Horse wrote: You are just a hater.
When all arguments are lost.... resort to insults.

Horse wrote: You are just a hater.

When it comes to Groves you make a fool out of yourself.G0mez wrote:When all arguments are lost.... resort to insults.
Horse wrote:When it comes to Groves you make a fool out of yourself.G0mez wrote:When all arguments are lost.... resort to insults.
Groves is the only fighter that Froch has fought in the last 18 months and he lost more rounds than he won. If Groves is garbage then Froch is washed up.

I copy and paste it and I don't plan on thinking of you.G0mez wrote:When you type out next month's PFP list, make sure you type F R O C H nice and slow , and think of me, cupcake.
MarkMcBurney wrote:Yes...and my OPINION is that there was no doubt that Groves won a close decision.Fat Git wrote:No, I thought his victory was clear in a close fight. I didn't say he dominated, you're confusing yourself...MarkMcBurney wrote:
Opinions are, I thought DeGale won it, there was nothing clear about Groves win - a clear win would be 116-112 or a KO victory. Not two points difference between three judges.
A clear win simply means there is no confusion to who won the fight - as you can see, there are a lot of people who thought DeGale won the fight - so it wasn't a clear win - even the decision with the judges was a majority decision - so it is hardly a clear win.
clear adjective \ˈklir\
: very obvious : not causing or allowing doubt
: easily understood
: free from doubt or confusion
http://ask.reference.com/web?s=t&q=clea ... 91&o=10616
What don't you get about an opinion? I respect the fact that you have a different one but it doesn't change the fact that to me there was no doubt that Groves won.
Because it is a case of semantics - it is like saying x place is really near, but it is far. It can't be close but a clear winMarkMcBurney wrote:Jesus, if it's that time of the month Fat Git then maybe I should just agree with you. You're a touchy sod aren't you?
I thought there was no doubt that Groves won, you disagree. Where's the problem?