Sky win Mayweather vs Pacquiao
Sky win Mayweather vs Pacquiao
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/boxing ... fight.html
Jeff Powell is reporting that a 'revenue split' in addition to money up front has secured Sky the rights to the event.
Jeff Powell is reporting that a 'revenue split' in addition to money up front has secured Sky the rights to the event.
Re: Sky win Mayweather vs Pacquiao
Frank must be gutted, this fight would have done wonders for allegedly subscriber count.
How many PPV buys do we think Sky will achieve? There is a lot of hype for this fight now which will only increase as the event draws closer. Still, i cant get away from the fact many non boxing fans in the UK dont know who Mayweather or Pacquiao are or are only just learning something about them now.
Will this event break the UK record for PPV buys? It is probably going to be priced at an all time high, possibly around £25. Will that turn subscribers away or will it help to flame the fire and highten peoples desire to see this fight?
How many PPV buys do we think Sky will achieve? There is a lot of hype for this fight now which will only increase as the event draws closer. Still, i cant get away from the fact many non boxing fans in the UK dont know who Mayweather or Pacquiao are or are only just learning something about them now.
Will this event break the UK record for PPV buys? It is probably going to be priced at an all time high, possibly around £25. Will that turn subscribers away or will it help to flame the fire and highten peoples desire to see this fight?
Re: Sky win Mayweather vs Pacquiao
I'll wait until someone who knows what they're on about confirms it, Powell just makes shit up to fill articles.
-
MarkMcBurney
- Super Middleweight
- Posts: 1670
- Joined: 18 Nov 2012, 07:47
Re: Sky win Mayweather vs Pacquiao
^ This. He said this week that Messi wasn't in the top 5 players of all time...
Re: Sky win Mayweather vs Pacquiao
For the money they were looking for I don't think he'll be gutted at all. Far too expensive a fight for niche channel to buy. It's like Motors TV bidding for an F1 race.ALI wrote:Frank must be gutted, this fight would have done wonders for allegedly subscriber count.
Re: Sky win Mayweather vs Pacquiao
Yeah, its one thing to pay a one-off PPV fee, but another thing if you have to first subscribe to a channel.
I am still not sure how much this fight will appeal to the average sports fan, being on in the early hours of the morning won't help, and the more obstacles in the way will also affect sales.
For me (and I assume most casuals) after doing a quick Google search and reading about problems of minimum number of months sign up, problems in cancelling direct debits etc. I just wouldn't be bothered.
I am still not sure how much this fight will appeal to the average sports fan, being on in the early hours of the morning won't help, and the more obstacles in the way will also affect sales.
For me (and I assume most casuals) after doing a quick Google search and reading about problems of minimum number of months sign up, problems in cancelling direct debits etc. I just wouldn't be bothered.
Re: Sky win Mayweather vs Pacquiao
It was only ever going to be Sky in my opinion. Not having sky means I won't get it rammed down my throat every 2 minutes but it will be interesting to see how it pans out. However, having said that, Sky obviously do their research and wouldn't be entertaining this unless they were certain it will profit them. Once again, as we know, the general public will fall for the hype despite not knowing who either boxer is. Fight of the millenium will sell itself.
It would have been interesting to see what impact it would have really made to allegedly to get this fight. It's not the end of the world for them as I'm sure if they can get Fury v Wlad in the summer of Autumn that will do as well for them as Haye Chisora did especially if Fury really goes for it in the build up.
It would have been interesting to see what impact it would have really made to allegedly to get this fight. It's not the end of the world for them as I'm sure if they can get Fury v Wlad in the summer of Autumn that will do as well for them as Haye Chisora did especially if Fury really goes for it in the build up.
-
Old bones Ian
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 11811
- Joined: 13 Jul 2004, 07:33
Re: Sky win Mayweather vs Pacquiao
i think Sky will go for £50 PPV
Re: Sky win Mayweather vs Pacquiao
If it's £50 I'll not bother, they already get £80 or more a month out of me. I'll go to £25/30 but will have to wait until the next week to watch if they try for 50 quid, it's not worth the risk of it being shite.
Re: Sky win Mayweather vs Pacquiao
"Sky will certainly need to break the pay-per-view record of 1.2m viewers here for Ricky Hatton’s crushing defeat by Mayweather in 2007. Those numbers suggest that Sky will have guaranteed in excess of £10m."
Last edited by PokerRob on 21 Mar 2015, 15:11, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Sky win Mayweather vs Pacquiao
Hatton v Mayweather doing 1.2 million buys is very impressive indeed, thats 11% of all subscribers buying the event (11 million UK homes have Sky).
Will 11 homes out of 100 buy Mayweather vs Pacquiao? I cant see it, its two non Brits fighting at 5 am in the morning and by all accounts its going to be priced at a premium.
Will 11 homes out of 100 buy Mayweather vs Pacquiao? I cant see it, its two non Brits fighting at 5 am in the morning and by all accounts its going to be priced at a premium.
-
jamesmcdonnell
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 45238
- Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11
Re: Sky win Mayweather vs Pacquiao
Me either, this is really still one for hardcore boxing, and hardcore sports fans - a lot of people will be interested in the result, but not prepared to pay or wait until 5.00 a.m to watch it.ALI wrote:Hatton v Mayweather doing 1.2 million buys is very impressive indeed, thats 11% of all subscribers buying the event (11 million UK homes have Sky).
Will 11 homes out of 100 buy Mayweather vs Pacquiao? I cant see it, its two non Brits fighting at 5 am in the morning and by all accounts its going to be priced at a premium.
I think this will do well to hit 1 million buys. Hatton was a PPV machine - he had an incredible mainstream following for a modern british fighter, one of boxing's few crossover stars of recent years.
-
jamesmcdonnell
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 45238
- Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11
Re: Sky win Mayweather vs Pacquiao
Old bones Ian wrote:i think Sky will go for £50 PPV
No way, they would lose far too many people - it would be commercial suicide.
-
jamesmcdonnell
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 45238
- Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11
Re: Sky win Mayweather vs Pacquiao
They wouldn't be the first to miscacluate - however, they have deep pockets, and can afford to not make money on this.dbf wrote:It was only ever going to be Sky in my opinion. Not having sky means I won't get it rammed down my throat every 2 minutes but it will be interesting to see how it pans out. However, having said that, Sky obviously do their research and wouldn't be entertaining this unless they were certain it will profit them. Once again, as we know, the general public will fall for the hype despite not knowing who either boxer is. Fight of the millenium will sell itself.
It would have been interesting to see what impact it would have really made to allegedly to get this fight. It's not the end of the world for them as I'm sure if they can get Fury v Wlad in the summer of Autumn that will do as well for them as Haye Chisora did especially if Fury really goes for it in the build up.
As big as this fight is in boxing terms, it's not a guaranteed smash at the box office in the UK, by any stretch.
-
Bard of Boxrec
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 13114
- Joined: 22 Feb 2002, 20:00
Re: Sky win Mayweather vs Pacquiao
I'll be watching in the casino, seems to be the only option
Re: Sky win Mayweather vs Pacquiao
Sounds good, hope you're luckyRiddick Blowe wrote:I'll be watching in the casino, seems to be the only option
-
thatllbeme
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 359
- Joined: 18 Jun 2012, 16:55
Re: Sky win Mayweather vs Pacquiao
there will be a lot of poker nights and late night gathering round friends houses for this one I think
-
Manchester Hitman
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 1263
- Joined: 23 Aug 2012, 15:56
Re: Sky win Mayweather vs Pacquiao
Looks like sky haven't bothered trying to get Hearn to scrap up a uk leg plus theres nothing decent on the undercard so I will out clubbing with the lads and we'll crawl back to mine for about 3:30 to carry on the party until the ringwalks
Re: Sky win Mayweather vs Pacquiao
Imagine paying 50 quid to watch adverts in-between rounds.
-
jamesmcdonnell
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 45238
- Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11
Re: Sky win Mayweather vs Pacquiao
Yeah, insult upon injury, I would not pay 50 quid if Mayweather's missus came and fellated me between round.mrbishi wrote:Imagine paying 50 quid to watch adverts in-between rounds.
Re: Sky win Mayweather vs Pacquiao
as a allegedly subscriber on talk talk im a bit unhappy i cant get it at home but really, pacman and mayweather are just trying to cash in at the last possible moment after taking fight fans for fools for years. im genuinely more excited by the matthyse v provodninkov fight
Re: Sky win Mayweather vs Pacquiao
Its a very cynical and stale fight at this point in their respective careers.veriton wrote:as a allegedly subscriber on talk talk im a bit unhappy i cant get it at home but really, pacman and mayweather are just trying to cash in at the last possible moment after taking fight fans for fools for years. im genuinely more excited by the matthyse v provodninkov fight
I think it's been overvalued myself, and would bet on it not being the roaring success in the UK that people think it will be, for 2 non-Brits fighting at 4.30am GMT.
I forecast a lot will go hunting for an American version on the Sunday AM to watch whilst eating their bacon & eggs.
Hell I'm tired at 10pm on Saturday's now, let alone the thought of shelling out £25+ for Watt & Halling at 4am.
Although the thought of finally seeing that first bell go and them both being in the ring together at long long last will likely get the better of me on the night. But right now I'm not assed.
Re: Sky win Mayweather vs Pacquiao
Same here providing disaster IE early KO cut etcveriton wrote:as a allegedly subscriber on talk talk im a bit unhappy i cant get it at home but really, pacman and mayweather are just trying to cash in at the last possible moment after taking fight fans for fools for years. im genuinely more excited by the matthyse v provodninkov fight
Re: Sky win Mayweather vs Pacquiao
i watch all boxing nation on my laptop link to my computer, just because its pain, boxing nation you have to ring up and get it on one box. i have sky, if drinking i will stay up and watch fights, if not sky plus. i would pay£20 for pac man no more . HBO build up is fantastic which is free on you tube, if they take the Michael and charge £50 then there on par with wwe
-
reggaereggae
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 4723
- Joined: 21 Dec 2009, 17:01
Re: Sky win Mayweather vs Pacquiao
You'd let Justin Bieber give you a blow job?!?jamesmcdonnell wrote:Yeah, insult upon injury, I would not pay 50 quid if Mayweather's missus came and fellated me between round.mrbishi wrote:Imagine paying 50 quid to watch adverts in-between rounds.