The official Cleverly v Bellew in play discussion thread

Post Reply
rossij8
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 1746
Joined: 16 Jul 2012, 08:06

Re: The official Cleverly v Bellew in play discussion thread

Post by rossij8 »

jameswilson wrote:
rossij8 wrote:This is worse than predicted, and Im not sure that was possible
Are you gutted Quigg and Smith didn't iron their opponents out in 1?
Nope, would like to see a bit more coming back from opponents
Finn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5509
Joined: 07 May 2009, 15:56

Re: The official Cleverly v Bellew in play discussion thread

Post by Finn »

jameswilson wrote:
rossij8 wrote:This is worse than predicted, and Im not sure that was possible
Are you gutted Quigg and Smith didn't iron their opponents out in 1?
Smith do alright to be fair but quigg is putting in a very poor performance. You aren't going to beat frampton being 1 dimensional and sitting on his chest throwing shots. Where the jab?
rhino222
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6618
Joined: 09 Sep 2005, 09:38

Re: The official Cleverly v Bellew in play discussion thread

Post by rhino222 »

what a tough tough man....I can hear quiggs voice in his interview already!!
Glass Joe
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 5027
Joined: 08 Feb 2012, 10:29

Re: The official Cleverly v Bellew in play discussion thread

Post by Glass Joe »

Mathroom didn't have the budget for any decent opponents, hindside they should of had less names and better oppoents. lets hope degale and groves don't stink the place out.
jameswilson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13498
Joined: 08 Jan 2004, 18:01

Re: The official Cleverly v Bellew in play discussion thread

Post by jameswilson »

rossij8 wrote:
jameswilson wrote:
rossij8 wrote:This is worse than predicted, and Im not sure that was possible
Are you gutted Quigg and Smith didn't iron their opponents out in 1?
Nope, would like to see a bit more coming back from opponents
How did you have the McDonnell fight after 6 then? To say this guy isn't throwing back, I mean he doesn't have power, are you actually facing the right way watching the Quigg fight?
jameswilson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13498
Joined: 08 Jan 2004, 18:01

Re: The official Cleverly v Bellew in play discussion thread

Post by jameswilson »

Glass Joe wrote:Mathroom didn't have the budget for any decent opponents, hindside they should of had less names and better oppoents. lets hope degale and groves don't stink the place out.
Yeah it's rumoured Groves is being paid decent money. I would have liked to have seen him off the card with that money reinvested in the other fights.
rhino222
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6618
Joined: 09 Sep 2005, 09:38

Re: The official Cleverly v Bellew in play discussion thread

Post by rhino222 »

scott what??... what the hell did john macdonald just roar?
jameswilson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13498
Joined: 08 Jan 2004, 18:01

Re: The official Cleverly v Bellew in play discussion thread

Post by jameswilson »

rhino222 wrote:scott what??... what the hell did john macdonald just roar?
Same thing he roars when he is announcing anyone's sirname.
handsofstone
Cruiserweight
Posts: 23242
Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 17:28

Re: The official Cleverly v Bellew in play discussion thread

Post by handsofstone »

119-109

Apparrent pretty early that Quigg wasnt gona drop Otake,but Scott landed some hard shots to head and body that would make a lot of fighters crumble,Hidenori's one tough fellow

This cards gonna overlap the Pacquiao card at this rate
Joellucketti
Middleweight
Posts: 62
Joined: 30 Mar 2014, 06:28

Re: The official Cleverly v Bellew in play discussion thread

Post by Joellucketti »

My cousin rang me about 8 saying if he paid could he come up and watch it, I did my best to put him off and it worked lol. Hows it getting on im hearing boring so far??? Bring on next weekend
Boxerbeetle
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 32994
Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59

Re: The official Cleverly v Bellew in play discussion thread

Post by Boxerbeetle »

Glass Joe wrote:Mathroom didn't have the budget for any decent opponents, hindside they should of had less names and better oppoents. lets hope degale and groves don't stink the place out.
In hindsight??? You're either taking the piss or don't follow boxing - that's been said since day one.
jameswilson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13498
Joined: 08 Jan 2004, 18:01

Re: The official Cleverly v Bellew in play discussion thread

Post by jameswilson »

Joellucketti wrote:My cousin rang me about 8 saying if he paid could he come up and watch it, I did my best to put him off and it worked lol. Hows it getting on im hearing boring so far??? Bring on next weekend
Another one of Manchester Hitman's 40 post alter egos.
dookus
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4500
Joined: 17 May 2005, 06:00

Re: The official Cleverly v Bellew in play discussion thread

Post by dookus »

Also, on the "correct spelling of Otake" pedantry: Arguably there is a correct way to spell Otake in the Roman alphabet, because a) Japanese has far fewer sounds than English and, with only a couple of exceptions (e.g. the "f" in Japanese), they closely match their English equivalents; and b) there's an accepted way of transliterating Japanese words into romaji, the Hepburn romanization, which has been used for well over a century and is the accepted standard in Japan. I really should get out more but there are all these stacked boring undercards to get through first.
punchdrunkgench
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 8
Joined: 22 Feb 2010, 08:20

Re: The official Cleverly v Bellew in play discussion thread

Post by punchdrunkgench »

lol hearn getting the adverts out for groves degale 2 excluisevly on payfukinperview
handsofstone
Cruiserweight
Posts: 23242
Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 17:28

Re: The official Cleverly v Bellew in play discussion thread

Post by handsofstone »

My mates been out and had it paused,he's just text saying he's about to start the Smith/Sjekloca fight,poor pudendum,maybe i should tell him to ffw to now
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: The official Cleverly v Bellew in play discussion thread

Post by lefty »

dookus wrote:Also, on the "correct spelling of Otake" pedantry: Arguably there is a correct way to spell Otake in the Roman alphabet, because a) Japanese has far fewer sounds than English and, with only a couple of exceptions (e.g. the "f" in Japanese), they closely match their English equivalents; and b) there's an accepted way of transliterating Japanese words into romaji, the Hepburn romanization, which has been used for well over a century and is the accepted standard in Japan. I really should get out more but there are all these stacked boring undercards to get through first.
So is Otake the correct spelling then? lol
ShadrachSimmo
Cruiserweight
Posts: 4738
Joined: 20 Oct 2010, 05:42

Re: The official Cleverly v Bellew in play discussion thread

Post by ShadrachSimmo »

rhino222 wrote:scott what??... what the hell did john macdonald just roar?
Wiiiiiiiiiiiiiggg.....

Or something to that effect?
jameswilson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13498
Joined: 08 Jan 2004, 18:01

Re: The official Cleverly v Bellew in play discussion thread

Post by jameswilson »

punchdrunkgench wrote:lol hearn getting the adverts out for groves degale 2 excluisevly on payfukinperview
Given that your mate had their first fight on payperfukinview with Nathan Cleverly vs a binman as co-headliner and all.
Rexob
Middleweight
Posts: 6025
Joined: 20 Mar 2014, 15:17

Re: The official Cleverly v Bellew in play discussion thread

Post by Rexob »

That otakey fella was pretty tough eh!
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: The official Cleverly v Bellew in play discussion thread

Post by lefty »

This is a boring event so far. Sod paying for it lol
witherspoon
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1049
Joined: 26 Jun 2005, 11:17

Re: The official Cleverly v Bellew in play discussion thread

Post by witherspoon »

Sky commentating team is a joke. It was blatantly obvious that Quigg hurt his right hand early in the fight, it was plain as daylight the moment the injury occurred. It's bad enough that both commentators didn't pick that up, but Quigg didn't throw a full blooded right hand punch from about round 4 onwards and neither commentator noticed that? Come on.
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: The official Cleverly v Bellew in play discussion thread

Post by lefty »

This should be a pretty tough fight for Degale based on what ive seen of Periban upto now.
handsofstone
Cruiserweight
Posts: 23242
Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 17:28

Re: The official Cleverly v Bellew in play discussion thread

Post by handsofstone »

Degale/Periban no doubt will follow the tone of the night so far

Dominant but competitive yet also boring

Still a good match up for James though
Tarkus
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2859
Joined: 04 Jul 2010, 08:50

Re: The official Cleverly v Bellew in play discussion thread

Post by Tarkus »

The "world" champion unable to drop a Japanese tourists. On the other hand Eddie drops Rigos name as if...
Sklar
Middleweight
Posts: 5680
Joined: 21 Sep 2013, 09:06

Re: The official Cleverly v Bellew in play discussion thread

Post by Sklar »

Wouldja?
Post Reply