PACQUIAO WAS BORING

hurricanemitch14
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 828
Joined: 13 Apr 2004, 02:35

Re: PACQUIAO WAS BORING

Post by hurricanemitch14 »

Just rewatched it.........pacman wasnt hurt he didnt know what to do. He didnt cut the ring and just followed Floyd around and ate counter rights all night.

Pacman showed that hes a cry baby and reminded me why i dont cheer for him.


So pacman if u read this get back on steroids and fight dudes at catchweights.
Evander
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 14080
Joined: 07 May 2005, 16:49

Re: PACQUIAO WAS BORING

Post by Evander »

I think a rematch is a strong possibility as it was before the first bell rang.
Among the positives for Manny Pacquiao were his power, I was a little surprised he actually got through to Floyd in terms of getting his attention.
His volume was ok as was his intensity, they got all of that right.
So what is the problem ?
A number of things, Manny and his team for some reason unbeknown to me may not have a clear understanding of who Floyd Mayweather is as a boxer.
By the mid rounds it was clear how Floyd was defending himself much like he'd done in the past, so you would have assumed Manny's team would know that.
When it became obvious that they couldn't adjust their game plan was a turning point, here's the shot ... intensity can work for you in a number of ways and one of them is you stick to the same thing over and over again.
So Floyd knew what he was going to do much of the time based on a number of things, it's like getting a millisecond heads up, they're predictable.
That's not to say Pacquiao hasn't got it in himself to vastly improve his performance because it wasn't really him physically, everything he brought to the fight was in good working order.
Manny Pacquiao has no excuses and he knows it as I feel most people do.
I'm not plugging a rematch but if one happened it's a no brainer to watch it.
caldo2025
Super Welterweight
Posts: 4417
Joined: 16 Dec 2014, 07:37

Re: PACQUIAO WAS BORING

Post by caldo2025 »

Just can't leave it alone, can ya? Who cares dude? Everyone is over it now. We all saw what a fight SHOULD look like last night. Canelo made a fan out of me last night. He realizes what the fans what and guess what, he gives it to them. There's never been a Floyd PPV fight that has been worth the money spent for it.

Canelo 24 years old and already fought a tougher schedule than Floyd and he's 40..
NateJR
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 1181
Joined: 03 Jul 2012, 19:58

Re: PACQUIAO WAS BORING

Post by NateJR »

caldo2025 wrote:Just can't leave it alone, can ya? Who cares dude? Everyone is over it now. We all saw what a fight SHOULD look like last night. Canelo made a fan out of me last night. He realizes what the fans what and guess what, he gives it to them. There's never been a Floyd PPV fight that has been worth the money spent for it.

Canelo 24 years old and already fought a tougher schedule than Floyd and he's 40..
Have you forgotten that Floyd already easily beat Canelo? Canelo is a big kid, hits hard, has good skills and is very young. He's a great young fighter, no doubt. As far as not enjoying Floyds fights, that's a opinion, I enjoy seeing technical brilliance in the ring.

I would just as much rather pay and see 12 rounds of skill on display rather than a 3 round mismatch. At least last weekend you had two of the most skilled fighters in the ring, the level of skill in the ring was very high last weekend. In the Alvarez/Kirkland fight you saw one skilled fighter in the ring against a over matched club fighter. So, in your case you'd rather pay to watch a mismatch, rather than the 2 best fighters in the sport? Good on you lol.
caldo2025
Super Welterweight
Posts: 4417
Joined: 16 Dec 2014, 07:37

Re: PACQUIAO WAS BORING

Post by caldo2025 »

NateJR wrote:
caldo2025 wrote:Just can't leave it alone, can ya? Who cares dude? Everyone is over it now. We all saw what a fight SHOULD look like last night. Canelo made a fan out of me last night. He realizes what the fans what and guess what, he gives it to them. There's never been a Floyd PPV fight that has been worth the money spent for it.

Canelo 24 years old and already fought a tougher schedule than Floyd and he's 40..
Have you forgotten that Floyd already easily beat Canelo? Canelo is a big kid, hits hard, has good skills and is very young. He's a great young fighter, no doubt. As far as not enjoying Floyds fights, that's a opinion, I enjoy seeing technical brilliance in the ring.

I would just as much rather pay and see 12 rounds of skill on display rather than a 3 round mismatch. At least last weekend you had two of the most skilled fighters in the ring, the level of skill in the ring was very high last weekend. In the Alvarez/Kirkland fight you saw one skilled fighter in the ring against a over matched club fighter. So, in your case you'd rather pay to watch a mismatch, rather than the 2 best fighters in the sport? Good on you lol.
I'm clearly not saying that Canelo could beat Floyd. What i'm saying is that this kid gets "it". He's rather lose a fight than have his hand raised in a boring Floyd-like fight. That stuff never has bothered Floyd. He couldn't care less if fans got their money's worth and that's why he'll never go down in the top 10 boxers of all time much less TBE. When Canelo hangs em up in 13 years, his record may be 82-6 or so but he will beloved everywhere in the world and I wouldn't be surprised if he's made more money than Floyd has. Look at Canelo's last 9 fights. Not a dud in the bunch (maybe lopez but that was a fun fight). Canelo just demolished Anguillo and Kirkland. Two guys that have been feared for years. This kid doesn't care and i love it. You are looking at the next PPV king of boxing no matter how much you adore that trackstar Mayweather.
KBB
Super Welterweight
Posts: 2809
Joined: 11 Oct 2014, 23:33

Re: PACQUIAO WAS BORING

Post by KBB »

hurricanemitch14 wrote:Just rewatched it.........pacman wasnt hurt he didnt know what to do. He didnt cut the ring and just followed Floyd around and ate counter rights all night.

Pacman showed that hes a cry baby and reminded me why i dont cheer for him.


So pacman if u read this get back on steroids and fight dudes at catchweights.
:lol:
hhaehre
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6429
Joined: 23 Oct 2008, 07:26

Re: PACQUIAO WAS BORING

Post by hhaehre »

NateJR wrote:In the Alvarez/Kirkland fight you saw one skilled fighter in the ring against a over matched club fighter. So, in your case you'd rather pay to watch a mismatch, rather than the 2 best fighters in the sport? Good on you lol.
Kirkland isn't a club fighter and the whole lol thing is getting real old dude.
KBB
Super Welterweight
Posts: 2809
Joined: 11 Oct 2014, 23:33

Re: PACQUIAO WAS BORING

Post by KBB »

caldo2025 wrote:Just can't leave it alone, can ya? Who cares dude? Everyone is over it now. We all saw what a fight SHOULD look like last night. Canelo made a fan out of me last night. He realizes what the fans what and guess what, he gives it to them. There's never been a Floyd PPV fight that has been worth the money spent for it.

Canelo 24 years old and already fought a tougher schedule than Floyd and he's 40..
lol to Canelo fighting a tougher schedule than Floyd, that's straight up BS there, do you want to run down their resumes here??

You care because you responded with whinery and mythical BS about him having a tougher schedule, please GTFO with that BS.

If you think that fight with a James No Defense, Slow and Easy to Hit Kirkland is comparable to two the very best and fastest fighters in the sport then you are delusional.

Manny or Floyd would've picked Kirkland off even quicker with the way he fought, I'm not saying they'd necessarily KO him but it would be an easy bout for either man with how easy it was to hit James and how slow he is.
caldo2025
Super Welterweight
Posts: 4417
Joined: 16 Dec 2014, 07:37

Re: PACQUIAO WAS BORING

Post by caldo2025 »

KBB wrote:
caldo2025 wrote:Just can't leave it alone, can ya? Who cares dude? Everyone is over it now. We all saw what a fight SHOULD look like last night. Canelo made a fan out of me last night. He realizes what the fans what and guess what, he gives it to them. There's never been a Floyd PPV fight that has been worth the money spent for it.

Canelo 24 years old and already fought a tougher schedule than Floyd and he's 40..
lol to Canelo fighting a tougher schedule than Floyd, that's straight up BS there, do you want to run down their resumes here??

You care because you responded with whinery and mythical BS about him having a tougher schedule, please GTFO with that BS.

If you think that fight with a James No Defense, Slow and Easy to Hit Kirkland is comparable to two the very best and fastest fighters in the sport then you are delusional.

Manny or Floyd would've picked Kirkland off even quicker with the way he fought, I'm not saying they'd necessarily KO him but it would be an easy bout for either man with how easy it was to hit James and how slow he is.[/quote

Canelo hand picked his last 3 fights and all 3 were against boxers that have been avoided and feared. Oscar has publicly disagreed with all three opponents as a typical promoter wants to keep their star boxers away dangerous boxers like that. Anyone can say that X would have beaten Z the day after the fight but it takes balls to take these fights and Canelo should get credit for that and these wins. 3 rounds of action Saturday Night was FAR more entertaining than the Dancing With the Stars performance Floyd put on the week before. He's only 24 too. True boxing fans have to appreciate the boxers trying to do it right.
KBB
Super Welterweight
Posts: 2809
Joined: 11 Oct 2014, 23:33

Re: PACQUIAO WAS BORING

Post by KBB »

caldo2025 wrote:Canelo hand picked his last 3 fights and all 3 were against boxers that have been avoided and feared. Oscar has publicly disagreed with all three opponents as a typical promoter wants to keep their star boxers away dangerous boxers like that. Anyone can say that X would have beaten Z the day after the fight but it takes balls to take these fights and Canelo should get credit for that and these wins. 3 rounds of action Saturday Night was FAR more entertaining than the Dancing With the Stars performance Floyd put on the week before. He's only 24 too. True boxing fans have to appreciate the boxers trying to do it right.
You never specified a time period, you made a general statement that Canelo's schedule was better than Floyd's. You claim it was a dancing with stars performance but you failed to blame your boy MP for not being able to do sh*t. We do appreciate Canelo but you cannot compare Kirkland to a Manny Pacquiao, do you think Canelo would've dominated Manny the way he was able to do to James??

Stop your whining, you are looking desperately pathetic complaining about the same old sh*t over and over again. Manny lost, get over it.
koolkc107
Middleweight
Posts: 2032
Joined: 31 Oct 2013, 10:54

Re: PACQUIAO WAS BORING

Post by koolkc107 »

I tried to start a thread about this next but I guess the mod is a PacTard.

Next time some of you watch the fight (and I am sure some Pac fanboys who still can't believe how easily their hero was undressed will take several more occasions to cry in their beer) count the number of times Bayless has to separate the fighters.

I get about 20 times, more or less.

That is less than twice per round on average.

How much proof do you folks need?

Your guy got outlanded, even in powershots, by a lot.

Floyd did not hold this fight as much as he has in others.

But, you don't want to admit how thorough the schooling was so you going the old standbys: he ran and he held.

Floyd didn't do either.

He boxed Manny's ears off.
KBB
Super Welterweight
Posts: 2809
Joined: 11 Oct 2014, 23:33

Re: PACQUIAO WAS BORING

Post by KBB »

koolkc107 wrote:I tried to start a thread about this next but I guess the mod is a PacTard.

Next time some of you watch the fight (and I am sure some Pac fanboys who still can't believe how easily their hero was undressed will take several more occasions to cry in their beer) count the number of times Bayless has to separate the fighters.

I get about 20 times, more or less.

That is less than twice per round on average.

How much proof do you folks need?

Your guy got outlanded, even in powershots, by a lot.

Floyd did not hold this fight as much as he has in others.

But, you don't want to admit how thorough the schooling was so you going the old standbys: he ran and he held.

Floyd didn't do either.

He boxed Manny's ears off.
It's the same people here crying over and over again:

Floydtheduck
impractical poster
caldo2025
Ricky
ClivePatrickLyons
Cheap Ass
Bnovelist
hhaehre

They are all truly pathetic, the fight is already over and damn near every fighter in boxing has posted a video saying how Floyd won it easily, nearly every boxing expert/writer has said that Floyd won it easily and that Manny got shutdown and mostly ineffective and we have these pathetic individuals here crying in their beers and eating sour grapes stating how they thought Manny won.

Sore Losers all of them are, it is a truly pathetic site to witness as these few BUTTHURT individuals continually cry.


All bonafide sore loser ass pacTURDS.
hhaehre
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6429
Joined: 23 Oct 2008, 07:26

Re: PACQUIAO WAS BORING

Post by hhaehre »

KBB wrote:
koolkc107 wrote:I tried to start a thread about this next but I guess the mod is a PacTard.

Next time some of you watch the fight (and I am sure some Pac fanboys who still can't believe how easily their hero was undressed will take several more occasions to cry in their beer) count the number of times Bayless has to separate the fighters.

I get about 20 times, more or less.

That is less than twice per round on average.

How much proof do you folks need?

Your guy got outlanded, even in powershots, by a lot.

Floyd did not hold this fight as much as he has in others.

But, you don't want to admit how thorough the schooling was so you going the old standbys: he ran and he held.

Floyd didn't do either.

He boxed Manny's ears off.
It's the same people here crying over and over again:

Floydtheduck
impractical poster
caldo2025
Ricky
ClivePatrickLyons
Cheap Ass
Bnovelist
hhaehre

They are all truly pathetic, the fight is already over and damn near every fighter in boxing has posted a video saying how Floyd won it easily, nearly every boxing expert/writer has said that Floyd won it easily and that Manny got shutdown and mostly ineffective and we have these pathetic individuals here crying in their beers and eating sour grapes stating how they thought Manny won.

Sore Losers all of them are, it is a truly pathetic site to witness as these few BUTTHURT individuals continually cry.


All bonafide sore loser ass pacTURDS.
I challenge you to dig up a single post where I say Floyd didn't win easily. I had it 8-4 in his favor, a clear win. But that's not enough for you, I also have to love Floyd and find him exciting to watch.
KBB
Super Welterweight
Posts: 2809
Joined: 11 Oct 2014, 23:33

Re: PACQUIAO WAS BORING

Post by KBB »

hhaehre wrote:I challenge you to dig up a single post where I say Floyd didn't win easily. I had it 8-4 in his favor, a clear win. But that's not enough for you, I also have to love Floyd and find him exciting to watch.
My bad, my apologies and no, you don't have to love him or find him exciting.
JeanClaude Van Damme
Middleweight
Posts: 188
Joined: 29 Nov 2013, 00:55

Re: PACQUIAO WAS BORING

Post by JeanClaude Van Damme »

Won 4 rounds with one arm.
Post Reply