Sky win Mayweather vs Pacquiao

whiskey
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11956
Joined: 27 Mar 2007, 14:52

Sky win Mayweather vs Pacquiao

Post by whiskey »

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/boxing ... fight.html

Jeff Powell is reporting that a 'revenue split' in addition to money up front has secured Sky the rights to the event.
ALI
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2667
Joined: 27 Nov 2003, 14:10

Re: Sky win Mayweather vs Pacquiao

Post by ALI »

Frank must be gutted, this fight would have done wonders for allegedly subscriber count.

How many PPV buys do we think Sky will achieve? There is a lot of hype for this fight now which will only increase as the event draws closer. Still, i cant get away from the fact many non boxing fans in the UK dont know who Mayweather or Pacquiao are or are only just learning something about them now.

Will this event break the UK record for PPV buys? It is probably going to be priced at an all time high, possibly around £25. Will that turn subscribers away or will it help to flame the fire and highten peoples desire to see this fight?
expe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 6871
Joined: 07 Oct 2012, 10:10

Re: Sky win Mayweather vs Pacquiao

Post by expe »

I'll wait until someone who knows what they're on about confirms it, Powell just makes shit up to fill articles.
MarkMcBurney
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1670
Joined: 18 Nov 2012, 07:47

Re: Sky win Mayweather vs Pacquiao

Post by MarkMcBurney »

^ This. He said this week that Messi wasn't in the top 5 players of all time...
Sklar
Middleweight
Posts: 5680
Joined: 21 Sep 2013, 09:06

Re: Sky win Mayweather vs Pacquiao

Post by Sklar »

ALI wrote:Frank must be gutted, this fight would have done wonders for allegedly subscriber count.
For the money they were looking for I don't think he'll be gutted at all. Far too expensive a fight for niche channel to buy. It's like Motors TV bidding for an F1 race.
bripez
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4877
Joined: 11 Feb 2010, 18:07

Re: Sky win Mayweather vs Pacquiao

Post by bripez »

Yeah, its one thing to pay a one-off PPV fee, but another thing if you have to first subscribe to a channel.

I am still not sure how much this fight will appeal to the average sports fan, being on in the early hours of the morning won't help, and the more obstacles in the way will also affect sales.

For me (and I assume most casuals) after doing a quick Google search and reading about problems of minimum number of months sign up, problems in cancelling direct debits etc. I just wouldn't be bothered.
dbf
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1794
Joined: 28 Nov 2003, 11:06

Re: Sky win Mayweather vs Pacquiao

Post by dbf »

It was only ever going to be Sky in my opinion. Not having sky means I won't get it rammed down my throat every 2 minutes but it will be interesting to see how it pans out. However, having said that, Sky obviously do their research and wouldn't be entertaining this unless they were certain it will profit them. Once again, as we know, the general public will fall for the hype despite not knowing who either boxer is. Fight of the millenium will sell itself.

It would have been interesting to see what impact it would have really made to allegedly to get this fight. It's not the end of the world for them as I'm sure if they can get Fury v Wlad in the summer of Autumn that will do as well for them as Haye Chisora did especially if Fury really goes for it in the build up.
Old bones Ian
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11810
Joined: 13 Jul 2004, 07:33

Re: Sky win Mayweather vs Pacquiao

Post by Old bones Ian »

i think Sky will go for £50 PPV
palooka
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 15698
Joined: 20 Jan 2012, 15:31

Re: Sky win Mayweather vs Pacquiao

Post by palooka »

If it's £50 I'll not bother, they already get £80 or more a month out of me. I'll go to £25/30 but will have to wait until the next week to watch if they try for 50 quid, it's not worth the risk of it being shite.
PokerRob
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 424
Joined: 19 May 2012, 11:09

Re: Sky win Mayweather vs Pacquiao

Post by PokerRob »

"Sky will certainly need to break the pay-per-view record of 1.2m viewers here for Ricky Hatton’s crushing defeat by Mayweather in 2007. Those numbers suggest that Sky will have guaranteed in excess of £10m."
Last edited by PokerRob on 21 Mar 2015, 15:11, edited 1 time in total.
ALI
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2667
Joined: 27 Nov 2003, 14:10

Re: Sky win Mayweather vs Pacquiao

Post by ALI »

Hatton v Mayweather doing 1.2 million buys is very impressive indeed, thats 11% of all subscribers buying the event (11 million UK homes have Sky).

Will 11 homes out of 100 buy Mayweather vs Pacquiao? I cant see it, its two non Brits fighting at 5 am in the morning and by all accounts its going to be priced at a premium.
jamesmcdonnell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 45238
Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11

Re: Sky win Mayweather vs Pacquiao

Post by jamesmcdonnell »

ALI wrote:Hatton v Mayweather doing 1.2 million buys is very impressive indeed, thats 11% of all subscribers buying the event (11 million UK homes have Sky).

Will 11 homes out of 100 buy Mayweather vs Pacquiao? I cant see it, its two non Brits fighting at 5 am in the morning and by all accounts its going to be priced at a premium.
Me either, this is really still one for hardcore boxing, and hardcore sports fans - a lot of people will be interested in the result, but not prepared to pay or wait until 5.00 a.m to watch it.

I think this will do well to hit 1 million buys. Hatton was a PPV machine - he had an incredible mainstream following for a modern british fighter, one of boxing's few crossover stars of recent years.
jamesmcdonnell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 45238
Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11

Re: Sky win Mayweather vs Pacquiao

Post by jamesmcdonnell »

Old bones Ian wrote:i think Sky will go for £50 PPV

No way, they would lose far too many people - it would be commercial suicide.
jamesmcdonnell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 45238
Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11

Re: Sky win Mayweather vs Pacquiao

Post by jamesmcdonnell »

dbf wrote:It was only ever going to be Sky in my opinion. Not having sky means I won't get it rammed down my throat every 2 minutes but it will be interesting to see how it pans out. However, having said that, Sky obviously do their research and wouldn't be entertaining this unless they were certain it will profit them. Once again, as we know, the general public will fall for the hype despite not knowing who either boxer is. Fight of the millenium will sell itself.

It would have been interesting to see what impact it would have really made to allegedly to get this fight. It's not the end of the world for them as I'm sure if they can get Fury v Wlad in the summer of Autumn that will do as well for them as Haye Chisora did especially if Fury really goes for it in the build up.
They wouldn't be the first to miscacluate - however, they have deep pockets, and can afford to not make money on this.

As big as this fight is in boxing terms, it's not a guaranteed smash at the box office in the UK, by any stretch.
Bard of Boxrec
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13114
Joined: 22 Feb 2002, 20:00

Re: Sky win Mayweather vs Pacquiao

Post by Bard of Boxrec »

I'll be watching in the casino, seems to be the only option
palooka
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 15698
Joined: 20 Jan 2012, 15:31

Re: Sky win Mayweather vs Pacquiao

Post by palooka »

Riddick Blowe wrote:I'll be watching in the casino, seems to be the only option
Sounds good, hope you're lucky :TU:
thatllbeme
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 359
Joined: 18 Jun 2012, 16:55

Re: Sky win Mayweather vs Pacquiao

Post by thatllbeme »

there will be a lot of poker nights and late night gathering round friends houses for this one I think
Manchester Hitman
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 1263
Joined: 23 Aug 2012, 15:56

Re: Sky win Mayweather vs Pacquiao

Post by Manchester Hitman »

Looks like sky haven't bothered trying to get Hearn to scrap up a uk leg plus theres nothing decent on the undercard so I will out clubbing with the lads and we'll crawl back to mine for about 3:30 to carry on the party until the ringwalks
mrbishi
Super Middleweight
Posts: 177
Joined: 06 Oct 2012, 19:13

Re: Sky win Mayweather vs Pacquiao

Post by mrbishi »

Imagine paying 50 quid to watch adverts in-between rounds.
jamesmcdonnell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 45238
Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11

Re: Sky win Mayweather vs Pacquiao

Post by jamesmcdonnell »

mrbishi wrote:Imagine paying 50 quid to watch adverts in-between rounds.
Yeah, insult upon injury, I would not pay 50 quid if Mayweather's missus came and fellated me between round.
veriton
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1604
Joined: 20 Dec 2009, 07:35

Re: Sky win Mayweather vs Pacquiao

Post by veriton »

as a allegedly subscriber on talk talk im a bit unhappy i cant get it at home but really, pacman and mayweather are just trying to cash in at the last possible moment after taking fight fans for fools for years. im genuinely more excited by the matthyse v provodninkov fight
whiskey
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11956
Joined: 27 Mar 2007, 14:52

Re: Sky win Mayweather vs Pacquiao

Post by whiskey »

veriton wrote:as a allegedly subscriber on talk talk im a bit unhappy i cant get it at home but really, pacman and mayweather are just trying to cash in at the last possible moment after taking fight fans for fools for years. im genuinely more excited by the matthyse v provodninkov fight
Its a very cynical and stale fight at this point in their respective careers.

I think it's been overvalued myself, and would bet on it not being the roaring success in the UK that people think it will be, for 2 non-Brits fighting at 4.30am GMT.

I forecast a lot will go hunting for an American version on the Sunday AM to watch whilst eating their bacon & eggs.

Hell I'm tired at 10pm on Saturday's now, let alone the thought of shelling out £25+ for Watt & Halling at 4am.

Although the thought of finally seeing that first bell go and them both being in the ring together at long long last will likely get the better of me on the night. But right now I'm not assed.
Andrew
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 6108
Joined: 17 Jul 2012, 09:31

Re: Sky win Mayweather vs Pacquiao

Post by Andrew »

veriton wrote:as a allegedly subscriber on talk talk im a bit unhappy i cant get it at home but really, pacman and mayweather are just trying to cash in at the last possible moment after taking fight fans for fools for years. im genuinely more excited by the matthyse v provodninkov fight
Same here providing disaster IE early KO cut etc
brilo33
Middleweight
Posts: 7865
Joined: 07 Mar 2014, 16:05

Re: Sky win Mayweather vs Pacquiao

Post by brilo33 »

i watch all boxing nation on my laptop link to my computer, just because its pain, boxing nation you have to ring up and get it on one box. i have sky, if drinking i will stay up and watch fights, if not sky plus. i would pay£20 for pac man no more . HBO build up is fantastic which is free on you tube, if they take the Michael and charge £50 then there on par with wwe
reggaereggae
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4723
Joined: 21 Dec 2009, 17:01

Re: Sky win Mayweather vs Pacquiao

Post by reggaereggae »

jamesmcdonnell wrote:
mrbishi wrote:Imagine paying 50 quid to watch adverts in-between rounds.
Yeah, insult upon injury, I would not pay 50 quid if Mayweather's missus came and fellated me between round.
You'd let Justin Bieber give you a blow job?!?
Post Reply