The official Brook v Dan fight night discussion thread

brilo33
Middleweight
Posts: 7865
Joined: 07 Mar 2014, 16:05

Re: The official Brook v Dan fight night discussion thread

Post by brilo33 »

love the commentary, he is a bum don't know how he got the fight, BUT lets give him the benefit of the doubt
jameswilson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13497
Joined: 08 Jan 2004, 18:01

Re: The official Brook v Dan fight night discussion thread

Post by jameswilson »

Who else thought the ref was gonna start belting out 'nessum dorma' when he bowed there?
Neil Gee
Super Middleweight
Posts: 4257
Joined: 06 Jul 2013, 15:37

Re: The official Brook v Dan fight night discussion thread

Post by Neil Gee »

15 months out is a long time at this level.
brilo33
Middleweight
Posts: 7865
Joined: 07 Mar 2014, 16:05

Re: The official Brook v Dan fight night discussion thread

Post by brilo33 »

never took to the mcdonnell fighters, when i think jamie said he is not a boxing fan
jameswilson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13497
Joined: 08 Jan 2004, 18:01

Re: The official Brook v Dan fight night discussion thread

Post by jameswilson »

Neil Gee wrote:15 months out is a long time at this level.
I'm aghast the EBU had him so high in their rankings.
rossij8
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 1746
Joined: 16 Jul 2012, 08:06

Re: The official Brook v Dan fight night discussion thread

Post by rossij8 »

First glance, looks like a typical Matchroom match up
Boxerbeetle
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 32993
Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59

Re: The official Brook v Dan fight night discussion thread

Post by Boxerbeetle »

brilo33 wrote:never took to the mcdonnell fighters, when i think jamie said he is not a boxing fan
Didn't an interviewer once have to explain to him who Roberto Duran was?
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22335
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: The official Brook v Dan fight night discussion thread

Post by Horse »

10-9 Yegorov
jameswilson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13497
Joined: 08 Jan 2004, 18:01

Re: The official Brook v Dan fight night discussion thread

Post by jameswilson »

rossij8 wrote:First glance, looks like a typical Matchroom opponent
What by winning the first round?
Tarkus
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2859
Joined: 04 Jul 2010, 08:50

Re: The official Brook v Dan fight night discussion thread

Post by Tarkus »

I had a feeling Yegorov could be a dark horse, he is from Ukraine after all not Serbia. If he can overcome size difference he can cause an upset.
Neil Gee
Super Middleweight
Posts: 4257
Joined: 06 Jul 2013, 15:37

Re: The official Brook v Dan fight night discussion thread

Post by Neil Gee »

Better than expected.
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22335
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: The official Brook v Dan fight night discussion thread

Post by Horse »

19-19 Even
Fatsam
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 454
Joined: 13 Jun 2008, 11:14

Re: The official Brook v Dan fight night discussion thread

Post by Fatsam »

Anyone who can hook me up plz :TU:
Glass Joe
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 5026
Joined: 08 Feb 2012, 10:29

Re: The official Brook v Dan fight night discussion thread

Post by Glass Joe »

:zzz: :zzz: :zzz: :zzz: :zzz: hope this card picks up
Counter-puncher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 39141
Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41

Re: The official Brook v Dan fight night discussion thread

Post by Counter-puncher »

Boxerbeetle wrote:
brilo33 wrote:never took to the mcdonnell fighters, when i think jamie said he is not a boxing fan
Didn't an interviewer once have to explain to him who Roberto Duran was?
i found it quite refreshing. Its his job, some boxers (or say footballers like David Batty famously) treat it as nothing more. As long as they approach it professionally what's the problem? God us boxing geeks can be demanding
the fvckers are slogging.their guts out and they are, what, supposed.to spend their spare time gaying out over Willie pep clips on youtube?

id much prefer that than boxers pretending they love the sport when its clearly nothing more than their own vehicle for fame and nothing more
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22335
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: The official Brook v Dan fight night discussion thread

Post by Horse »

Glass Joe wrote: :zzz: :zzz: :zzz: :zzz: :zzz: hope this card picks up
It has, hasn't it?
jameswilson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13497
Joined: 08 Jan 2004, 18:01

Re: The official Brook v Dan fight night discussion thread

Post by jameswilson »

Amir Khan's boxing knowledge is shocking too.
Neil Gee
Super Middleweight
Posts: 4257
Joined: 06 Jul 2013, 15:37

Re: The official Brook v Dan fight night discussion thread

Post by Neil Gee »

I still expect McDonnell to get the stoppage around six
Andrew
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 6108
Joined: 17 Jul 2012, 09:31

Re: The official Brook v Dan fight night discussion thread

Post by Andrew »

Padded record on paper but yegrov is giving it a good go.

I think inactivity will impact him later.
Last edited by Andrew on 28 Mar 2015, 16:57, edited 1 time in total.
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22335
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: The official Brook v Dan fight night discussion thread

Post by Horse »

38-38 Even
Counter-puncher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 39141
Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41

Re: The official Brook v Dan fight night discussion thread

Post by Counter-puncher »

jameswilson wrote:Amir Khan's boxing knowledge is shocking too.

to be fair i doubt there is a subject on earth on which khan could express himself with the eloquence of a particularly bright 12 year old
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22335
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: The official Brook v Dan fight night discussion thread

Post by Horse »

48-47 McDonnell
Boxerbeetle
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 32993
Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59

Re: The official Brook v Dan fight night discussion thread

Post by Boxerbeetle »

Counter-puncher wrote:
Boxerbeetle wrote:
brilo33 wrote:never took to the mcdonnell fighters, when i think jamie said he is not a boxing fan
Didn't an interviewer once have to explain to him who Roberto Duran was?
i found it quite refreshing. Its his job, some boxers (or say footballers like David Batty famously) treat it as nothing more. As long as they approach it professionally what's the problem? God us boxing geeks can be demanding
the fvckers are slogging.their guts out and they are, what, supposed.to spend their spare time gaying out over Willie pep clips on youtube?

id much prefer that than boxers pretending they love the sport when its clearly nothing more than their own vehicle for fame and nothing more
I know what you mean, and I don't expect boxers to have an encyclopedic knowledge of the sport. Just thought it was odd not to have even heard of a very famous predecessor. McDonnell would certainly not be welcome on my pub quiz team :TU:
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22335
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: The official Brook v Dan fight night discussion thread

Post by Horse »

57-57 Even
brilo33
Middleweight
Posts: 7865
Joined: 07 Mar 2014, 16:05

Re: The official Brook v Dan fight night discussion thread

Post by brilo33 »

Counter-puncher wrote:
Boxerbeetle wrote:
brilo33 wrote:never took to the mcdonnell fighters, when i think jamie said he is not a boxing fan
Didn't an interviewer once have to explain to him who Roberto Duran was?
i found it quite refreshing. Its his job, some boxers (or say footballers like David Batty famously) treat it as nothing more. As long as they approach it professionally what's the problem? God us boxing geeks can be demanding
the fvckers are slogging.their guts out and they are, what, supposed.to spend their spare time gaying out over Willie pep clips on youtube?

id much prefer that than boxers pretending they love the sport when its clearly nothing more than their own vehicle for fame and nothing more
true enough , but as a boxing fan feel i have nothing in common with him , we know when we think about it they are all prize fighters. but we ignored that, and we feel they are fighting for their blood, country, people. tell me when you see morales v pacquiao you diddnt think what pride these men have
Post Reply