The official Brook v Dan fight night discussion thread
Re: The official Brook v Dan fight night discussion thread
love the commentary, he is a bum don't know how he got the fight, BUT lets give him the benefit of the doubt
-
jameswilson
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 13497
- Joined: 08 Jan 2004, 18:01
Re: The official Brook v Dan fight night discussion thread
Who else thought the ref was gonna start belting out 'nessum dorma' when he bowed there?
Re: The official Brook v Dan fight night discussion thread
15 months out is a long time at this level.
Re: The official Brook v Dan fight night discussion thread
never took to the mcdonnell fighters, when i think jamie said he is not a boxing fan
-
jameswilson
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 13497
- Joined: 08 Jan 2004, 18:01
Re: The official Brook v Dan fight night discussion thread
I'm aghast the EBU had him so high in their rankings.Neil Gee wrote:15 months out is a long time at this level.
Re: The official Brook v Dan fight night discussion thread
First glance, looks like a typical Matchroom match up
-
Boxerbeetle
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 32993
- Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59
Re: The official Brook v Dan fight night discussion thread
Didn't an interviewer once have to explain to him who Roberto Duran was?brilo33 wrote:never took to the mcdonnell fighters, when i think jamie said he is not a boxing fan
-
jameswilson
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 13497
- Joined: 08 Jan 2004, 18:01
Re: The official Brook v Dan fight night discussion thread
What by winning the first round?rossij8 wrote:First glance, looks like a typical Matchroom opponent
Re: The official Brook v Dan fight night discussion thread
I had a feeling Yegorov could be a dark horse, he is from Ukraine after all not Serbia. If he can overcome size difference he can cause an upset.
Re: The official Brook v Dan fight night discussion thread
Better than expected.
Re: The official Brook v Dan fight night discussion thread
Anyone who can hook me up plz 
Re: The official Brook v Dan fight night discussion thread
-
Counter-puncher
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 39141
- Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41
Re: The official Brook v Dan fight night discussion thread
i found it quite refreshing. Its his job, some boxers (or say footballers like David Batty famously) treat it as nothing more. As long as they approach it professionally what's the problem? God us boxing geeks can be demandingBoxerbeetle wrote:Didn't an interviewer once have to explain to him who Roberto Duran was?brilo33 wrote:never took to the mcdonnell fighters, when i think jamie said he is not a boxing fan
the fvckers are slogging.their guts out and they are, what, supposed.to spend their spare time gaying out over Willie pep clips on youtube?
id much prefer that than boxers pretending they love the sport when its clearly nothing more than their own vehicle for fame and nothing more
Re: The official Brook v Dan fight night discussion thread
It has, hasn't it?Glass Joe wrote:![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
hope this card picks up
-
jameswilson
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 13497
- Joined: 08 Jan 2004, 18:01
Re: The official Brook v Dan fight night discussion thread
Amir Khan's boxing knowledge is shocking too.
Re: The official Brook v Dan fight night discussion thread
I still expect McDonnell to get the stoppage around six
Re: The official Brook v Dan fight night discussion thread
Padded record on paper but yegrov is giving it a good go.
I think inactivity will impact him later.
I think inactivity will impact him later.
Last edited by Andrew on 28 Mar 2015, 16:57, edited 1 time in total.
-
Counter-puncher
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 39141
- Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41
Re: The official Brook v Dan fight night discussion thread
jameswilson wrote:Amir Khan's boxing knowledge is shocking too.
to be fair i doubt there is a subject on earth on which khan could express himself with the eloquence of a particularly bright 12 year old
Re: The official Brook v Dan fight night discussion thread
48-47 McDonnell
-
Boxerbeetle
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 32993
- Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59
Re: The official Brook v Dan fight night discussion thread
I know what you mean, and I don't expect boxers to have an encyclopedic knowledge of the sport. Just thought it was odd not to have even heard of a very famous predecessor. McDonnell would certainly not be welcome on my pub quiz teamCounter-puncher wrote:i found it quite refreshing. Its his job, some boxers (or say footballers like David Batty famously) treat it as nothing more. As long as they approach it professionally what's the problem? God us boxing geeks can be demandingBoxerbeetle wrote:Didn't an interviewer once have to explain to him who Roberto Duran was?brilo33 wrote:never took to the mcdonnell fighters, when i think jamie said he is not a boxing fan
the fvckers are slogging.their guts out and they are, what, supposed.to spend their spare time gaying out over Willie pep clips on youtube?
id much prefer that than boxers pretending they love the sport when its clearly nothing more than their own vehicle for fame and nothing more
Re: The official Brook v Dan fight night discussion thread
true enough , but as a boxing fan feel i have nothing in common with him , we know when we think about it they are all prize fighters. but we ignored that, and we feel they are fighting for their blood, country, people. tell me when you see morales v pacquiao you diddnt think what pride these men haveCounter-puncher wrote:i found it quite refreshing. Its his job, some boxers (or say footballers like David Batty famously) treat it as nothing more. As long as they approach it professionally what's the problem? God us boxing geeks can be demandingBoxerbeetle wrote:Didn't an interviewer once have to explain to him who Roberto Duran was?brilo33 wrote:never took to the mcdonnell fighters, when i think jamie said he is not a boxing fan
the fvckers are slogging.their guts out and they are, what, supposed.to spend their spare time gaying out over Willie pep clips on youtube?
id much prefer that than boxers pretending they love the sport when its clearly nothing more than their own vehicle for fame and nothing more