Birmingham and Texas discussion thread
Re: Birmingham and Texas discussion thread
"you cant argue with the judges" .......Nick Halling should just f*ck right off. He is a massive bellend. Stick to the NFL u utter pudendum.
Re: Birmingham and Texas discussion thread
Stick that fight in Glasgow, with a neutral referee and there's only one winner.GreedyG wrote:Rematch in Scotland. He deserves one.
Re: Birmingham and Texas discussion thread
celtic parkexpe wrote:Stick that fight in Glasgow, with a neutral referee and there's only one winner.GreedyG wrote:Rematch in Scotland. He deserves one.
-
ThereByTheGrace
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 4016
- Joined: 04 Sep 2010, 05:22
Re: Birmingham and Texas discussion thread
Am I the only one laughing at the irony of Burns being shafted by the "Home Decision?. Good effort but not good enough Im afraid.
-
MightyWarrior
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 13249
- Joined: 23 Jan 2003, 14:01
Re: Birmingham and Texas discussion thread
Halling is a complete plankBaboon wrote:"you cant argue with the judges" .......Nick Halling should just f*ck right off. He is a massive bellend. Stick to the NFL u utter pudendum.
Re: Birmingham and Texas discussion thread
boxing dead bull. where having great fights weekly
Re: Birmingham and Texas discussion thread
MightyWarrior wrote:Halling is a complete plankBaboon wrote:"you cant argue with the judges" .......Nick Halling should just f*ck right off. He is a massive bellend. Stick to the NFL u utter pudendum.
He's useless, hasn't a clue.
-
thepocketrocket
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3283
- Joined: 16 Jan 2003, 06:26
Re: Birmingham and Texas discussion thread
Close fight, Figueroa won just. The result isn't the issue, it is the width of the scorecards.
A bit like AA v Smith
A bit like AA v Smith
Re: Birmingham and Texas discussion thread
Sounds like daylight robbery, truely gutted for Burns but glad he's back to form.
Looks like Haymon may have the ref and 3 judges in his pocket. Brits beware, fcuk fighting Stateside against one of his boys on his PBC shows.
Looks like Haymon may have the ref and 3 judges in his pocket. Brits beware, fcuk fighting Stateside against one of his boys on his PBC shows.
Re: Birmingham and Texas discussion thread
I hope you are.ThereByTheGrace wrote:Am I the only one laughing at the irony of Burns being shafted by the "Home Decision?.
Re: Birmingham and Texas discussion thread
very true. i will admit that. i am a burns fanThereByTheGrace wrote:Am I the only one laughing at the irony of Burns being shafted by the "Home Decision?. Good effort but not good enough Im afraid.
Re: Birmingham and Texas discussion thread
Credit to Burns did not think he had a performance like that in him. Just wish he had the same ref and judges McDonald had
-
BigCheese1986
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 617
- Joined: 08 Nov 2008, 15:41
Re: Birmingham and Texas discussion thread
^^Thisthepocketrocket wrote:Close fight, Figueroa won just. The result isn't the issue, it is the width of the scorecards.
A bit like AA v Smith
Close fight no issue with Figueroa winning but 117-109 is insulting to Burns.
Re: Birmingham and Texas discussion thread
ALI wrote:Sounds like daylight robbery, truely gutted for Burns but glad he's back to form.
Looks like Haymon may have the ref and 3 judges in his pocket. Brits beware, fcuk fighting Stateside against one of his boys on his PBC shows.
No it's not. Figueroa edged it, don't forget there were two point deductions, like it or not. It was close though, one round maybe two but the cards are just silly.
Re: Birmingham and Texas discussion thread
And the point deductions were robberies from a referee worse than Ian John-Lewis.Ian1973 wrote:ALI wrote:Sounds like daylight robbery, truely gutted for Burns but glad he's back to form.
Looks like Haymon may have the ref and 3 judges in his pocket. Brits beware, fcuk fighting Stateside against one of his boys on his PBC shows.
No it's not. Figueroa edged it, don't forget there were two point deductions, like it or not. It was close though, one round maybe two but the cards are just silly.
Re: Birmingham and Texas discussion thread
ref was a joke grabbing the fighters arms while there were fighting then backing of , what's he doing
Re: Birmingham and Texas discussion thread
expe wrote:And the point deductions were robberies from a referee worse than Ian John-Lewis.Ian1973 wrote:ALI wrote:Sounds like daylight robbery, truely gutted for Burns but glad he's back to form.
Looks like Haymon may have the ref and 3 judges in his pocket. Brits beware, fcuk fighting Stateside against one of his boys on his PBC shows.
No it's not. Figueroa edged it, don't forget there were two point deductions, like it or not. It was close though, one round maybe two but the cards are just silly.
That's another issue though. Once the ref gives them you can't ignore them.
Re: Birmingham and Texas discussion thread
Its more of a Texas thing, Brook won against a Haymon fighter remember in a close'ish fightALI wrote:Sounds like daylight robbery, truely gutted for Burns but glad he's back to form.
Looks like Haymon may have the ref and 3 judges in his pocket. Brits beware, fcuk fighting Stateside against one of his boys on his PBC shows.
-
ThereByTheGrace
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 4016
- Joined: 04 Sep 2010, 05:22
Re: Birmingham and Texas discussion thread
I am not getting at Burns performance, he is a gutsy brave fighter, but he was holding a lot and maybe if he stuck to boxing more he would've got a fairer crack at the whip. He has had a fair few home decisions in the past so its a case of evening these things up. He lost against Beltran and got away with it, no point in crying wolf if it goes the other way. It was a game effort, the scorecards were ridiculous but we all knew he would have to ko the guy to win before it started.
He won't be the first or the last. It's just boxing.
He won't be the first or the last. It's just boxing.
Re: Birmingham and Texas discussion thread
Were the point deductions warranted in anyway, sounds to me like they were not. By the sounds of it Fig was the one more worthy of getting points deducted.Ian1973 wrote:ALI wrote:Sounds like daylight robbery, truely gutted for Burns but glad he's back to form.
Looks like Haymon may have the ref and 3 judges in his pocket. Brits beware, fcuk fighting Stateside against one of his boys on his PBC shows.
No it's not. Figueroa edged it, don't forget there were two point deductions, like it or not. It was close though, one round maybe two but the cards are just silly.
Re: Birmingham and Texas discussion thread
Funny how when money and ward hold up close people say Defensive master class.
Need to get together and get watt out of sky what a helmet!
Need to get together and get watt out of sky what a helmet!
Re: Birmingham and Texas discussion thread
ALI wrote:Were the point deductions warranted in anyway, sounds to me like they were not. By the sounds of it Fig was the one more worthy of getting points deducted.Ian1973 wrote:ALI wrote:Sounds like daylight robbery, truely gutted for Burns but glad he's back to form.
Looks like Haymon may have the ref and 3 judges in his pocket. Brits beware, fcuk fighting Stateside against one of his boys on his PBC shows.
No it's not. Figueroa edged it, don't forget there were two point deductions, like it or not. It was close though, one round maybe two but the cards are just silly.
One probably. Two no. The ref was as bad as the judges.
Re: Birmingham and Texas discussion thread
I wonder if there will be any complaints from the English (all expenses paid) officials. I recognised one tonight ring side. ;;-)
Re: Birmingham and Texas discussion thread
I had Burns a point up even after the deductions. I cant think of a clear quality punch Figueroa landed. It was similar in some ways to Brook Porter except Burns landed more than 4 times.
Re: Birmingham and Texas discussion thread
Ok, but what about Fig, was he worthy of a point deduction maybe? Sounds like the ref has been very opportunistic and outright biased in favour of Fig.Ian1973 wrote:ALI wrote:Were the point deductions warranted in anyway, sounds to me like they were not. By the sounds of it Fig was the one more worthy of getting points deducted.Ian1973 wrote:
No it's not. Figueroa edged it, don't forget there were two point deductions, like it or not. It was close though, one round maybe two but the cards are just silly.
One probably. Two no. The ref was as bad as the judges.