May-Pac undercard
May-Pac undercard
Does anyone know if any of the undercard fights should be exciting? I've never seen any of them fight. Should any of them be good fights? And do any of the fighters have any chance of being a future world champion (in your opinion)?
-
jujigatame
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 7475
- Joined: 30 Oct 2004, 21:08
Re: May-Pac undercard
Lomachenko and Santa Cruz are both world-class fighters but both fights are easy setup fights against no-hopers.
-
SenorPipino
- Super Middleweight
- Posts: 6055
- Joined: 09 Jan 2013, 19:40
Re: May-Pac undercard
Santa Cruz is a talented and exciting fighter, but is he ever going to make a real title defense?
All his opponents are at least 50-1 underdogs, and it's not because Santa Cruz is considered an ATG.
I see that designated opponent Jose Cayetano has lost 2 of his last 4 bouts, including his latest match---a one-sided defeat to the dreaded Enrique Bernache.
Quite a resume to warrant a title shot.
Somehow Santa Cruz is only listed as a 100-1 favorite.
In comparison, Lomachenko is a relatively light 50-1 choice in his undercard bout.
I hope no one dozes off during the scintillating undercard and misses the main event.
All his opponents are at least 50-1 underdogs, and it's not because Santa Cruz is considered an ATG.
I see that designated opponent Jose Cayetano has lost 2 of his last 4 bouts, including his latest match---a one-sided defeat to the dreaded Enrique Bernache.
Quite a resume to warrant a title shot.
Somehow Santa Cruz is only listed as a 100-1 favorite.
In comparison, Lomachenko is a relatively light 50-1 choice in his undercard bout.
I hope no one dozes off during the scintillating undercard and misses the main event.
Last edited by SenorPipino on 29 Apr 2015, 18:09, edited 1 time in total.
Re: May-Pac undercard
Undercard is a god damn abortion.
Re: May-Pac undercard
There's an undercard? lol
Re: May-Pac undercard
Yeah, undercard is pretty weak.
Gonna be A LOT of dead air before the main event starts.
Gonna be A LOT of dead air before the main event starts.
-
FloydtheDuck
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 161
- Joined: 21 Nov 2010, 12:16
Re: May-Pac undercard
Not trying to be difficult. But I disagree. Think the undercard is fine
Why waste a high profile matchup when all that anyone cares about is floyd/manny
As far as lopsided opposition. I think it's great idea as well
This is gonna get millions of viewers ,even for undercard
Building up Santa cruz & lomachenko is easier with average viewers seeing them walk over and dominate another fighter
Don't need them going 12 rounds with another skilled fighter
Look at pac Bradley 2 I think it was. 4 12 round fights , not one knockdown. That's not the type of fights the average joe wants
Why waste a high profile matchup when all that anyone cares about is floyd/manny
As far as lopsided opposition. I think it's great idea as well
This is gonna get millions of viewers ,even for undercard
Building up Santa cruz & lomachenko is easier with average viewers seeing them walk over and dominate another fighter
Don't need them going 12 rounds with another skilled fighter
Look at pac Bradley 2 I think it was. 4 12 round fights , not one knockdown. That's not the type of fights the average joe wants
-
ajwesty13
- Heavyweight

Re: May-Pac undercard
koolkc107 wrote:Yeah, undercard is pretty weak.
Gonna be A LOT of dead air before the main event starts.
agree x2
Re: May-Pac undercard
I think they could have got better guys and still accomplished building Lomo and Santa Cruz up.FloydtheDuck wrote:Not trying to be difficult. But I disagree. Think the undercard is fine
Why waste a high profile matchup when all that anyone cares about is floyd/manny
As far as lopsided opposition. I think it's great idea as well
This is gonna get millions of viewers ,even for undercard
Building up Santa cruz & lomachenko is easier with average viewers seeing them walk over and dominate another fighter
Don't need them going 12 rounds with another skilled fighter
Look at pac Bradley 2 I think it was. 4 12 round fights , not one knockdown. That's not the type of fights the average joe wants
But, I get what you are saying.
Don't agree with it but it's a decent take.
Re: May-Pac undercard
Thanks for the info.
That sucks that none of the fights are worthwhile. I wish they could've spared 1% of their purse for the boxing community to get behind some strong up-and-comers. But, I guess those days of great undercards on PPV ended in the early 90s.
That sucks that none of the fights are worthwhile. I wish they could've spared 1% of their purse for the boxing community to get behind some strong up-and-comers. But, I guess those days of great undercards on PPV ended in the early 90s.
-
kidbazooka1
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 959
- Joined: 14 Dec 2007, 13:56
Re: May-Pac undercard
The Santa cruz situation is just plain sad this guy has the potential to be one of the most exciting guys in his division, yet his prime years are being wasted away fighting cans.
Re: May-Pac undercard
Frampton and Quigg would handily take care of Leo IMO
-
kidbazooka1
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 959
- Joined: 14 Dec 2007, 13:56
Re: May-Pac undercard
Nope.macaca wrote:Frampton and Quigg would handily take care of Leo IMO
Frampton would be a tougher fight but Leo beats him to.
Isnt Quigg fighting Nonito?
Donaire will light his ass up do doubt in my mind.
Both Frampton and Quigg are grossly overrated on these boards.