Montreal Card

Post Reply
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Montreal Card

Post by crusader »

Doesn't seem to be much action in the RBR section anymore so I'll post this here.

Chilemba boxing well through two.
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: Montreal Card

Post by crusader »

3-0 Chilemba

He's befuddling Lep with a mix of busy hands and lateral movement. VL coming forward but not throwing much and when he does Chilemba is either out of range or bends low and avoid most of VL's shots.
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: Montreal Card

Post by crusader »

More of the same in the fourth, with Chilemba adding some effective inside work and getting Lep's attention with an uppercut. This is the best I recall Chilemba looking.

4-0
hurricanemitch14
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 828
Joined: 13 Apr 2004, 02:35

Re: Montreal Card

Post by hurricanemitch14 »

Lep looks like hes half asleep in there.
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: Montreal Card

Post by crusader »

hurricanemitch14 wrote:Lep looks like hes half asleep in there.
Yes, very lackluster performance.

5-0 for Chilemba, who is outclassing Lep.
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: Montreal Card

Post by crusader »

Chilemba landing several good shots in the sixth, though he hasn't been able to visibly hurt Lep.
reggaereggae
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4723
Joined: 21 Dec 2009, 17:01

Re: Montreal Card

Post by reggaereggae »

can anyone PM me a stream
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: Montreal Card

Post by crusader »

Now Lep backs to the ropes and looks to be trying to draw Chilemba in, although he hardly throws back when Chilemba obliges and puts together several combinations. Lep looking clueless and surprisingly out of his depth.

7-0
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: Montreal Card

Post by crusader »

More of the same in the 8th. Lep is being made to look like a beginner who is sparring with a much more seasoned boxer.
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: Montreal Card

Post by crusader »

Chilemba more aggressive in the ninth, seeming to sense that he can largely do as he pleases. He unloads a bunch of combos on Lep while the latter is against the ropes and hardly throwing back. Lep looking tired and resigned to losing.
Last edited by crusader on 14 Mar 2015, 22:41, edited 1 time in total.
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: Montreal Card

Post by crusader »

10-0 Chilemba on my card and 99-91 x2/100-90 on the official cards.

I thought that he'd win but not this lopsidedly. I think this puts him in a position of being a defensible but uninspiring title challenger, though I'd prefer to see him fight someone like Alvarez or Beterbiev next.
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: Montreal Card

Post by crusader »

Glazkov-Cunningham next, which I think will be a more entertaining and competitive fight.
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: Montreal Card

Post by crusader »

Tony Bellew saying that he thinks USS will be vulnerable early while Glazkov will be vulnerable late.
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: Montreal Card

Post by crusader »

Both fighters in the ring.
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: Montreal Card

Post by crusader »

An uneventful first round. Glazkov moving forward while Cunningham circling. Each falling short with many of their punches and nothing of note landing.

10-10
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: Montreal Card

Post by crusader »

Cunningham picks up his activity and puts together some decent combinations. Glazkov's pace seems largely the same and he's not landing as much or getting off as quickly. Still a competitive round but Cunningham takes it on my card

1-0-1 USS
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: Montreal Card

Post by crusader »

Much of the same in the third.

2-0-1 USS
Evander
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13979
Joined: 07 May 2005, 16:49

Re: Montreal Card

Post by Evander »

Glazkov looks like an easy target to hit as he comes in with his hands quite low, Cunningham isn't taking advantage of it.
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: Montreal Card

Post by crusader »

RJJ and Pascal shown grooving in their locker room.
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: Montreal Card

Post by crusader »

Glazkov following USS around and waiting too long to throw. USS is fighting with more energy and getting some quick combos off which are connecting. Glazkov having some moments each round but clearly doing less than USS in my opinion.

3-0-1
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: Montreal Card

Post by crusader »

This is redolent of Glazkov-Scott.
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: Montreal Card

Post by crusader »

The fifth is a clear round for USS, who is doing some of his best work to the body.

4-0-1
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: Montreal Card

Post by crusader »

More inside fighting in the sixth compared to the previous rounds. Glazkov seems sluggish and to me it looked like USS outhustled him to win yet another round.

Paul Smith, who is commentating for British TV, has it 59-56 USS.
skanksta
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16791
Joined: 17 Oct 2008, 10:25

Re: Montreal Card

Post by skanksta »

comms gave the fifth to VG.
Have you fallen asleep ?
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: Montreal Card

Post by crusader »

So what if they did? I thought USS won it.
Post Reply