Mauricio Herrera

Post Reply
diddy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4900
Joined: 14 Apr 2009, 01:42

Mauricio Herrera

Post by diddy »

This poor guy.

This "sport" SUCKS.





SUCKS.
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: Mauricio Herrera

Post by crusader »

Laughable cards and all too predictable.

I had it 116-112 Herrera.
ikorolev
Middleweight
Posts: 4895
Joined: 21 Sep 2013, 19:08

Re: Mauricio Herrera

Post by ikorolev »

I didn't see much of this fight, but Russian commentators called the decision absurd.
cold187
Middleweight
Posts: 742
Joined: 24 Nov 2013, 08:51

Re: Mauricio Herrera

Post by cold187 »

3 years ago i would have been "upset", now im like "meh"

not suprised anymore, like i said, is a corrupt sport.

all other sports have one ruling body, football, cricket, atheletics, but not boxing

If athletics were having multiple bodies there would be multiple 100m champions (although we'd know who was fastest). yes more people caught doping in athletics but reason is its not covered up or ignored like in boxing. boxing has different drug testing formats.
kidbazooka1
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 959
Joined: 14 Dec 2007, 13:56

Re: Mauricio Herrera

Post by kidbazooka1 »

Feel for Herrera he should have had two big wins this year instead he gets two very bad robberies.
Andrew
Super Middleweight
Posts: 6108
Joined: 17 Jul 2012, 09:31

Re: Mauricio Herrera

Post by Andrew »

Had it 115-114 to Herrera was a close entertaining fight Benavidez gave away the first four easily for me but improved afterwards.

Agreed the judges cards were digusting.
Rodian
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Mauricio Herrera

Post by Rodian »

Herrera should try fighting in another country
zorndeslammes
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 537
Joined: 01 Jul 2007, 00:21

Re: Mauricio Herrera

Post by zorndeslammes »

I actually thought Benavidez won. Credit to Herrera for being tough in there and sticking through it, but from about round 4 on, Benavidez was landing the best shots by far. Yeah, Herrera might have landed more punches in some rounds, but Benavidez's punches clearly did more damage and forced Herrera to take counter offensives that were rarely effective.
KBB
Super Welterweight
Posts: 2809
Joined: 11 Oct 2014, 23:33

Re: Mauricio Herrera

Post by KBB »

Garbage decision!!
handsofstone
Cruiserweight
Posts: 23089
Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 17:28

Re: Mauricio Herrera

Post by handsofstone »

I didnt score the fight but felt that Herrera done enough outhustling early on to win it on points
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22334
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Mauricio Herrera

Post by Horse »

Robbed again.

American judging is possibly the worst in the world.
JCS
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6246
Joined: 17 Dec 2004, 13:27

Re: Mauricio Herrera

Post by JCS »

Horse wrote:Robbed again.

American judging is possibly the worst in the world.
Depends on your definition of 'worst'.

We've got some bad outliers, but on averages, I'd say far from it.
ikorolev
Middleweight
Posts: 4895
Joined: 21 Sep 2013, 19:08

Re: Mauricio Herrera

Post by ikorolev »

JCS wrote:
Horse wrote:Robbed again.

American judging is possibly the worst in the world.
Depends on your definition of 'worst'.

We've got some bad outliers, but on averages, I'd say far from it.
Yesterday's bunch of awful decisions show that it is not "far from it". Robbing foreigners is "normal" for all countries, but how Bradley was robbed shows that corruption/dirty money is most likely involved.
KBB
Super Welterweight
Posts: 2809
Joined: 11 Oct 2014, 23:33

Re: Mauricio Herrera

Post by KBB »

Horse wrote:Robbed again.

American judging is possibly the worst in the world.

Were all the judges in the Garcia vs Herrera fight American???
jockpunk
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 524
Joined: 28 Oct 2005, 16:20

Re: Mauricio Herrera

Post by jockpunk »

I had it 115-114 benevidez. The round I scored even I probably would have given to benevidez if I had to pick. While the scores were too wide, the result was fair imo.
Post Reply