or #3 and higher ranked than Fury/Stiverne.
At the time of the fight with Rossy, Glazkov was distracted because his family (ethnic Russians living in East Ukraine) were in the middle of a war zone. Some militias were killing ethnic Russians in that area. He hadn't heard from his family members in a while because communications were cut off so he was very worried.marvelous marv wrote:I would send Glazkov down to 11. I saw him fight on the Hopkins-Kovalev undercard in an untelevised fight and he looked terrible. That's two fights in a row for where he hasn't looked good. Darnell Wilson came in literally 40 pounds overweight and decided to quit mid fight but was able to hit Glazkov when he wanted. He should have lost to Rossy last time out. Clearly he is not a world class challenger.
Thanks, I didn't know this had happened.Lackeos wrote:Btw, Glazkov should've been up for vote due to fight with Darnell Wilson on 11-08.
He deserves his place far more than Solis.Heretic wrote:Szpilka should not be anywhere near this list :geek2:
Well i guess we can drop him out after the next fight
Even the fat and unmotivated Solis would spank Szpilka in the ring.Horse wrote:He deserves his place far more than Solis.
Solis has never beaten anyone as good as Adamek.Heretic wrote:Even the fat and unmotivated Solis would spank Szpilka in the ring.
Do you think that he would have won against Larsen? Or gone full 12 with Thompson?
I don't think so :geek2:
Go watch the Mollo fights again
In reality, Solis deserved a narrow win and a narrow loss against Leif Larsen and Konstantin Airich. Szpilka would have clearly defeated both of them. Solis would have lost to Adamek. Solis got dominated by Thompson, there is no redeeming value in that. Szpilka may or may not be able to beat Thompson at this stage, but he would probably win more rounds than Solis did. Solis actually hasn't notched a single legitimate key win in his professional career, whereas Szpilka just got done picking-up a key win. Also, you seem to be judging Szpilka by fights he had before he got in shape and from when he was younger and more pre-prime.Heretic wrote:Even the fat and unmotivated Solis would spank Szpilka in the ring.Horse wrote:He deserves his place far more than Solis.
Do you think that he would have won against Larsen? Or gone full 12 with Thompson?
I don't think so :geek2:
Go watch the Mollo fights again
