NDAM V STURM'- Why not Sam

Post Reply
amwsnw
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1911
Joined: 19 Oct 2007, 03:24

NDAM V STURM'- Why not Sam

Post by amwsnw »

Can anyone give me an update regarding Sam Soliman's physical condition or his boxing future?
The IBF have ordered Sturm and Ndam fight for their vacant middleweight belt which was held by Sam until he was beaten by Taylor after injury his leg.
Sturms last fight was at Super Middle and he seems o be chasing some money fights at that weight.
I would have thought Soliman v Ndam would have been the obvious, if Sam is willing and able.
AntonS
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6406
Joined: 16 Sep 2003, 04:38

Re: NDAM V STURM'- Why not Sam

Post by AntonS »

IBF nor any other organization can ORDER who contests vacant title

In this case title is exactly that, as is #2 spot, which indicates elimination bout is required to fill it & subsequent winner will do battle with #1
Sam is currently rated #7, which may or may not qualify him to contest eliminator.
However, if he's got a promoter to do it, no doubt IBF will come good - Sanction $ is a $ ;;-)
Sweet P
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3669
Joined: 23 Mar 2003, 04:18

Re: NDAM V STURM'- Why not Sam

Post by Sweet P »

I'm pretty sure the top 2 highest ranked fighter's are offered the title shot. If either refuses it gets offered to next in line. And goes on until 2 eligible boxers can contest it.
The 2 highest are Ndam at #1 and Sturm at #3.
bogan whisperer
Middleweight
Posts: 1668
Joined: 15 Aug 2013, 19:24

Re: NDAM V STURM'- Why not Sam

Post by bogan whisperer »

amwsnw wrote:Can anyone give me an update regarding Sam Soliman's physical condition or his boxing future?
The IBF have ordered Sturm and Ndam fight for their vacant middleweight belt which was held by Sam until he was beaten by Taylor after injury his leg.
Sturms last fight was at Super Middle and he seems o be chasing some money fights at that weight.
I would have thought Soliman v Ndam would have been the obvious, if Sam is willing and able.
There are no-nothings here like Da Goose who claim Soliman threw the fight against Taylor by feinting his injury. Perhaps you should ask them :lol:
DA GOOSE
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1160
Joined: 06 Jan 2013, 01:48

Re: NDAM V STURM'- Why not Sam

Post by DA GOOSE »

Soliman feigned the injury not feinted it :doh: N'Dam and Sturm are the 2 highest ranked contenders.

http://content.usatoday.com/sportsdata/ ... f-rankings

Sam is ranked 7th. Money has a lot to do with it IMO.
amwsnw
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1911
Joined: 19 Oct 2007, 03:24

Re: NDAM V STURM'- Why not Sam

Post by amwsnw »

Im not going to get into an argument regarding the claims Sams injury was BS!! Can anyone tell me how he is recovering.
AntonS
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6406
Joined: 16 Sep 2003, 04:38

Re: NDAM V STURM'- Why not Sam

Post by AntonS »

Sweet P wrote:I'm pretty sure the top 2 highest ranked fighter's are offered the title shot. If either refuses it gets offered to next in line. And goes on until 2 eligible boxers can contest it.
The 2 highest are Ndam at #1 and Sturm at #3.
Fail to understand vacant contenders spots. e.g. Ganoy vs Angulo - IBF lightweight eliminator for #2 spot in 2008 http://boxrec.com/list_bouts.php?human_ ... &cat=boxer Angulo stopped Ganoy in 4th & filled the spot albeit was over the weight limit. In the end it was waste of sanction $$$
buster007
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1899
Joined: 11 Oct 2007, 00:58

Re: NDAM V STURM'- Why not Sam

Post by buster007 »

da goose is just trolling.

u r wasting your time having a proper discussion with the fool.
bogan whisperer
Middleweight
Posts: 1668
Joined: 15 Aug 2013, 19:24

Re: NDAM V STURM'- Why not Sam

Post by bogan whisperer »

buster007 wrote:da goose is just trolling.

u r wasting your time having a proper discussion with the fool.
He still thinks Soliman threw the Taylor fight :lol:

That is an indictment on his sanity ;;-)
ClivePatrickLyons
Super Welterweight
Posts: 2811
Joined: 07 Aug 2014, 22:10

Re: NDAM V STURM'- Why not Sam

Post by ClivePatrickLyons »

DA GOOSE wrote:Soliman feigned the injury not feinted it :doh: N'Dam and Sturm are the 2 highest ranked contenders.

http://content.usatoday.com/sportsdata/ ... f-rankings

Sam is ranked 7th. Money has a lot to do with it IMO.
MY GOD YOU REALLY NEED HELP, YOU SHOULD GO TO MELBOURNE SEE SAM AND TELL HIM TO HIS FACE WHAT U THINK
GO ON I DARE U. :lol:
buster007
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1899
Joined: 11 Oct 2007, 00:58

Re: NDAM V STURM'- Why not Sam

Post by buster007 »

he doesn't think that.

he's just trolling.

he thinks it makes him look cool ffs.

he is a try hard fool, lol.
bogan whisperer
Middleweight
Posts: 1668
Joined: 15 Aug 2013, 19:24

Re: NDAM V STURM'- Why not Sam

Post by bogan whisperer »

buster007 wrote:he doesn't think that.

he's just trolling.

he thinks it makes him look cool ffs.

he is a try hard fool, lol.
Much like you seem to be doing elsewhere today. Not sure why you felt the need to stick your beak in over there? You are only further encouraging the trolls by siding with them.

I'm just stirring up a hornet's nest over there and now I'm just going to walk away and leave them to it :lol:
buster007
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1899
Joined: 11 Oct 2007, 00:58

Re: NDAM V STURM'- Why not Sam

Post by buster007 »

not siding with anyone. they r grubs.

I put up with u for a while cause u were giving it to the trolls, but now u r as bad as them.

there is too much trolling there and u r helping to keep it festering.
bogan whisperer
Middleweight
Posts: 1668
Joined: 15 Aug 2013, 19:24

Re: NDAM V STURM'- Why not Sam

Post by bogan whisperer »

buster007 wrote:not siding with anyone. they r grubs.

I put up with u for a while cause u were giving it to the trolls, but now u r as bad as them.

there is too much trolling there and u r helping to keep it festering.
That forum is beyond repair. I can't believe you have posted there for years because you just get stomped daily. It's embarrassing to watch.

I tried to discuss boxing there initially. But it was a pointless exercise. Then I decided to give as good as I got for a while. But having decided 'the place is a total waste of time for discussing boxing I just gave them heaps and walked away. They will remain in a frenzy for days. Meanwhile I'll just sit back and laugh at them. Couldn't care whether I post there again or not :lol:
buster007
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1899
Joined: 11 Oct 2007, 00:58

Re: NDAM V STURM'- Why not Sam

Post by buster007 »

u got banned huh?

lol.
bogan whisperer
Middleweight
Posts: 1668
Joined: 15 Aug 2013, 19:24

Re: NDAM V STURM'- Why not Sam

Post by bogan whisperer »

buster007 wrote:u got banned huh?

lol.
:lol: I doubt it. Nobody gets banned from there :lol:

The trolls there break every rule of decency known to man and don't get banned. As if they'd ban me :doh:
DA GOOSE
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1160
Joined: 06 Jan 2013, 01:48

Re: NDAM V STURM'- Why not Sam

Post by DA GOOSE »

Sturm has said no. BJS has said no if David Lemieux says no Sam could get a shot.
amwsnw
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1911
Joined: 19 Oct 2007, 03:24

Re: NDAM V STURM'- Why not Sam

Post by amwsnw »

let's hope that happens. Is Sam back in training yet?
dberry
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3350
Joined: 05 Jan 2010, 02:15

Re: NDAM V STURM'- Why not Sam

Post by dberry »

amwsnw wrote:let's hope that happens. Is Sam back in training yet?
Yes.
Post Reply