Terry Flanagan v Steve Ormond

Baboon
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1185
Joined: 25 Feb 2008, 17:00

Re: Terry Flanagan v Steve Ormond

Post by Baboon »

Got Flanagan 1,2,5 and Ormond 3 & 4

48-47 F

Flanagan needs to keep using his feet, far more effective. As soon as he goes toe to toe, Ormond is the boss.
Boxing Prospect
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 6592
Joined: 25 Jun 2012, 14:35

Re: Terry Flanagan v Steve Ormond

Post by Boxing Prospect »

Incredibly close fight, 3-2 either way through 5 or even 2-2-1
reggaereggae
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4723
Joined: 21 Dec 2009, 17:01

Re: Terry Flanagan v Steve Ormond

Post by reggaereggae »

,I think the majority of Flanaghan's shots are getting blocked on the gloves.

Facially Ormond looks old though
Baboon
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1185
Joined: 25 Feb 2008, 17:00

Re: Terry Flanagan v Steve Ormond

Post by Baboon »

Boxing Prospect wrote:Incredibly close fight, 3-2 either way through 5 or even 2-2-1
Agree. Going to be interesting to see who fades first. Style wise it should be Flanagan, but he has some engine.
The Insider
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 2581
Joined: 26 Mar 2012, 11:21

Re: Terry Flanagan v Steve Ormond

Post by The Insider »

Ormand for the stoppage!!!!

Close fightyet. yet
Baboon
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1185
Joined: 25 Feb 2008, 17:00

Re: Terry Flanagan v Steve Ormond

Post by Baboon »

6th Ormond, 7th Flanagan. 67-66 F. Close rounds again though. Ormond landing bigger single shots, but Flanagan has the volume.
GlobalBox
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2037
Joined: 10 Jun 2007, 02:57

Re: Terry Flanagan v Steve Ormond

Post by GlobalBox »

Sounds a good fight no pics yet for me is it 10 or 12 rounds guys
Boxing Prospect
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 6592
Joined: 25 Jun 2012, 14:35

Re: Terry Flanagan v Steve Ormond

Post by Boxing Prospect »

Could well have had 2 or 3 even rounds now...great stuff...Hey Matchroom, this is what fans want!
Andrew
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 6108
Joined: 17 Jul 2012, 09:31

Re: Terry Flanagan v Steve Ormond

Post by Andrew »

Nothing in this championship rounds are going to decide it.
Baboon
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1185
Joined: 25 Feb 2008, 17:00

Re: Terry Flanagan v Steve Ormond

Post by Baboon »

GlobalBox wrote:Sounds a good fight no pics yet for me is it 10 or 12 rounds guys
12 according to allegedly.
expe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 6871
Joined: 07 Oct 2012, 10:10

Re: Terry Flanagan v Steve Ormond

Post by expe »

Level after 8 on my card.
Boxing Prospect
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 6592
Joined: 25 Jun 2012, 14:35

Re: Terry Flanagan v Steve Ormond

Post by Boxing Prospect »

Odds closing now, brilliant fight...so much action :D
reggaereggae
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4723
Joined: 21 Dec 2009, 17:01

Re: Terry Flanagan v Steve Ormond

Post by reggaereggae »

I actually think Ormond in ahead by a couple or more rounds. He blocks most of Flannagan's shots
GlobalBox
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2037
Joined: 10 Jun 2007, 02:57

Re: Terry Flanagan v Steve Ormond

Post by GlobalBox »

Baboon wrote:
GlobalBox wrote:Sounds a good fight no pics yet for me is it 10 or 12 rounds guys
12 according to allegedly.
Thanks mate
Baboon
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1185
Joined: 25 Feb 2008, 17:00

Re: Terry Flanagan v Steve Ormond

Post by Baboon »

Ormond losing the head here. Stuck the nut in twice. Point off for the first one.
Boxing Prospect
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 6592
Joined: 25 Jun 2012, 14:35

Re: Terry Flanagan v Steve Ormond

Post by Boxing Prospect »

Very harsh point deduction...referee is fornicating this up especially considering the fact he hasn't been warning Flanagan for the holding...AWFUL officiating again in a British ring!
expe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 6871
Joined: 07 Oct 2012, 10:10

Re: Terry Flanagan v Steve Ormond

Post by expe »

Boxing Prospect wrote:Very harsh point deduction...referee is effing this up especially considering the fact he hasn't been warning Flanagan for the holding...AWFUL officiating again in a British ring!
Not scoring that, bullshit point deduction, Flanagan can hold him all he wants, sticks the head in and a point comes off, situations like this I wouldn't blame Ormond if he chinned Steve Gray.
Baboon
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1185
Joined: 25 Feb 2008, 17:00

Re: Terry Flanagan v Steve Ormond

Post by Baboon »

Boxing Prospect wrote:Very harsh point deduction...referee is effing this up especially considering the fact he hasn't been warning Flanagan for the holding...AWFUL officiating again in a British ring!
Yes, he should have dealt with the holding. He probably deserved a point off by the thrid time he stuck the head in, but a warning for the 1st one would have made more sense.
Andrew
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 6108
Joined: 17 Jul 2012, 09:31

Re: Terry Flanagan v Steve Ormond

Post by Andrew »

Boxing Prospect wrote:Very harsh point deduction...referee is effing this up especially considering the fact he hasn't been warning Flanagan for the holding...AWFUL officiating again in a British ring!
Was three times could have been DQ'd
Boxing Prospect
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 6592
Joined: 25 Jun 2012, 14:35

Re: Terry Flanagan v Steve Ormond

Post by Boxing Prospect »

Naandrew wrote:
Boxing Prospect wrote:Very harsh point deduction...referee is effing this up especially considering the fact he hasn't been warning Flanagan for the holding...AWFUL officiating again in a British ring!
Was three times could have been DQ'd
True but taking a point for the first one was stupid, and continuing to allow the holding wasn't helping matters...
Baboon
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1185
Joined: 25 Feb 2008, 17:00

Re: Terry Flanagan v Steve Ormond

Post by Baboon »

87-83 to Flanagan (with the point off).........christ he's just been Dq'd
expe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 6871
Joined: 07 Oct 2012, 10:10

Re: Terry Flanagan v Steve Ormond

Post by expe »

Steve Gray has cost Ormond that fight, Ormond should knock him cold now, one rule for one and a different one for the other, fornicating fuming at that. Gray, IJL, Edwards and O'Connor shouldn't be allowed to officiate in a British ring again.
Baboon
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1185
Joined: 25 Feb 2008, 17:00

Re: Terry Flanagan v Steve Ormond

Post by Baboon »

Just watched that last one again. Blatant. What a tool. He was still in the fight.
reggaereggae
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4723
Joined: 21 Dec 2009, 17:01

Re: Terry Flanagan v Steve Ormond

Post by reggaereggae »

Flanagan is always first to hold.
ShadrachSimmo
Cruiserweight
Posts: 4738
Joined: 20 Oct 2010, 05:42

Re: Terry Flanagan v Steve Ormond

Post by ShadrachSimmo »

Very disappointing from Ormond he was still well in the fight when he started all the bullsh1t with the head.

Flannigan was taking over though and prob a few rounds ahead.
Post Reply