Nope, would like to see a bit more coming back from opponentsjameswilson wrote:Are you gutted Quigg and Smith didn't iron their opponents out in 1?rossij8 wrote:This is worse than predicted, and Im not sure that was possible
The official Cleverly v Bellew in play discussion thread
Re: The official Cleverly v Bellew in play discussion thread
Re: The official Cleverly v Bellew in play discussion thread
Smith do alright to be fair but quigg is putting in a very poor performance. You aren't going to beat frampton being 1 dimensional and sitting on his chest throwing shots. Where the jab?jameswilson wrote:Are you gutted Quigg and Smith didn't iron their opponents out in 1?rossij8 wrote:This is worse than predicted, and Im not sure that was possible
Re: The official Cleverly v Bellew in play discussion thread
what a tough tough man....I can hear quiggs voice in his interview already!!
Re: The official Cleverly v Bellew in play discussion thread
Mathroom didn't have the budget for any decent opponents, hindside they should of had less names and better oppoents. lets hope degale and groves don't stink the place out.
-
jameswilson
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 13498
- Joined: 08 Jan 2004, 18:01
Re: The official Cleverly v Bellew in play discussion thread
How did you have the McDonnell fight after 6 then? To say this guy isn't throwing back, I mean he doesn't have power, are you actually facing the right way watching the Quigg fight?rossij8 wrote:Nope, would like to see a bit more coming back from opponentsjameswilson wrote:Are you gutted Quigg and Smith didn't iron their opponents out in 1?rossij8 wrote:This is worse than predicted, and Im not sure that was possible
-
jameswilson
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 13498
- Joined: 08 Jan 2004, 18:01
Re: The official Cleverly v Bellew in play discussion thread
Yeah it's rumoured Groves is being paid decent money. I would have liked to have seen him off the card with that money reinvested in the other fights.Glass Joe wrote:Mathroom didn't have the budget for any decent opponents, hindside they should of had less names and better oppoents. lets hope degale and groves don't stink the place out.
Re: The official Cleverly v Bellew in play discussion thread
scott what??... what the hell did john macdonald just roar?
-
jameswilson
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 13498
- Joined: 08 Jan 2004, 18:01
Re: The official Cleverly v Bellew in play discussion thread
Same thing he roars when he is announcing anyone's sirname.rhino222 wrote:scott what??... what the hell did john macdonald just roar?
-
handsofstone
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 23241
- Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 17:28
Re: The official Cleverly v Bellew in play discussion thread
119-109
Apparrent pretty early that Quigg wasnt gona drop Otake,but Scott landed some hard shots to head and body that would make a lot of fighters crumble,Hidenori's one tough fellow
This cards gonna overlap the Pacquiao card at this rate
Apparrent pretty early that Quigg wasnt gona drop Otake,but Scott landed some hard shots to head and body that would make a lot of fighters crumble,Hidenori's one tough fellow
This cards gonna overlap the Pacquiao card at this rate
-
Joellucketti
- Middleweight
- Posts: 62
- Joined: 30 Mar 2014, 06:28
Re: The official Cleverly v Bellew in play discussion thread
My cousin rang me about 8 saying if he paid could he come up and watch it, I did my best to put him off and it worked lol. Hows it getting on im hearing boring so far??? Bring on next weekend
-
Boxerbeetle
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 32994
- Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59
Re: The official Cleverly v Bellew in play discussion thread
In hindsight??? You're either taking the piss or don't follow boxing - that's been said since day one.Glass Joe wrote:Mathroom didn't have the budget for any decent opponents, hindside they should of had less names and better oppoents. lets hope degale and groves don't stink the place out.
-
jameswilson
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 13498
- Joined: 08 Jan 2004, 18:01
Re: The official Cleverly v Bellew in play discussion thread
Another one of Manchester Hitman's 40 post alter egos.Joellucketti wrote:My cousin rang me about 8 saying if he paid could he come up and watch it, I did my best to put him off and it worked lol. Hows it getting on im hearing boring so far??? Bring on next weekend
Re: The official Cleverly v Bellew in play discussion thread
Also, on the "correct spelling of Otake" pedantry: Arguably there is a correct way to spell Otake in the Roman alphabet, because a) Japanese has far fewer sounds than English and, with only a couple of exceptions (e.g. the "f" in Japanese), they closely match their English equivalents; and b) there's an accepted way of transliterating Japanese words into romaji, the Hepburn romanization, which has been used for well over a century and is the accepted standard in Japan. I really should get out more but there are all these stacked boring undercards to get through first.
-
punchdrunkgench
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 8
- Joined: 22 Feb 2010, 08:20
Re: The official Cleverly v Bellew in play discussion thread
lol hearn getting the adverts out for groves degale 2 excluisevly on payfukinperview
-
handsofstone
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 23241
- Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 17:28
Re: The official Cleverly v Bellew in play discussion thread
My mates been out and had it paused,he's just text saying he's about to start the Smith/Sjekloca fight,poor pudendum,maybe i should tell him to ffw to now
Re: The official Cleverly v Bellew in play discussion thread
So is Otake the correct spelling then? loldookus wrote:Also, on the "correct spelling of Otake" pedantry: Arguably there is a correct way to spell Otake in the Roman alphabet, because a) Japanese has far fewer sounds than English and, with only a couple of exceptions (e.g. the "f" in Japanese), they closely match their English equivalents; and b) there's an accepted way of transliterating Japanese words into romaji, the Hepburn romanization, which has been used for well over a century and is the accepted standard in Japan. I really should get out more but there are all these stacked boring undercards to get through first.
-
ShadrachSimmo
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 4738
- Joined: 20 Oct 2010, 05:42
Re: The official Cleverly v Bellew in play discussion thread
Wiiiiiiiiiiiiiggg.....rhino222 wrote:scott what??... what the hell did john macdonald just roar?
Or something to that effect?
-
jameswilson
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 13498
- Joined: 08 Jan 2004, 18:01
Re: The official Cleverly v Bellew in play discussion thread
Given that your mate had their first fight on payperfukinview with Nathan Cleverly vs a binman as co-headliner and all.punchdrunkgench wrote:lol hearn getting the adverts out for groves degale 2 excluisevly on payfukinperview
Re: The official Cleverly v Bellew in play discussion thread
That otakey fella was pretty tough eh!
Re: The official Cleverly v Bellew in play discussion thread
This is a boring event so far. Sod paying for it lol
-
witherspoon
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1049
- Joined: 26 Jun 2005, 11:17
Re: The official Cleverly v Bellew in play discussion thread
Sky commentating team is a joke. It was blatantly obvious that Quigg hurt his right hand early in the fight, it was plain as daylight the moment the injury occurred. It's bad enough that both commentators didn't pick that up, but Quigg didn't throw a full blooded right hand punch from about round 4 onwards and neither commentator noticed that? Come on.
Re: The official Cleverly v Bellew in play discussion thread
This should be a pretty tough fight for Degale based on what ive seen of Periban upto now.
-
handsofstone
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 23241
- Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 17:28
Re: The official Cleverly v Bellew in play discussion thread
Degale/Periban no doubt will follow the tone of the night so far
Dominant but competitive yet also boring
Still a good match up for James though
Dominant but competitive yet also boring
Still a good match up for James though
Re: The official Cleverly v Bellew in play discussion thread
The "world" champion unable to drop a Japanese tourists. On the other hand Eddie drops Rigos name as if...