Again a loss for Wlad
Again a loss for Wlad
he losses every fight based on crabing holding, pushing with his body, leaning over. its DQ every time.
in the jennings fight he wasnt even crabing and holding at every seconde like he does in every other fights, but he should been dq.
ref warned him onces in 3 i believe it was, in 5 he talked to him "gotte stop holding" and than the point deduction in the 10 and even than he
did not stop holding crabing leaning over. wlad lost.
in the jennings fight he wasnt even crabing and holding at every seconde like he does in every other fights, but he should been dq.
ref warned him onces in 3 i believe it was, in 5 he talked to him "gotte stop holding" and than the point deduction in the 10 and even than he
did not stop holding crabing leaning over. wlad lost.
-
Rodian
- Heavyweight

Re: Again a loss for Wlad
true. A competent referee would take away 3-4 points, making the fight close on the scorecards and possibly a draw.
Re: Again a loss for Wlad
And you expect anyone to take you seriously?
Are you drunk, high or clueless? Must be one of them.
Are you drunk, high or clueless? Must be one of them.
Re: Again a loss for Wlad
Ian1973 wrote:And you expect anyone to take you seriously?
Are you drunk, high or clueless? Must be one of them.
no, i am an expert who knows of what he is talking about
if you like what wlad is showing you, than switch to wrestling and watch that on tv, you'll be the happiest man in the world, trust me
Re: Again a loss for Wlad
Chepppaaa wrote:Ian1973 wrote:And you expect anyone to take you seriously?
Are you drunk, high or clueless? Must be one of them.
no, i am an expert who knows of what he is talking about
if you like what wlad is showing you, than switch to wrestling and watch that on tv, you'll be the happiest man in the world, trust me
Er, OK.
Re: Again a loss for Wlad
Rodian wrote:true. A competent referee would take away 3-4 points, making the fight close on the scorecards and possibly a draw.
the ref talked 2-3 times with wlad telling him top stop, wlad always continued, even in the 10 when he got a point deduction, he started to wrestle right away.
normal it should be, 1-2 verbal warning, than point deduction, than DQ. as i am concerened, he was crabing and holding so much from first to 6 round, that he would have been DQ'd right away around the 6 round.
Re: Again a loss for Wlad
Ian1973 wrote:Chepppaaa wrote:Ian1973 wrote:And you expect anyone to take you seriously?
Are you drunk, high or clueless? Must be one of them.
no, i am an expert who knows of what he is talking about
if you like what wlad is showing you, than switch to wrestling and watch that on tv, you'll be the happiest man in the world, trust me
Er, OK.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
trust me, do yourself a favour, if you truly like wlad style, i cant even call it boxing, because it aint boxing, than start watching wrestling, greco roman, you be so happy...its wlad action nonstop, youd be the happiest person alive
-
Freedom2013
- Super Middleweight
- Posts: 3879
- Joined: 26 Nov 2012, 11:35
Re: Again a loss for Wlad
Klitschko wasn't holding all that much tonight, no more than most boxers.
Against Povetkin he did, though.
Against Povetkin he did, though.
-
Baby Face Finster
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 17427
- Joined: 29 Dec 2004, 23:34
Re: Again a loss for Wlad
For someone who claims to know boxing you are pretty dumb. It's 1-2 warnings then a point deduction, followed by a 2nd point deduction and then a DQ on the 3rd infraction not a DQ after a single point deduction.Chepppaaa wrote:Rodian wrote:true. A competent referee would take away 3-4 points, making the fight close on the scorecards and possibly a draw.
the ref talked 2-3 times with wlad telling him top stop, wlad always continued, even in the 10 when he got a point deduction, he started to wrestle right away.
normal it should be, 1-2 verbal warning, than point deduction, than DQ. as i am concerened, he was crabing and holding so much from first to 6 round, that he would have been DQ'd right away around the 6 round.
Re: Again a loss for Wlad
no, i am an expert who knows of what he is talking about
if you like what wlad is showing you, than switch to wrestling and watch that on tv, you'll be the happiest man in the world, trust me
Er, OK.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Trust me. Do yourself a favour, if you truly like Wlad's style. I cant even call it boxing, because it isn't boxing, then start watching wrestling, Greco Roman, you'll be so happy. It's Wlad action non stop. You'd be the happiest person alive.
I can see you're not the brightest so I've helped you out a bit with your English grammar.
Re: Again a loss for Wlad
Freedom2013 wrote:Klitschko wasn't holding all that much tonight, no more than most boxers.
Agree. Certainly not enough for a points deduction IMO.
Re: Again a loss for Wlad
noFreedom2013 wrote:Klitschko wasn't holding all that much tonight, no more than most boxers.
Against Povetkin he did, though.
Re: Again a loss for Wlad
Baby Face Finster wrote:For someone who claims to know boxing you are pretty dumb. It's 1-2 warnings then a point deduction, followed by a 2nd point deduction and then a DQ on the 3rd infraction not a DQ after a single point deduction.Chepppaaa wrote:Rodian wrote:true. A competent referee would take away 3-4 points, making the fight close on the scorecards and possibly a draw.
the ref talked 2-3 times with wlad telling him top stop, wlad always continued, even in the 10 when he got a point deduction, he started to wrestle right away.
normal it should be, 1-2 verbal warning, than point deduction, than DQ. as i am concerened, he was crabing and holding so much from first to 6 round, that he would have been DQ'd right away around the 6 round.
but you bright ahhaahahahaha
Re: Again a loss for Wlad
Crabing isn't a word. I don't know why you keep saying this.Chepppaaa wrote:he losses every fight based on crabing holding, pushing with his body, leaning over. its DQ every time.
Re: Again a loss for Wlad
Lackeos wrote:Crabing isn't a word. I don't know why you keep saying this.Chepppaaa wrote:he losses every fight based on crabing holding, pushing with his body, leaning over. its DQ every time.
but you get my point....are we in a forum or in a school?
are we talking boxing, or is everybody dickriding on who is the spelling king?
shout out to my homies in laky city and gainsville florida eeehhhh......!!!! had such a great time there. you deliver.
Re: Again a loss for Wlad
Because he is an "expert". He keeps repeating that hoping that somebody will believe him, but fails due to utter nonsense of most of his posts like this one. Even if another point would have been taken from Wlad, he would still win most of the rounds with two even ones, and he certainly didn't deserve a DQ in this fight.Lackeos wrote:Crabing isn't a word. I don't know why you keep saying this.Chepppaaa wrote:he losses every fight based on crabing holding, pushing with his body, leaning over. its DQ every time.
Re: Again a loss for Wlad
Chepppaaa wrote:Lackeos wrote:Crabing isn't a word. I don't know why you keep saying this.Chepppaaa wrote:he losses every fight based on crabing holding, pushing with his body, leaning over. its DQ every time.
but you get my point....are we in a forum or in a school?
are we talking boxing, or is everybody dickriding on who is the spelling king?
shout out to my homies in laky city and gainsville florida eeehhhh......!!!! had such a great time there. you deliver.
It's not easy to understand what the hell you are talking about. Did you attend school at all?
Re: Again a loss for Wlad
Yes, he attended an Expert SchoolIan1973 wrote:Chepppaaa wrote: but you get my point....are we in a forum or in a school?
are we talking boxing, or is everybody dickriding on who is the spelling king?
shout out to my homies in laky city and gainsville florida eeehhhh......!!!! had such a great time there. you deliver.
It's not easy to understand what the hell you are talking about. Did you attend school at all?
-
Baby Face Finster
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 17427
- Joined: 29 Dec 2004, 23:34
Re: Again a loss for Wlad
Much brighter than you but then again most people on here are.Chepppaaa wrote:Baby Face Finster wrote:For someone who claims to know boxing you are pretty dumb. It's 1-2 warnings then a point deduction, followed by a 2nd point deduction and then a DQ on the 3rd infraction not a DQ after a single point deduction.Chepppaaa wrote:
the ref talked 2-3 times with wlad telling him top stop, wlad always continued, even in the 10 when he got a point deduction, he started to wrestle right away.
normal it should be, 1-2 verbal warning, than point deduction, than DQ. as i am concerened, he was crabing and holding so much from first to 6 round, that he would have been DQ'd right away around the 6 round.
but you bright ahhaahahahaha![]()
its a huge difference
Re: Again a loss for Wlad
It's not easy to understand what the hell you are talking about. Did you attend school at all?[/quote]
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
not easy to understand. grabing and crabing....oh what a difference, real hard to not understand, when talk about wlad wrestling style
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
not easy to understand. grabing and crabing....oh what a difference, real hard to not understand, when talk about wlad wrestling style
Re: Again a loss for Wlad
Yes because no 12 round boxing match should have any holding whatsoever. F'n hell, if there was no holding in this sport the fighters would keel over and die in the ring one after another. There HAS to be some holding, have you ever boxed, do you have any idea how exhausting it is to fight that long without taking any breathers whatsoever? You're a damn idiot.Chepppaaa wrote:he losses every fight based on crabing holding, pushing with his body, leaning over. its DQ every time.
in the jennings fight he wasnt even crabing and holding at every seconde like he does in every other fights, but he should been dq.
ref warned him onces in 3 i believe it was, in 5 he talked to him "gotte stop holding" and than the point deduction in the 10 and even than he
did not stop holding crabing leaning over. wlad lost.
Re: Again a loss for Wlad
diddy wrote:Yes because no 12 round boxing match should have any holding whatsoever. F'n hell, if there was no holding in this sport the fighters would keel over and die in the ring one after another. There HAS to be some holding, have you ever boxed, do you have any idea how exhausting it is to fight that long without taking any breathers whatsoever? You're a damn idiot.Chepppaaa wrote:he losses every fight based on crabing holding, pushing with his body, leaning over. its DQ every time.
in the jennings fight he wasnt even crabing and holding at every seconde like he does in every other fights, but he should been dq.
ref warned him onces in 3 i believe it was, in 5 he talked to him "gotte stop holding" and than the point deduction in the 10 and even than he
did not stop holding crabing leaning over. wlad lost.
in lower weights they fight all the time without excessive holding. if wlad cant do it, than it is his problem. if heavyweights cant do it, than its theirs problem. but lower weights, they have no problem giving an excsiting fight with rare holding. what does it tell us, heavyweights dont train enough on condition.
there is a huge difference, between 1 not holding, 2 holding every now and than, 3 holding a lot and 4that sh&(t what wlad is doing 4 excessive holding and wrestling. against 1-2 i dont have nothing, even 3 is okay it its not to much, but 4 should be a dq every time.
-
thomasjkelley
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 391
- Joined: 12 Mar 2011, 03:58
Re: Again a loss for Wlad
Wladimir uses clinching as a definitive part of his overall strategy and I didn't think he was excessive tonight. If anything, your referee from Canada, Michael Griffin, overly involved himself. How many times did he warn Wlad to stop pushing when he shoved off with his jab? I've never seen a fighter warned for pushing in that manner before. Technically, if you're not snapping off your jab with enthusiasm, then you're pushing it. Heavyweight fights in general are uglier than other divisions, tonight wasn't ugly. Holding is a foul that is not supposed to be allowed but clinching is a legitimate tactic and Wladimir simply does it well. If you noticed, many of Klitschko's holds/clinches happened as Jennings lowered his shoulder into his chest and wrapped his left arm around Wlad's waist. I had no problem with his technique tonight and I was rooting against him......I desperately want to see an American reign as heavyweight champ once again. The only issue I have with Klitschko's style is that it can make for boring fights like tonight.
-
hurricanemitch14
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 828
- Joined: 13 Apr 2004, 02:35
Re: Again a loss for Wlad
Wlad wasnt bad tonight after the warning in rd 5. After that it was a normal boxing match. Damn near impossible to not hold when ur 6'5 and fight a jennings who likes to get inside and grind. Wlad should have 7 losses tho for holding.
Re: Again a loss for Wlad
Wlad isnt 5'6 115 lbs. Thats like saying a UFC heavyweight should have the cardio of Demetrious Johnson, a flyweight. He is a HUGE man. Huge men arent going to have the cardio of guys the size of 12 yr old boys. Also, as has been said, shorter guys have to lunge inside to get close to hitting him. Their torsos are going to collide, whats he supposed to do, let them punch him in the face? Holding is inevitable. Unless you're a dumb fighter who doesnt know/do what it takes to win.