Mauricio Herrera
Mauricio Herrera
This poor guy.
This "sport" SUCKS.
SUCKS.
This "sport" SUCKS.
SUCKS.
Re: Mauricio Herrera
Laughable cards and all too predictable.
I had it 116-112 Herrera.
I had it 116-112 Herrera.
Re: Mauricio Herrera
I didn't see much of this fight, but Russian commentators called the decision absurd.
Re: Mauricio Herrera
3 years ago i would have been "upset", now im like "meh"
not suprised anymore, like i said, is a corrupt sport.
all other sports have one ruling body, football, cricket, atheletics, but not boxing
If athletics were having multiple bodies there would be multiple 100m champions (although we'd know who was fastest). yes more people caught doping in athletics but reason is its not covered up or ignored like in boxing. boxing has different drug testing formats.
not suprised anymore, like i said, is a corrupt sport.
all other sports have one ruling body, football, cricket, atheletics, but not boxing
If athletics were having multiple bodies there would be multiple 100m champions (although we'd know who was fastest). yes more people caught doping in athletics but reason is its not covered up or ignored like in boxing. boxing has different drug testing formats.
-
kidbazooka1
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 959
- Joined: 14 Dec 2007, 13:56
Re: Mauricio Herrera
Feel for Herrera he should have had two big wins this year instead he gets two very bad robberies.
Re: Mauricio Herrera
Had it 115-114 to Herrera was a close entertaining fight Benavidez gave away the first four easily for me but improved afterwards.
Agreed the judges cards were digusting.
Agreed the judges cards were digusting.
-
zorndeslammes
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 537
- Joined: 01 Jul 2007, 00:21
Re: Mauricio Herrera
I actually thought Benavidez won. Credit to Herrera for being tough in there and sticking through it, but from about round 4 on, Benavidez was landing the best shots by far. Yeah, Herrera might have landed more punches in some rounds, but Benavidez's punches clearly did more damage and forced Herrera to take counter offensives that were rarely effective.
Re: Mauricio Herrera
Garbage decision!!
-
handsofstone
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 23089
- Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 17:28
Re: Mauricio Herrera
I didnt score the fight but felt that Herrera done enough outhustling early on to win it on points
Re: Mauricio Herrera
Robbed again.
American judging is possibly the worst in the world.
American judging is possibly the worst in the world.
Re: Mauricio Herrera
Depends on your definition of 'worst'.Horse wrote:Robbed again.
American judging is possibly the worst in the world.
We've got some bad outliers, but on averages, I'd say far from it.
Re: Mauricio Herrera
Yesterday's bunch of awful decisions show that it is not "far from it". Robbing foreigners is "normal" for all countries, but how Bradley was robbed shows that corruption/dirty money is most likely involved.JCS wrote:Depends on your definition of 'worst'.Horse wrote:Robbed again.
American judging is possibly the worst in the world.
We've got some bad outliers, but on averages, I'd say far from it.
Re: Mauricio Herrera
Horse wrote:Robbed again.
American judging is possibly the worst in the world.
Were all the judges in the Garcia vs Herrera fight American???
Re: Mauricio Herrera
I had it 115-114 benevidez. The round I scored even I probably would have given to benevidez if I had to pick. While the scores were too wide, the result was fair imo.