Frankie Gavin v Chris Van Heerden

Tastethepain
Super Welterweight
Posts: 21
Joined: 18 Feb 2015, 17:19

Re: Frankie Gavin v Chris Van Heerden

Post by Tastethepain »

palooka wrote:Warren he done a good job with Gavin and Hearn has picked him up at a high level, he doesn't need to slide back though that Van Heerden looked plenty strong and capable v Matthew Hatton.
True, I do think Gavin wins this easily though
powderPuff
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 65
Joined: 08 Nov 2005, 11:38

Re: Frankie Gavin v Chris Van Heerden

Post by powderPuff »

You boys are really still just annoyed about the clev v bellew ppv so look for any reason to criticise now :zzz:
expe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 6871
Joined: 07 Oct 2012, 10:10

Re: Frankie Gavin v Chris Van Heerden

Post by expe »

powderPuff wrote:You boys are really still just annoyed about the clev v bellew ppv so look for any reason to criticise now :zzz:
Lots of good responses to your posts, don't know how to respond, so you come out with a childish comment :zzz:
powderPuff
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 65
Joined: 08 Nov 2005, 11:38

Re: Frankie Gavin v Chris Van Heerden

Post by powderPuff »

Yes you got me I apologise
This forum thing gets me so frustrated when people don't agree with me :salut:
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: Frankie Gavin v Chris Van Heerden

Post by crusader »

Seems to me like they're probably on the same level...pretty good match-up in my opinion.
seanilius
Super Welterweight
Posts: 140
Joined: 27 Jun 2014, 14:38

Re: Frankie Gavin v Chris Van Heerden

Post by seanilius »

Van Heerden looks to be on a similar level to Denton Vassell. I think this one is quite interesting actually. Gavin and Van Heerden are Euro level at best and there is nothing wrong with that. Everyone bleating on about him stepping up need to realise that he will only get a hiding if he does. If he gets through Van Heerden he'll probably fight Brook, get beat and get paid. Nout wrong with that.
Fair play to Matchroom on this one. I'll be tuning in.
Boxerbeetle
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 32661
Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59

Re: Frankie Gavin v Chris Van Heerden

Post by Boxerbeetle »

I don't think it's a terrible fight by any means, although it is pretty underwhelming. Strongly agree that Gavin could move down a weight though, I know he keeps saying he can't, but maybe his camp should start insisting he tries to give it a proper go.
Marlo Stanfield
Middleweight
Posts: 447
Joined: 17 Dec 2013, 14:38

Re: Frankie Gavin v Chris Van Heerden

Post by Marlo Stanfield »

He's overweight
ste1983
Middleweight
Posts: 1759
Joined: 01 Oct 2013, 10:30

Re: Frankie Gavin v Chris Van Heerden

Post by ste1983 »

freddydoesdallas wrote:
powderPuff wrote:Yes he is

Why not?
He's not a recognised name and his best win is Matthew hatton a few years back in a fight that's best remembered for the fella singing 'eye of the tiger'!

I would be very impressed if 10k tickets get shifted for this
being set up for 8k I think (read somewhere).

Think it'll do ok, the brummies are getting excited by an arena show. You know the type that couldn't be arsed to get a 15 min train to Wolverhampton for his fight against Bundu but will be all over this (cuz its on Sky)....those people don't really care about opponents do they.

Peaky Blinder caps and Zulu chants galore!
ScottDetonator
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1073
Joined: 15 Mar 2011, 04:33

Re: Frankie Gavin v Chris Van Heerden

Post by ScottDetonator »

I'd favour Gavin over Heerden, only looks like a 10 rounder as well. A better level of opposition than I thought it'd be. Must win for Frankie.

I'd expect Macklin to have a really easy contest on the undercard.
whiskey
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11956
Joined: 27 Mar 2007, 14:52

Re: Frankie Gavin v Chris Van Heerden

Post by whiskey »

10 rounder ?

Not sure that works in Frankie's favour to be honest.
ste1983
Middleweight
Posts: 1759
Joined: 01 Oct 2013, 10:30

Re: Frankie Gavin v Chris Van Heerden

Post by ste1983 »

10 rounder headlining an arena show
pyenest77
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1491
Joined: 29 Sep 2009, 15:14

Re: Frankie Gavin v Chris Van Heerden

Post by pyenest77 »

Unconvinced about Van Heerden although I havent seen Frankie matching the hype he had as an amateur yet?
handsofstone
Cruiserweight
Posts: 22989
Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 17:28

Re: Frankie Gavin v Chris Van Heerden

Post by handsofstone »

I thought Gavin edged Bundu by a round but he lost and Frankie hasn't beat anyone to deserve a big fight,don't get me wrong I'd rather see him in with a recent former world champ,just to get a look how Gavin deals with him but Van Heerden's a decent test
pyenest77
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1491
Joined: 29 Sep 2009, 15:14

Re: Frankie Gavin v Chris Van Heerden

Post by pyenest77 »

They will sell it on the fact he was a world champion but in fairness he was on WBU or such like hardly meeting elite boxers.
ashedward
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 420
Joined: 19 Apr 2009, 16:17

Re: Frankie Gavin v Chris Van Heerden

Post by ashedward »

It's an alright fight, without it being something to get overly excited about. I don't rate Gavin much as a pro do I wouldn't be surprised if van heeden joined Heiland and Zlatican as fighters who have beaten Matchroom guys on a Matchroom show
Happy Slapper
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 499
Joined: 20 Jul 2008, 16:22

Re: Frankie Gavin v Chris Van Heerden

Post by Happy Slapper »

Gavin should be at 10st. Everyone can see it. He's fleshy and has no muscle definition at all.

Also, he's just exceptionally boring to watch - never engages really and lacks pop. There is no way they can build a fight with Brook from Gavin - it's a total mismatch.
Rexob
Middleweight
Posts: 6025
Joined: 20 Mar 2014, 15:17

Re: Frankie Gavin v Chris Van Heerden

Post by Rexob »

What's the betting it kicks off in Brum?
freddydoesdallas
Cruiserweight
Posts: 9436
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 13:48

Re: Frankie Gavin v Chris Van Heerden

Post by freddydoesdallas »

Rexob wrote:What's the betting it kicks off in Brum?
Definietly more action outside than inside the ring
magnus
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1164
Joined: 13 Dec 2004, 08:59

Re: Frankie Gavin v Chris Van Heerden

Post by magnus »

I suspect I'd struggle to be overly enthusiastic about any fight involving Frankie Gavin, but all things considered this seems a fairly well-matched fight, based on Gavin falling short at Euro level.

I don't know why people are underwhelmed, who were you realistically expecting? Bradley? JMM?
rd350lc
Super Welterweight
Posts: 4900
Joined: 22 Nov 2014, 11:49

Re: Frankie Gavin v Chris Van Heerden

Post by rd350lc »

Happy Slapper wrote:Gavin should be at 10st. Everyone can see it. He's fleshy and has no muscle definition at all.

Also, he's just exceptionally boring to watch - never engages really and lacks pop. There is no way they can build a fight with Brook from Gavin - it's a total mismatch.
agree with what you are saying but Vassel had a terrific physique at the weight and look what happened there .
freddydoesdallas
Cruiserweight
Posts: 9436
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 13:48

Re: Frankie Gavin v Chris Van Heerden

Post by freddydoesdallas »

magnus wrote:I suspect I'd struggle to be overly enthusiastic about any fight involving Frankie Gavin, but all things considered this seems a fairly well-matched fight, based on Gavin falling short at Euro level.

I don't know why people are underwhelmed, who were you realistically expecting? Bradley? JMM?
think it's all to do with the usual shite from hearn et al on twitter:

'Big fight made for Birmingham trust me you won't be disappointed'

And it's a fella who's best win is Matthew hatton years back
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: Frankie Gavin v Chris Van Heerden

Post by crusader »

magnus wrote:I suspect I'd struggle to be overly enthusiastic about any fight involving Frankie Gavin, but all things considered this seems a fairly well-matched fight, based on Gavin falling short at Euro level.

I don't know why people are underwhelmed, who were you realistically expecting? Bradley? JMM?
My sentiments too.
magnus
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1164
Joined: 13 Dec 2004, 08:59

Re: Frankie Gavin v Chris Van Heerden

Post by magnus »

[[/quote]

think it's all to do with the usual shite from hearn et al on twitter:

'Big fight made for Birmingham trust me you won't be disappointed'

And it's a fella who's best win is Matthew hatton years back[/quote]

Mate, I do get that frustration, but all promoters hype their bills/fighters beyond belief. It's the nature of their role. Look at any press release for a Dennis Hobson show, or any thing that Mick Hennessey ever says. Eddie Hearn did not invent bullshit, although he is using a lot of it and on different platforms. It's not worth getting annoyed about, I just don't listen and judge the fights that are made on their own merits, otherwise I'd have stopped following the sport 20 years ago.

As I've said, it's a decent enough match-up, nothing more, nothing less, and seems a sensible match-up for Frankie Gavin at this point in his career.
magnus
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1164
Joined: 13 Dec 2004, 08:59

Re: Frankie Gavin v Chris Van Heerden

Post by magnus »

Actually Matchroom can have that quote for the posters - "a sensible match-up". That should help shift a few thousand. :TU:
Post Reply