Frampton Reach
Frampton Reach
His stats are listed as height 5 ft 5 in (1.65 m) and reach 62 in (157 cm). Very unusual to see a boxer with reach shorter than their height.
His arms don't look that short; anyone know if that's the right measurement?
His arms don't look that short; anyone know if that's the right measurement?
Re: Frampton Reach
Yes, he has noticeably short arms, I've often noted this and when discussing the Quigg fight I alwaysJ-C wrote:His stats are listed as height 5 ft 5 in (1.65 m) and reach 62 in (157 cm). Very unusual to see a boxer with reach shorter than their height.
His arms don't look that short; anyone know if that's the right measurement?
state that this would be a significant disadvantage tho I'm confident he would still be the win
Re: Frampton Reach
Well I guess it saves him a few quid when it comes to buying drinks?danal2 wrote:Yes, he has noticeably short arms, I've often noted this and when discussing the Quigg fight I alwaysJ-C wrote:His stats are listed as height 5 ft 5 in (1.65 m) and reach 62 in (157 cm). Very unusual to see a boxer with reach shorter than their height.
His arms don't look that short; anyone know if that's the right measurement?
state that this would be a significant disadvantage tho I'm confident he would still be the win
-
slapbangwhallop
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 2031
- Joined: 13 Dec 2010, 08:27
Re: Frampton Reach
I didn't nickname him T-Rex for nowt.
Luckily he's got sharp footwork that makes up for it.
Luckily he's got sharp footwork that makes up for it.
Re: Frampton Reach
With the right style, shorter arms can be made to work to a fighter's advantage. Julio Cesar Chavez, Meldrick Taylor, Yuriorkis Gamboa and Roberto Duran all had reaches slightly shorter than their heights, which may be one reason why they could get off such quick combinations. Shorter arms also often come with short, stocky legs (Hamed, Pac), which is one way of generating power.
Proportionally (being as he's a small guy) Frampton's height to reach ratio is a big discrepancy, assuming the figures are right. But it hasn't seemed to cause him any issues so far.
If he does right Rigondeaux, who looks to have bloody long arms, it might be one of the biggest relative differences in reach ever.
Proportionally (being as he's a small guy) Frampton's height to reach ratio is a big discrepancy, assuming the figures are right. But it hasn't seemed to cause him any issues so far.
If he does right Rigondeaux, who looks to have bloody long arms, it might be one of the biggest relative differences in reach ever.
Re: Frampton Reach
He's probably more like 5'3" rather than 5'5".
Looked 3-4" shorter than 5'7" Steve Molitor when they did the weigh in for that fight.
Looked 3-4" shorter than 5'7" Steve Molitor when they did the weigh in for that fight.
Re: Frampton Reach
It's been scientifically proven that having short arms benefits power punchers because of the short arc of their punches. Hence Marciano, for example.danal2 wrote:Yes, he has noticeably short arms
-
Counter-puncher
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 39141
- Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41
Re: Frampton Reach
indeed. hence Tommy Hearns, Bob Foster, and Alexis Arguello, to name but 3Crease wrote:It's been scientifically proven that having short arms benefits power punchers because of the short arc of their punches. Hence Marciano, for example.danal2 wrote:Yes, he has noticeably short arms
-
Datsue
- Heavyweight

Re: Frampton Reach
Counter-puncher wrote:indeed. hence Tommy Hearns, Bob Foster, and Alexis Arguello, to name but 3Crease wrote:It's been scientifically proven that having short arms benefits power punchers because of the short arc of their punches. Hence Marciano, for example.danal2 wrote:Yes, he has noticeably short arms
Thanks mate, I was gonna intrude on Crease's Marciano Fanboy Wank-fest again but didn't quite have the heart for it today...
-
reggaereggae
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 4723
- Joined: 21 Dec 2009, 17:01
Re: Frampton Reach
I'm not sure about his arms. But I saw him in a cafe once and he has an ENORMOUS heid!
Re: Frampton Reach
Everyone's physicality is different. The above three men might have long arms and has great power, but who is to say that they wouldn't have carried their power better had they shortened their punches. You look at the likes of; Ricky Hatton, Mike Tyson and Steve Collins - they fought on the inside, because it benefitted their own strengths, because it shortened the arc of their punches and the amount of distance that the punch has to travel before it makes its impact.Counter-puncher wrote:indeed. hence Tommy Hearns, Bob Foster, and Alexis Arguello, to name but 3
-
lillywhite14
- Heavyweight

Re: Frampton Reach
Hatton and Collins were hardly murderous punchersCrease wrote:Everyone's physicality is different. The above three men might have long arms and has great power, but who is to say that they wouldn't have carried their power better had they shortened their punches. You look at the likes of; Ricky Hatton, Mike Tyson and Steve Collins - they fought on the inside, because it benefitted their own strengths, because it shortened the arc of their punches and the amount of distance that the punch has to travel before it makes its impact.Counter-puncher wrote:indeed. hence Tommy Hearns, Bob Foster, and Alexis Arguello, to name but 3
-
Counter-puncher
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 39141
- Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41
Re: Frampton Reach
professors of physics or biomechanics, for a start.Crease wrote:Everyone's physicality is different. The above three men might have long arms and has great power, but who is to say that they wouldn't have carried their power better had they shortened their punches?Counter-puncher wrote:indeed. hence Tommy Hearns, Bob Foster, and Alexis Arguello, to name but 3