NDAM V STURM'- Why not Sam
NDAM V STURM'- Why not Sam
Can anyone give me an update regarding Sam Soliman's physical condition or his boxing future?
The IBF have ordered Sturm and Ndam fight for their vacant middleweight belt which was held by Sam until he was beaten by Taylor after injury his leg.
Sturms last fight was at Super Middle and he seems o be chasing some money fights at that weight.
I would have thought Soliman v Ndam would have been the obvious, if Sam is willing and able.
The IBF have ordered Sturm and Ndam fight for their vacant middleweight belt which was held by Sam until he was beaten by Taylor after injury his leg.
Sturms last fight was at Super Middle and he seems o be chasing some money fights at that weight.
I would have thought Soliman v Ndam would have been the obvious, if Sam is willing and able.
Re: NDAM V STURM'- Why not Sam
IBF nor any other organization can ORDER who contests vacant title
In this case title is exactly that, as is #2 spot, which indicates elimination bout is required to fill it & subsequent winner will do battle with #1
Sam is currently rated #7, which may or may not qualify him to contest eliminator.
However, if he's got a promoter to do it, no doubt IBF will come good - Sanction $ is a $ ;;-)
In this case title is exactly that, as is #2 spot, which indicates elimination bout is required to fill it & subsequent winner will do battle with #1
Sam is currently rated #7, which may or may not qualify him to contest eliminator.
However, if he's got a promoter to do it, no doubt IBF will come good - Sanction $ is a $ ;;-)
Re: NDAM V STURM'- Why not Sam
I'm pretty sure the top 2 highest ranked fighter's are offered the title shot. If either refuses it gets offered to next in line. And goes on until 2 eligible boxers can contest it.
The 2 highest are Ndam at #1 and Sturm at #3.
The 2 highest are Ndam at #1 and Sturm at #3.
-
bogan whisperer
- Middleweight
- Posts: 1668
- Joined: 15 Aug 2013, 19:24
Re: NDAM V STURM'- Why not Sam
There are no-nothings here like Da Goose who claim Soliman threw the fight against Taylor by feinting his injury. Perhaps you should ask themamwsnw wrote:Can anyone give me an update regarding Sam Soliman's physical condition or his boxing future?
The IBF have ordered Sturm and Ndam fight for their vacant middleweight belt which was held by Sam until he was beaten by Taylor after injury his leg.
Sturms last fight was at Super Middle and he seems o be chasing some money fights at that weight.
I would have thought Soliman v Ndam would have been the obvious, if Sam is willing and able.
Re: NDAM V STURM'- Why not Sam
Soliman feigned the injury not feinted it
N'Dam and Sturm are the 2 highest ranked contenders.
http://content.usatoday.com/sportsdata/ ... f-rankings
Sam is ranked 7th. Money has a lot to do with it IMO.
http://content.usatoday.com/sportsdata/ ... f-rankings
Sam is ranked 7th. Money has a lot to do with it IMO.
Re: NDAM V STURM'- Why not Sam
Im not going to get into an argument regarding the claims Sams injury was BS!! Can anyone tell me how he is recovering.
Re: NDAM V STURM'- Why not Sam
Fail to understand vacant contenders spots. e.g. Ganoy vs Angulo - IBF lightweight eliminator for #2 spot in 2008 http://boxrec.com/list_bouts.php?human_ ... &cat=boxer Angulo stopped Ganoy in 4th & filled the spot albeit was over the weight limit. In the end it was waste of sanction $$$Sweet P wrote:I'm pretty sure the top 2 highest ranked fighter's are offered the title shot. If either refuses it gets offered to next in line. And goes on until 2 eligible boxers can contest it.
The 2 highest are Ndam at #1 and Sturm at #3.
Re: NDAM V STURM'- Why not Sam
da goose is just trolling.
u r wasting your time having a proper discussion with the fool.
u r wasting your time having a proper discussion with the fool.
-
bogan whisperer
- Middleweight
- Posts: 1668
- Joined: 15 Aug 2013, 19:24
Re: NDAM V STURM'- Why not Sam
He still thinks Soliman threw the Taylor fightbuster007 wrote:da goose is just trolling.
u r wasting your time having a proper discussion with the fool.
That is an indictment on his sanity ;;-)
-
ClivePatrickLyons
- Super Welterweight
- Posts: 2811
- Joined: 07 Aug 2014, 22:10
Re: NDAM V STURM'- Why not Sam
MY GOD YOU REALLY NEED HELP, YOU SHOULD GO TO MELBOURNE SEE SAM AND TELL HIM TO HIS FACE WHAT U THINKDA GOOSE wrote:Soliman feigned the injury not feinted itN'Dam and Sturm are the 2 highest ranked contenders.
http://content.usatoday.com/sportsdata/ ... f-rankings
Sam is ranked 7th. Money has a lot to do with it IMO.
GO ON I DARE U.
Re: NDAM V STURM'- Why not Sam
he doesn't think that.
he's just trolling.
he thinks it makes him look cool ffs.
he is a try hard fool, lol.
he's just trolling.
he thinks it makes him look cool ffs.
he is a try hard fool, lol.
-
bogan whisperer
- Middleweight
- Posts: 1668
- Joined: 15 Aug 2013, 19:24
Re: NDAM V STURM'- Why not Sam
Much like you seem to be doing elsewhere today. Not sure why you felt the need to stick your beak in over there? You are only further encouraging the trolls by siding with them.buster007 wrote:he doesn't think that.
he's just trolling.
he thinks it makes him look cool ffs.
he is a try hard fool, lol.
I'm just stirring up a hornet's nest over there and now I'm just going to walk away and leave them to it
Re: NDAM V STURM'- Why not Sam
not siding with anyone. they r grubs.
I put up with u for a while cause u were giving it to the trolls, but now u r as bad as them.
there is too much trolling there and u r helping to keep it festering.
I put up with u for a while cause u were giving it to the trolls, but now u r as bad as them.
there is too much trolling there and u r helping to keep it festering.
-
bogan whisperer
- Middleweight
- Posts: 1668
- Joined: 15 Aug 2013, 19:24
Re: NDAM V STURM'- Why not Sam
That forum is beyond repair. I can't believe you have posted there for years because you just get stomped daily. It's embarrassing to watch.buster007 wrote:not siding with anyone. they r grubs.
I put up with u for a while cause u were giving it to the trolls, but now u r as bad as them.
there is too much trolling there and u r helping to keep it festering.
I tried to discuss boxing there initially. But it was a pointless exercise. Then I decided to give as good as I got for a while. But having decided 'the place is a total waste of time for discussing boxing I just gave them heaps and walked away. They will remain in a frenzy for days. Meanwhile I'll just sit back and laugh at them. Couldn't care whether I post there again or not
Re: NDAM V STURM'- Why not Sam
u got banned huh?
lol.
lol.
-
bogan whisperer
- Middleweight
- Posts: 1668
- Joined: 15 Aug 2013, 19:24
Re: NDAM V STURM'- Why not Sam
buster007 wrote:u got banned huh?
lol.
The trolls there break every rule of decency known to man and don't get banned. As if they'd ban me
Re: NDAM V STURM'- Why not Sam
Sturm has said no. BJS has said no if David Lemieux says no Sam could get a shot.
Re: NDAM V STURM'- Why not Sam
let's hope that happens. Is Sam back in training yet?
Re: NDAM V STURM'- Why not Sam
Yes.amwsnw wrote:let's hope that happens. Is Sam back in training yet?