Mayweather v manny is ON ( Edit: Not )

Post Reply
1 nut
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Mayweather v manny is ON ( Edit: Not )

Post by 1 nut »

He is announcing his fight at tonight's superbowl . The is no reason to announce a fight at the biggest sporting calendar event in th U.S ! He would look stupid if it wasn't .
Finally we have it
Boxerbeetle
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 32992
Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59

Re: Mayweather v manny is ON

Post by Boxerbeetle »

I'm booking my flight right now on the strength of this concrete evidence.
Tuan_Jim
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Mayweather v manny is ON

Post by Tuan_Jim »

1 nut hath spake.
1 nut
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Mayweather v manny is ON

Post by 1 nut »

Good idea in a few hours they will be double or treble the price
1 nut
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Mayweather v manny is ON

Post by 1 nut »

What's hath spake mean ?
Parson Cross
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1991
Joined: 03 Dec 2012, 18:57

Re: Mayweather v manny is ON

Post by Parson Cross »

Wow didn't see that coming. Thanks for the heads up.
seanilius
Middleweight
Posts: 140
Joined: 27 Jun 2014, 14:38

Re: Mayweather v manny is ON

Post by seanilius »

YEAH? WHO CARES!? WAKE ME UP WHEN TOMMY COYLE VS LUKE CAMPBELL IS MADE!
Tarkus
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2859
Joined: 04 Jul 2010, 08:50

Re: Mayweather v manny is ON

Post by Tarkus »

That American thing did happen. Where is announcement?
Taansend
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 12070
Joined: 10 Jul 2004, 17:38

Re: Mayweather v manny is ON

Post by Taansend »

They made Tommy Coyle vs Luke Campbell?!?!?

Is Mayweather Pacquiao on the undercard?
mickey1975
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 23180
Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54

Re: Mayweather v manny is ON

Post by mickey1975 »

Taansend wrote:They made Tommy Coyle vs Luke Campbell?!?!?

Is Mayweather Pacquiao on the undercard?
It should be. Campbell-Coyle will be more exciting.
seanilius
Middleweight
Posts: 140
Joined: 27 Jun 2014, 14:38

Re: Mayweather v manny is ON

Post by seanilius »

Campbell/Coyle is what the fans really want. Take my PPV money now.
mickey1975
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 23180
Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54

Re: Mayweather v manny is ON

Post by mickey1975 »

seanilius wrote:Campbell/Coyle is what the fans really want. Take my PPV money now.
No, he'll leave that on Sky as a treat for us, never forgetting to remind us. The people of Hull will make up for it with a 20,000+ live gate(I'm not joking).
Parson Cross
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1991
Joined: 03 Dec 2012, 18:57

Re: Mayweather v manny is ON

Post by Parson Cross »

1 nut suddenly seems appropriate.
Monte Fisto
Cruiserweight
Posts: 2978
Joined: 23 Jan 2011, 15:36

Re: Mayweather v manny is ON

Post by Monte Fisto »

And that may have just burst
seanilius
Middleweight
Posts: 140
Joined: 27 Jun 2014, 14:38

Re: Mayweather v manny is ON

Post by seanilius »

:DDD
Tuan_Jim wrote:1 nut hath spake.
1 nut
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Mayweather v manny is ON ( Edit: Not )

Post by 1 nut »

I meant it will be announced this week , sorry for the delay ha ha ha ha ha
Parson Cross
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1991
Joined: 03 Dec 2012, 18:57

Re: Mayweather v manny is ON ( Edit: Not )

Post by Parson Cross »

and if it's not ?
Monte Fisto
Cruiserweight
Posts: 2978
Joined: 23 Jan 2011, 15:36

Re: Mayweather v manny is ON ( Edit: Not )

Post by Monte Fisto »

He will have minus 1 nut, and change his name to negative nut. It's so sad that this fight can't be made. So sad
LivingWithDixon
Super Welterweight
Posts: 32
Joined: 04 Feb 2015, 12:27

Re: Mayweather v manny is ON

Post by LivingWithDixon »

1 nut wrote:What's hath spake mean ?
Ask Nietzsche
Post Reply