I think Haymon signed him for all-Polish fight against Szpilka in Chicago, but you can never exclude another Rod Salka-type title defense for Haymon's fighter. I hope Wilder fights someone decent like Lucas Browne but most likely it will be Al Haymon's fighter.crusader wrote:Hmm....seems like an odd signing if he's not being lined up for Wilder. He's also extremely chinny and would an ideal opponent for Wilder to score a highlight-reel KO.Boxing Writer wrote:I just hope it's not Andrzey Wawrzyk, whom Haymon signed a couple of days ago.
Wilder first defence???
-
Boxing Writer
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 1347
- Joined: 27 Oct 2011, 16:45
Re: Wilder first defence???
Re: Wilder first defence???
Think it will be Shannon Briggs to be honest
Re: Wilder first defence???
i could imagine that all arreola's title shots alreadyzorndeslammes wrote:I think Arreola/Wilder for that heavyweight strap could sell on NBC and at the gate if it was put in Southern California.
happened. i am at least very sure no one wants to
see a brave man like him being butchered by wilder.
Re: Wilder first defence???
no way.LancashireLoyal wrote:Think it will be Shannon Briggs to be honest
Re: Wilder first defence???
If Briggs follows Wilder about like he does Wlad it will go off like Hide and Bentt.
Re: Wilder first defence???
LancashireLoyal wrote:Think it will be Shannon Briggs to be honest
LET'S GO CHAMP!
Re: Wilder first defence???
keirw wrote:LancashireLoyal wrote:Think it will be Shannon Briggs to be honestimagine if Briggs won........
LET'S GO CHAMP!
Re: Wilder first defence???
Wilder would only have to mention random blood testing and Briggs would go away.Jpreisser wrote:keirw wrote:LancashireLoyal wrote:Think it will be Shannon Briggs to be honestimagine if Briggs won........
LET'S GO CHAMP!On twitter Briggs called him Beyonce Wilder.
Fury talks a lot of crap, but doesn't seem in a hurry to fight Wilder - even as bad as he says Wilder is. Fury will fight Hammer next, then goes on to say he will fight Wilder after he (Fury) beats Wlad. He said he is 3 or 4 fights away from unifying all the belts. So in other words, he won't fight Wilder unless he beats Wlad, and a couple of other bums in-between.
-
sucracristo
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 1828
- Joined: 24 Dec 2011, 23:47
Re: Wilder first defence???
this. someone will magically appear in the top 15, like the ibf always does, as soon as we hearfergusg wrote:I honestly believe that Wilder will be granted, by the WBC, a voluntary defence of his title against a cab driver type opponent or a fellow Al Haymon fighter.
rumors of them being suggested as a voluntary wilder defense. maybe it will be one of those
garcia-salka type garbage cards to fill a date, but everyone will get paid. wilder will be handled
very carefully, with the goal of an eventual big unification with vlad in vegas. they need to build
him up though into a ppv star. i'd like to see wilder vs fury, but fury has a pulse so that won't
happen
-
Michael bennt
- Heavyweight

The rumours and names floating about
Of Deontay Wilders first title defence, Travis Brown, Tyson Fury, Gerald Washington and Artur Szpilka
Thoughts ?
Thoughts ?
-
HitBattousai
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 36
- Joined: 25 May 2008, 02:12
Re: The rumours and names floating about
Fury would be fine, the rest not so much.
-
ReggieDiggs
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3126
- Joined: 05 Jun 2010, 10:37
Re: The rumours and names floating about
Artur is with Al so I'm guessing he's on the short list. Al can pick up all these mfers by the time I've finished my post though so maybe that don't even matter.
I'm hoping Al will deal with people who he doesn't have signed to him, but I mean who gots an advisor anyway so he could grab damn near anyone cuz few got advisors. I think the whole reason he's picking up so many cats is exactly cuz no one gots an advisor.
I'm hoping Al will deal with people who he doesn't have signed to him, but I mean who gots an advisor anyway so he could grab damn near anyone cuz few got advisors. I think the whole reason he's picking up so many cats is exactly cuz no one gots an advisor.
-
ReggieDiggs
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3126
- Joined: 05 Jun 2010, 10:37
Re: The rumours and names floating about
It sounds like Wlad wants Tyson soon too, Wlad was bringing up Tyson when Bryant was iffy on their Apr. fight. If I'm Tyson I'm probably waiting on Wladimir in Aug/Sept vs facing Deontay in May/June. Getting more money & more upside. Can always fight Deontay later win or lose vs Wlad.HitBattousai wrote:Fury would be fine, the rest not so much.
-
Freedom2013
- Super Middleweight
- Posts: 3879
- Joined: 26 Nov 2012, 11:35
Re: The rumours and names floating about
Travis Brown?Michael bennt wrote:Of Deontay Wilders first title defence, Travis Brown, Tyson Fury, Gerald Washington and Artur Szpilka
Thoughts ?
You mean Travis Kaufmann? He would be a nice easy defense for Wilder.
I'd love to see Fury-Wilder, but I doubt that happens for a while.
Re: Wilder first defence???
sucracristo wrote:this. someone will magically appear in the top 15, like the ibf always does, as soon as we hearfergusg wrote:I honestly believe that Wilder will be granted, by the WBC, a voluntary defence of his title against a cab driver type opponent or a fellow Al Haymon fighter.
rumors of them being suggested as a voluntary wilder defense. maybe it will be one of those
garcia-salka type garbage cards to fill a date, but everyone will get paid. wilder will be handled
very carefully, with the goal of an eventual big unification with vlad in vegas. they need to build
him up though into a ppv star. i'd like to see wilder vs fury, but fury has a pulse so that won't
happen
I thought he has the WBC belt?
I would LOVE for Wilder to KO Fury, but that's not going to happen for a while. I am sure his first defense will come against some fringe guy that will get KOd in 1-4 rounds.
Re: The rumours and names floating about
Lucas Browne?
-
Looking On
- Super Middleweight
- Posts: 927
- Joined: 12 Oct 2012, 13:50
Re: Wilder first defence???
My bet would be Glazkov, but dont be surprised to see David Haye come out of the Woodwork screaming for a title shot
Re: Wilder first defence???
I would LOVE to see his next fight be against Tarver. That's a win-win for me because i'd love to see both men lose. So i'm guaranteed one will but with my luck, it will be a draw. One thing i do know, Wilder will not fight 4 times a year like he said in his post fight interview. He'll ride this train and i think it will be at least two years before we see him fight someone substantial.
-
ReggieDiggs
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3126
- Joined: 05 Jun 2010, 10:37
Re: Wilder first defence???
Jpreisser wrote:keirw wrote:LancashireLoyal wrote:Think it will be Shannon Briggs to be honestimagine if Briggs won........
LET'S GO CHAMP!On twitter Briggs called him Beyonce Wilder.
Re: Wilder first defence???
mike perez would be a decent fight
perez is good but wilder should out gun him and Ko him
perez is good but wilder should out gun him and Ko him
-
pound per pound
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1605
- Joined: 13 Jan 2005, 14:36
Re: Wilder first defence???
Whomever offers the least risk with the largest reward.J.P wrote:Surely v USA next best who is ???
Maybe Briggs.
-
jujigatame
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 7478
- Joined: 30 Oct 2004, 21:08
Re: Wilder first defence???
Glazkov has to get past Cunningham first, but if he does, I'll be pleased if he gets the first crack at Wilder. Definitely a more compelling fight than Arreola or Szpilka.
-
Matt in a hat
- Middleweight
- Posts: 13
- Joined: 17 Feb 2014, 11:42
Re: Wilder first defence???
I say Szpilka first, then he'll be in a corner, unless he is granted another voluntary.
Eventually Wlad though. Fury is less reward than Wlad, but more beatable.
Eventually Wlad though. Fury is less reward than Wlad, but more beatable.