Eddie Fast Car on PPV

DMA1987
Cruiserweight
Posts: 2927
Joined: 04 Jun 2011, 17:05

Re: Eddie Fast Car on PPV

Post by DMA1987 »

Served it up to him there. Not really satisfied with the responses tbh, though I think the fact that he is at pains to say it isn't going to be that way in future shows the criticism must have been heard at Match room, however they try and front it out.
MrJasonM
Super Middleweight
Posts: 373
Joined: 26 Nov 2012, 15:14

Re: Eddie Fast Car on PPV

Post by MrJasonM »

Fast Car cant come out and say it wasnt or shouldnt have been PPV. He might be able to in the future, but he would get a rollicking off Sky if he admitted it was poor.
black panther
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4098
Joined: 11 Dec 2003, 07:06

Re: Eddie Fast Car on PPV

Post by black panther »

200k! That's bladdy good numbers. Damn it!
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Eddie Hearn

Post by lefty »

His take on the PPV event. Apparantly they did very good numbers http://www.boxingnewsonline.net/exclusi ... ge-fights/
palooka
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 15698
Joined: 20 Jan 2012, 15:31

Re: Eddie Hearn

Post by palooka »

If they try to serve up something similar as PPV then I'll not be buying again; I got a small buzz deciding, 'No' and sticking to it.
Boxerbeetle
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 32994
Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59

Re: Eddie Hearn

Post by Boxerbeetle »

I wouldn't read too much into that, just Eddie trying to put over his product as usual. He says the numbers were wildly above expectation, but expectation was surely at an all time low anyway. Something tells me the actual number of buys will be far too low to ever be confirmed publically...
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: Eddie Hearn

Post by lefty »

Doh :witzend: ... Sorry mate. A mod can close this if they want.
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: Eddie Hearn

Post by lefty »

Boxerbeetle wrote:I wouldn't read too much into that, just Eddie trying to put over his product as usual. He says the numbers were wildly above expectation, but expectation was surely at an all time low anyway. Something tells me the actual number of buys will be far too low to ever be confirmed publically...
At the bottom, Dont know if you saw it or not they reckon it might of done 200k buys.
Boxerbeetle
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 32994
Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59

Re: Eddie Hearn

Post by Boxerbeetle »

lefty wrote:
Boxerbeetle wrote:I wouldn't read too much into that, just Eddie trying to put over his product as usual. He says the numbers were wildly above expectation, but expectation was surely at an all time low anyway. Something tells me the actual number of buys will be far too low to ever be confirmed publically...
At the bottom, Dont know if you saw it or not they reckon it might of done 200k buys.
Where does that figure come from though? I'm guessing someone from Matchroom or Sky leaked it to make it seem the PPV was successful. I reckon they'd confirm if they sold that many.
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: Eddie Hearn

Post by lefty »

Boxerbeetle wrote:
lefty wrote:
Boxerbeetle wrote:I wouldn't read too much into that, just Eddie trying to put over his product as usual. He says the numbers were wildly above expectation, but expectation was surely at an all time low anyway. Something tells me the actual number of buys will be far too low to ever be confirmed publically...
At the bottom, Dont know if you saw it or not they reckon it might of done 200k buys.
Where does that figure come from though? I'm guessing someone from Matchroom or Sky leaked it to make it seem the PPV was successful. I reckon they'd confirm if they sold that many.
Yeah no idea. Not sure if it's a load of crap or not lol.
rossij8
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 1746
Joined: 16 Jul 2012, 08:06

Re: Eddie Hearn

Post by rossij8 »

Saw an Ed Robinson online earlier on here

Does anyone know if that was the one off Sky?
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: Eddie Hearn

Post by lefty »

rossij8 wrote:Saw an Ed Robinson online earlier on here

Does anyone know if that was the one off Sky?
Yeah it is. Ed reads the forum I think. Doesnt post a great deal I dont think but that's understandable. He cant come out and express his personal opinions because of his job and he's not sky's personal spokesman either.
rossij8
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 1746
Joined: 16 Jul 2012, 08:06

Re: Eddie Hearn

Post by rossij8 »

lefty wrote:
rossij8 wrote:Saw an Ed Robinson online earlier on here

Does anyone know if that was the one off Sky?
Yeah it is. Ed reads the forum I think. Doesnt post a great deal I dont think but that's understandable. He cant come out and express his personal opinions because of his job and he's not sky's personal spokesman either.
Cheers Lefty, that's good to know :TU:
Rexob
Middleweight
Posts: 6025
Joined: 20 Mar 2014, 15:17

Re: Eddie Hearn

Post by Rexob »

lefty wrote:
rossij8 wrote:Saw an Ed Robinson online earlier on here

Does anyone know if that was the one off Sky?
Yeah it is. Ed reads the forum I think. Doesnt post a great deal I dont think but that's understandable. He cant come out and express his personal opinions because of his job and he's not sky's personal spokesman either.
Why?
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: Eddie Hearn

Post by lefty »

Rexob wrote:
lefty wrote:
rossij8 wrote:Saw an Ed Robinson online earlier on here

Does anyone know if that was the one off Sky?
Yeah it is. Ed reads the forum I think. Doesnt post a great deal I dont think but that's understandable. He cant come out and express his personal opinions because of his job and he's not sky's personal spokesman either.
Why?
You'd have to ask him that mate.
Rexob
Middleweight
Posts: 6025
Joined: 20 Mar 2014, 15:17

Re: Eddie Hearn

Post by Rexob »

Does anyone know if that was the one off Sky?[/quote]
Yeah it is. Ed reads the forum I think. Doesnt post a great deal I dont think but that's understandable. He cant come out and express his personal opinions because of his job and he's not sky's personal spokesman either.[/quote]

Why?[/quote]
You'd have to ask him that mate.[/quote]

;;-) :lol:
Boxing Prospect
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 6592
Joined: 25 Jun 2012, 14:35

Re: Eddie Hearn

Post by Boxing Prospect »

Is it just me who thinks that is need of the blokes one The Apprentice looks like Eddie Hearn? You know, the deluded guy..
tony1234
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2185
Joined: 15 Sep 2009, 10:02

Re: Eddie Hearn

Post by tony1234 »

Usually Charles Sale's column in the Mail is good for PPV figures and that sort of thing
broomy7s
Cruiserweight
Posts: 971
Joined: 19 May 2011, 07:53

Re: Eddie Hearn

Post by broomy7s »

If it's done 200k then that is unreal and I hope Bellew and Clev had a percentage deal otherwise sky and matchroom are quids in.
Boxerbeetle
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 32994
Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59

Re: Eddie Hearn

Post by Boxerbeetle »

Even if they did miraculously get 200k buys, I reckon 180k of those wouldn't buy another PPV unless it was Mayweather vs Pacquiao or something - a lot of people will have been feeling very sore on Sunday after paying for that pile of sh!t.

As George W Bush always said: "'Fool me once, shame on...shame on you. Fool me — you can't get fooled again."
Tomasino
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7876
Joined: 24 Apr 2010, 16:39

Re: Eddie Hearn

Post by Tomasino »

palooka wrote:If they try to serve up something similar as PPV then I'll not be buying again; I got a small buzz deciding, 'No' and sticking to it.

I got that Buzz too, not just from this but all the PPV shite I've turned down. Sky's a noose round the neck, the prices they charge for 99%shite is terrible. I've seen what I wanted to see of the bill for sweet FA and even if I hadn't I couldn't care less. I called it being a total stinker anyway. All that shouting and slavering from Bellew said it all. The best do the damage in the ring.

Kovalev would best both on the same night, I'd wager at the same time.
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: Eddie Hearn

Post by lefty »

Tomasino wrote:
palooka wrote:If they try to serve up something similar as PPV then I'll not be buying again; I got a small buzz deciding, 'No' and sticking to it.

I got that Buzz too, not just from this but all the PPV shite I've turned down. Sky's a noose round the neck, the prices they charge for 99%shite is terrible. I've seen what I wanted to see of the bill for sweet FA and even if I hadn't I couldn't care less. I called it being a total stinker anyway. All that shouting and slavering from Bellew said it all. The best do the damage in the ring.

Kovalev would best both on the same night, I'd wager at the same time.
Haha i wonder if that could ever catch on ..... tag team boxing or a handicap match. One man is taken a whooping so he tags his partner to take his place. Interesting concept and you never know- could get people interested :lol:
chiggsy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1387
Joined: 12 Feb 2010, 03:09

Re: Eddie Fast Car on PPV

Post by chiggsy »

'' It was just average, and people want more than average, and that’s the bottom line.''


But you thought you'd be cheeky and put it on ppv anyway eh frank?...cough cough i mean eddie :witzend:
UrbanFox
Middleweight
Posts: 152
Joined: 16 Aug 2014, 08:47

Re: Eddie Fast Car on PPV

Post by UrbanFox »

I am very disappointed with Eddie on this one.

I thought he had learnt from his father's mistakes. Clearly he hasn't and is only looking to make quick cash on a short-term basis.
Post Reply