Froch upsets Nigel Benn

Post Reply
stevieb_8006
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Froch upsets Nigel Benn

Post by stevieb_8006 »

http://www1.skysports.com/boxing/news/1 ... mes-degale

He's my all time fav, but some serious rewriting of history from Benn here. "We fought the best..." Errr it could be argued that you didn't face the best in Britain (graham), let alone the world (RJJ, toney, nunn, kalumbay, mccallum...sure I've missed a few)

Whilst froch has undoubtably faced the best of his era.
keirw
Middleweight
Posts: 2681
Joined: 03 Nov 2013, 10:55

Re: Froch upsets Nigel Benn

Post by keirw »

I get the feeling Ambrose Mendy has asked Benn to question Froch's legacy to try and guilt him into fighting Degale.
Bard of Boxrec
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13112
Joined: 22 Feb 2002, 20:00

Re: Froch upsets Nigel Benn

Post by Bard of Boxrec »

Froch's career eclipses Benn's comprehensively IMO. And Froch would have outlasted Nigel in a fight. What a great matchup it would have been though.
ILikeBeer
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 10938
Joined: 25 Dec 2004, 07:23

Re: Froch upsets Nigel Benn

Post by ILikeBeer »

"Nigel Benn believes Carl Froch should fight James DeGale in order to back up his claims that he is one of the best super middleweights Britain has produced."

:doh: Yeah, Nigel. Whatever....
danamba7
Middleweight
Posts: 2859
Joined: 30 Sep 2013, 09:30

Re: Froch upsets Nigel Benn

Post by danamba7 »

Nigel, Nigel, Nigel... :shame:
jameswilson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13363
Joined: 08 Jan 2004, 18:01

Re: Froch upsets Nigel Benn

Post by jameswilson »

keirw wrote:I get the feeling Ambrose Mendy has asked Benn to question Froch's legacy to try and guilt him into fighting Degale.
Pretty much it I think.
Ketchel
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 866
Joined: 17 Nov 2008, 14:18

Re: Froch upsets Nigel Benn

Post by Ketchel »

This is pretty much the Calzaghe Froch scenario at the tail end of Joe's career. Calzaghe's legacy has not changed because he did not fight Froch. Froch's legacy will not be questioned because he did not fight Degale.
danamba7
Middleweight
Posts: 2859
Joined: 30 Sep 2013, 09:30

Re: Froch upsets Nigel Benn

Post by danamba7 »

Ketchel wrote:This is pretty much the Calzaghe Froch scenario at the tail end of Joe's career. Calzaghe's legacy has not changed because he did not fight Froch. Froch's legacy will not be questioned because he did not fight Degale.
True, both understandable because of the timing.
Stuarty
Super Welterweight
Posts: 27293
Joined: 20 Aug 2014, 10:28

Re: Froch upsets Nigel Benn

Post by Stuarty »

danamba7 wrote:
Ketchel wrote:This is pretty much the Calzaghe Froch scenario at the tail end of Joe's career. Calzaghe's legacy has not changed because he did not fight Froch. Froch's legacy will not be questioned because he did not fight Degale.
True, both understandable because of the timing.
X3
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22331
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Froch upsets Nigel Benn

Post by Horse »

Ketchel wrote:This is pretty much the Calzaghe Froch scenario at the tail end of Joe's career. Calzaghe's legacy has not changed because he did not fight Froch. Froch's legacy will not be questioned because he did not fight Degale.
A win over Froch would have boosted Calzaghe's record and all time standing significantly.

Froch's legacy could also be significantly boosted if he beats DeGale and DeGale goes on to do good things at world level.

So, I see things completely differently.
danamba7
Middleweight
Posts: 2859
Joined: 30 Sep 2013, 09:30

Re: Froch upsets Nigel Benn

Post by danamba7 »

Horse wrote:
Ketchel wrote:This is pretty much the Calzaghe Froch scenario at the tail end of Joe's career. Calzaghe's legacy has not changed because he did not fight Froch. Froch's legacy will not be questioned because he did not fight Degale.
A win over Froch would have boosted Calzaghe's record and all time standing significantly.

Froch's legacy could also be significantly boosted if he beats DeGale and DeGale goes on to do good things at world level.

So, I see things completely differently.
We know
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22331
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Froch upsets Nigel Benn

Post by Horse »

danamba7 wrote:We know
I'll assume that's a compliment.
TheCobra
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3450
Joined: 01 Jan 2009, 15:11

Re: Froch upsets Nigel Benn

Post by TheCobra »

Horse wrote:
Ketchel wrote:This is pretty much the Calzaghe Froch scenario at the tail end of Joe's career. Calzaghe's legacy has not changed because he did not fight Froch. Froch's legacy will not be questioned because he did not fight Degale.
A win over Froch would have boosted Calzaghe's record and all time standing significantly.

Froch's legacy could also be significantly boosted if he beats DeGale and DeGale goes on to do good things at world level.

So, I see things completely differently.
Agree with horse, both legacies could have been boosted, but more so in Calzaghe's case.

Look at where Froch was when he was calling out Joe and he was unbeaten, knocking everyone out and looking like a really dangerous opponent.

DeGale is different in that he's just awkward, he aint gona knock Carl out but he could provide a really awkward night's work. He's also already been beat by George Groves, a man who Carl beat twice. So it's definitely not the same as where Froch was at i.e. unbeaten, powerful punch and fearless style.

Personally I'm not dead keen to see Froch vs DeGale styles wise. What made Groves vs Froch so good was that essentially they both like to get stuck in and both have a KO punch on them. Both get the red mist and get involved in a war at times. DeGale is just a shitbag most the time.
littlekinny
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 255
Joined: 19 Oct 2009, 07:36

Re: Froch upsets Nigel Benn

Post by littlekinny »

TBH Im with Horse and Cobra as well.
Will probably get heat for this but JC only ever beat 3 people that he was not a heavy favourite against (Eubank, Kessler, Lacy). One was past it and another as it turns out seriously over-rated but in fairness that aint JCs fault and you could argue it was JC that ruined him.
Even at the time Froch wouldve been maybe top 5 (id argue) or certainly top 10 (challenge anyone to name 9 more) competitive fights in JCs career.
bripez
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4877
Joined: 11 Feb 2010, 18:07

Re: Froch upsets Nigel Benn

Post by bripez »

littlekinny wrote:TBH Im with Horse and Cobra as well.
Will probably get heat for this but JC only ever beat 3 people that he was not a heavy favourite against (Eubank, Kessler, Lacy). One was past it and another as it turns out seriously over-rated but in fairness that aint JCs fault and you could argue it was JC that ruined him.
Even at the time Froch wouldve been maybe top 5 (id argue) or certainly top 10 (challenge anyone to name 9 more) competitive fights in JCs career.
Got to agree with that.

In my lifetime, Froch has been the standout in terms of taking on and beating all the top boxers, both at home and abroad.

The likes of Calzaghe and Hatton had top careers, but they still don't match the achievements from Froch.

I can understand why he gets annoyed that he does not get the level of recognition from the general public, but being a bit of a nob who is always moaning about not getting the recognition he thinks he deserves is not going to help !
danamba7
Middleweight
Posts: 2859
Joined: 30 Sep 2013, 09:30

Re: Froch upsets Nigel Benn

Post by danamba7 »

bripez wrote:
littlekinny wrote:TBH Im with Horse and Cobra as well.
Will probably get heat for this but JC only ever beat 3 people that he was not a heavy favourite against (Eubank, Kessler, Lacy). One was past it and another as it turns out seriously over-rated but in fairness that aint JCs fault and you could argue it was JC that ruined him.
Even at the time Froch wouldve been maybe top 5 (id argue) or certainly top 10 (challenge anyone to name 9 more) competitive fights in JCs career.
Got to agree with that.

In my lifetime, Froch has been the standout in terms of taking on and beating all the top boxers, both at home and abroad.

The likes of Calzaghe and Hatton had top careers, but they still don't match the achievements from Froch.

I can understand why he gets annoyed that he does not get the level of recognition from the general public, but being a bit of a nob who is always moaning about not getting the recognition he thinks he deserves is not going to help !
Catch 22!
ALI
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2667
Joined: 27 Nov 2003, 14:10

Re: Froch upsets Nigel Benn

Post by ALI »

Froch has a better record than all of them.

In a Froch v Benn fight the smart money would have to be on a Froch win, and probably by KO.

Agree with Benn re DeGale being a real tough fight for Froch, i think Froch knows it to.
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22331
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Froch upsets Nigel Benn

Post by Horse »

ALI wrote:Agree with Benn re DeGale being a real tough fight for Froch, i think Froch knows it to.
It's a real risk, but with real reward.

If Degale beats Dirrell then he's probably No. 3 in the division behind Froch and Ward. He would be a very respectable opponent, as well as being British to raise interest in the fight.

Apart from Ward then there is no better opponent at super middleweight than the winner of DeGale vs Dirrell.
Eddy
Cruiserweight
Posts: 898
Joined: 09 Mar 2011, 13:06

Re: Froch upsets Nigel Benn

Post by Eddy »

We're never going to know who would've won but to me, Nigel Benn is more of a boxing hero then Froch will ever be. As for Benn not fighting RJJ and Toney, I always got the feeling it was them that didn't want to know. The exicitement Eubank & Benn brought to British boxing in the 90's has not been reached since IMO. Froch/Degale/Groves, might have talent but they're not characters!
whiskey
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11956
Joined: 27 Mar 2007, 14:52

Re: Froch upsets Nigel Benn

Post by whiskey »

If Degale looks good against Dirrell, hopefully wins - then Carl will be interested in fighting him probably.

If he looks average and loses, then he won't be arsed about.

The better and more dangerous Degale looks, the more Froch will fancy a piece than vice versa.
TheGman
Middleweight
Posts: 8964
Joined: 10 Oct 2013, 12:37

Re: Froch upsets Nigel Benn

Post by TheGman »

Would benn of entered into a super 6 style tournament with at least 3 of the best of 1993-1995 that would be toney eubank rjj and 2 middleweights coming up i.e steve collins gerald mcClellan? Ill tell u right now the answer would NO cause glass chin benn wouldnt of made it anywer near the semi finals. I used to love watchin benn but c'mon nigel you cant have a go at froch for anythin he has done in his career
TheGman
Middleweight
Posts: 8964
Joined: 10 Oct 2013, 12:37

Re: Froch upsets Nigel Benn

Post by TheGman »

Eddy wrote:We're never going to know who would've won but to me, Nigel Benn is more of a boxing hero then Froch will ever be. As for Benn not fighting RJJ and Toney, I always got the feeling it was them that didn't want to know. The exicitement Eubank & Benn brought to British boxing in the 90's has not been reached since IMO. Froch/Degale/Groves, might have talent but they're not characters!
James Toney called benn and eubank out on british tv sayin he would fight them both in the same night and he would if done and beat the two of them,would of had a harder fight with eubank than benn and rjj would of smoked benns boots remember these two wer the elite fighters of the division,benn would of threw bombs till he got put to sleep but still he would of needed his pillow for either of these two
Tuan_Jim
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Froch upsets Nigel Benn

Post by Tuan_Jim »

James Toney and Roy Jones were extremely keen. It's hard to believe that a boxing fan in 2015 could still be ignorant of this. At one point Jones rang Benn personally to get the fight made and the Dark Destroyer told him 'I'm divorcing my wife, I'll get back to you,' and of course never did.
stevieb_8006
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Froch upsets Nigel Benn

Post by stevieb_8006 »

thechump wrote:Would benn of entered into a super 6 style tournament with at least 3 of the best of 1993-1995 that would be toney eubank rjj and 2 middleweights coming up i.e steve collins gerald mcClellan? Ill tell u right now the answer would NO cause glass chin benn wouldnt of made it anywer near the semi finals. I used to love watchin benn but c'mon nigel you cant have a go at froch for anythin he has done in his career
Glass chins a bit of an exaggeration. Yes he could be tagged and shaken up, but you don't come back from the shots McClellan landed (or Barkley and Eubank for that matter) with a glass chin.
Bard of Boxrec
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13112
Joined: 22 Feb 2002, 20:00

Re: Froch upsets Nigel Benn

Post by Bard of Boxrec »

Tuan_Jim wrote:James Toney and Roy Jones were extremely keen. It's hard to believe that a boxing fan in 2015 could still be ignorant of this. At one point Jones rang Benn personally to get the fight made and the Dark Destroyer told him 'I'm divorcing my wife, I'll get back to you,' and of course never did.
Imagine how humiliating it would have been for Benn though. Jones would have absolutely mullered him and Nige must have known it deep down. Would there have been enough money on the table at any point to tempt Benn? Anyone remember any tentative negotiations?
Post Reply