Mayweather v manny is ON ( Edit: Not )
-
1 nut
- Heavyweight

Mayweather v manny is ON ( Edit: Not )
He is announcing his fight at tonight's superbowl . The is no reason to announce a fight at the biggest sporting calendar event in th U.S ! He would look stupid if it wasn't .
Finally we have it
Finally we have it
-
Boxerbeetle
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 32991
- Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59
Re: Mayweather v manny is ON
I'm booking my flight right now on the strength of this concrete evidence.
-
1 nut
- Heavyweight

Re: Mayweather v manny is ON
Good idea in a few hours they will be double or treble the price
-
Parson Cross
- Super Middleweight
- Posts: 1991
- Joined: 03 Dec 2012, 18:57
Re: Mayweather v manny is ON
Wow didn't see that coming. Thanks for the heads up.
Re: Mayweather v manny is ON
YEAH? WHO CARES!? WAKE ME UP WHEN TOMMY COYLE VS LUKE CAMPBELL IS MADE!
Re: Mayweather v manny is ON
That American thing did happen. Where is announcement?
Re: Mayweather v manny is ON
They made Tommy Coyle vs Luke Campbell?!?!?
Is Mayweather Pacquiao on the undercard?
Is Mayweather Pacquiao on the undercard?
-
mickey1975
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 23177
- Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54
Re: Mayweather v manny is ON
It should be. Campbell-Coyle will be more exciting.Taansend wrote:They made Tommy Coyle vs Luke Campbell?!?!?
Is Mayweather Pacquiao on the undercard?
Re: Mayweather v manny is ON
Campbell/Coyle is what the fans really want. Take my PPV money now.
-
mickey1975
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 23177
- Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54
Re: Mayweather v manny is ON
No, he'll leave that on Sky as a treat for us, never forgetting to remind us. The people of Hull will make up for it with a 20,000+ live gate(I'm not joking).seanilius wrote:Campbell/Coyle is what the fans really want. Take my PPV money now.
-
Parson Cross
- Super Middleweight
- Posts: 1991
- Joined: 03 Dec 2012, 18:57
Re: Mayweather v manny is ON
1 nut suddenly seems appropriate.
-
Monte Fisto
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 2978
- Joined: 23 Jan 2011, 15:36
Re: Mayweather v manny is ON
And that may have just burst
Re: Mayweather v manny is ON
Tuan_Jim wrote:1 nut hath spake.
-
1 nut
- Heavyweight

Re: Mayweather v manny is ON ( Edit: Not )
I meant it will be announced this week , sorry for the delay ha ha ha ha ha
-
Parson Cross
- Super Middleweight
- Posts: 1991
- Joined: 03 Dec 2012, 18:57
Re: Mayweather v manny is ON ( Edit: Not )
and if it's not ?
-
Monte Fisto
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 2978
- Joined: 23 Jan 2011, 15:36
Re: Mayweather v manny is ON ( Edit: Not )
He will have minus 1 nut, and change his name to negative nut. It's so sad that this fight can't be made. So sad
-
LivingWithDixon
- Super Welterweight
- Posts: 32
- Joined: 04 Feb 2015, 12:27
Re: Mayweather v manny is ON
Ask Nietzsche1 nut wrote:What's hath spake mean ?