Has Hearn Ever Put One of His Fighters in With The Division Number One?

Post Reply
Happy Slapper
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 499
Joined: 20 Jul 2008, 16:22

Has Hearn Ever Put One of His Fighters in With The Division Number One?

Post by Happy Slapper »

Question is in the title. Froch fought Ward when he wasn't with Hearn, and so far hasn't had a rematch. Perhaps you could argue Bellew v Stevenson but I would say Kovalev was number one light heavy even when Bellew fought Stevenson.

Anyone think of any?
bripez
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4877
Joined: 11 Feb 2010, 18:07

Re: Has Hearn Ever Put One of His Fighters in With The Division Number One?

Post by bripez »

The boy Eddie is not averse to throwing his lads in away from home and against the odds - and I can't think of one example where this ended with his boxer winning. The likes of Rose, Purdy, Bellew, Barker (apologies if I have got any wrong- this is just off the top of my head).

He reconciles this by saying the boxer earned "life changing money" or "best ever purse".
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22335
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Has Hearn Ever Put One of His Fighters in With The Division Number One?

Post by Horse »

Barker vs Martinez.
Andrew
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 6108
Joined: 17 Jul 2012, 09:31

Re: Has Hearn Ever Put One of His Fighters in With The Division Number One?

Post by Andrew »

Happy Slapper wrote:Question is in the title. Froch fought Ward when he wasn't with Hearn, and so far hasn't had a rematch. Perhaps you could argue Bellew v Stevenson but I would say Kovalev was number one light heavy even when Bellew fought Stevenson.

Anyone think of any?
He was with Hearn. If I am not mistaken it was his first fight with Matchroom.

Post fight presser here he walks in with Eddie 18 minutes in.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r_Nd_yshhRE
Andrew
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 6108
Joined: 17 Jul 2012, 09:31

Re: Has Hearn Ever Put One of His Fighters in With The Division Number One?

Post by Andrew »

Whilst he was not proven at the time many posters felt Crawford was the best at lightweight when he fought Burns. I personally felt he was the best after the Beltran fight.

I certainly feel Broner was the best lightweight when Gavin Rees fought him.

Bellew fought Adonis Stevenson who is Lineal Light Heavyweight Champion.

Darren Barker fought Sergio Martinez lineal Middleweight Champion when he was promoted by Hearn.
whiskey
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11956
Joined: 27 Mar 2007, 14:52

Re: Has Hearn Ever Put One of His Fighters in With The Division Number One?

Post by whiskey »

Naandrew wrote:Whilst he was not proven at the time many posters felt Crawford was the best at lightweight when he fought Burns. I personally felt he was the best after the Beltran fight.

I certainly feel Broner was the best lightweight when Gavin Rees fought him.

Bellew fought Adonis Stevenson who is Lineal Light Heavyweight Champion.

Darren Barker fought Sergio Martinez lineal Middleweight Champion when he was promoted by Hearn.
Yep, and whilst Eddie has his critics he doesn't put a gun to his fighter's head and say "take this huge pile of cash in America".
Old Jack J
Middleweight
Posts: 1626
Joined: 24 Jan 2014, 16:34

Re: Has Hearn Ever Put One of His Fighters in With The Division Number One?

Post by Old Jack J »

bripez wrote:The boy Eddie is not averse to throwing his lads in away from home and against the odds - and I can't think of one example where this ended with his boxer winning. The likes of Rose, Purdy, Bellew, Barker (apologies if I have got any wrong- this is just off the top of my head).

He reconciles this by saying the boxer earned "life changing money" or "best ever purse".
What odds were kell brook vs shawn porter? Sure he was the first British underdog to win in the US for a long time.
Dan Dares
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1584
Joined: 29 Nov 2010, 16:33

Re: Has Hearn Ever Put One of His Fighters in With The Division Number One?

Post by Dan Dares »

Naandrew wrote:
He was with Hearn. If I am not mistaken it was his first fight with Matchroom.

Post fight presser here he walks in with Eddie 18 minutes in.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r_Nd_yshhRE
I think he was with Hearn for the fight before, Glen Johnson, but he was already in the super six and on a path to the Ward fight before he signed. Hearn certainly didn't make the fight.
Autobarn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16093
Joined: 05 Jul 2005, 13:01

Re: Has Hearn Ever Put One of His Fighters in With The Division Number One?

Post by Autobarn »

This is a really positive time for British wins away from home, in hard fights. Brook-porter, McDonnell-kameda, degale-dirrell. I can't think of this level of hard victories, in such a short period. Okay, none of them beat "the man" but all can advance to intriguing and profitable fights. If people aren't happy enough with this, fair enough. Beating international opposition on away promotions.

If it's ever going to happen (the Hatton-tszyu or haye-mormeck or calzaghe-hopkins calibre of victory) you'd think beating the #1 at the weight would progress from the level of success exhibited by brook, McDonnell and degale. Because they're doing things, responding to extra pressures and challenges, they perhaps weren't certain they could do.
rio
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1173
Joined: 22 Oct 2012, 16:48

Re: Has Hearn Ever Put One of His Fighters in With The Division Number One?

Post by rio »

Barker v martinez
Rees v broner
Burns v Crawford......although Crawford was mandatory so Hearn had no choice. As mention earlier froch v ward was the super 6 final so Hearn had nothing to do with that.
ALI
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2667
Joined: 27 Nov 2003, 14:10

Re: Has Hearn Ever Put One of His Fighters in With The Division Number One?

Post by ALI »

It should be taken into consideration Hearn only took up the reigns at Matchroom a few years back, he has proven in his short time as a promoter he is more than willing to put his fighters in against the odds, much more willing the our Fwank ever hss been. I might not like everything Hearn does, but there is no arguing he has been good for British boxing.
rossij8
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 1746
Joined: 16 Jul 2012, 08:06

Re: Has Hearn Ever Put One of His Fighters in With The Division Number One?

Post by rossij8 »

ALI wrote:It should be taken into consideration Hearn only took up the reigns at Matchroom a few years back, he has proven in his short time as a promoter he is more than willing to put his fighters in against the odds, much more willing the our Fwank ever hss been. I might not like everything Hearn does, but there is no arguing he has been good for British boxing.
Yes there is :box:
ALI
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2667
Joined: 27 Nov 2003, 14:10

Re: Has Hearn Ever Put One of His Fighters in With The Division Number One?

Post by ALI »

rossij8 wrote:
ALI wrote:It should be taken into consideration Hearn only took up the reigns at Matchroom a few years back, he has proven in his short time as a promoter he is more than willing to put his fighters in against the odds, much more willing the our Fwank ever hss been. I might not like everything Hearn does, but there is no arguing he has been good for British boxing.
Yes there is :box:
Go on then, what you got, too many under par PPV shows?
ashedward
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 420
Joined: 19 Apr 2009, 16:17

Re: Has Hearn Ever Put One of His Fighters in With The Division Number One?

Post by ashedward »

Smith in a couple of weeks also.
Autobarn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16093
Joined: 05 Jul 2005, 13:01

Re: Has Hearn Ever Put One of His Fighters in With The Division Number One?

Post by Autobarn »

I think ward is bound for light heavyweight, always have felt that way, so he won't be the division #1 at 168 anymore. He's very big and strong holding, hitting and headbutting inside - something a referee has yet to penalise.

Weird fight to match him with Smith a few pounds inside light heavyweight.

So it's possible degale challenging froch could fit the "vs #1" criteria, in time.
dbf
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1793
Joined: 28 Nov 2003, 11:06

Re: Has Hearn Ever Put One of His Fighters in With The Division Number One?

Post by dbf »

Autobarn wrote:I think ward is bound for light heavyweight, always have felt that way, so he won't be the division #1 at 168 anymore. He's very big and strong holding, hitting and headbutting inside - something a referee has yet to penalise.

Weird fight to match him with Smith a few pounds inside light heavyweight.

So it's possible degale challenging froch could fit the "vs #1" criteria, in time.
You don't post enough 'barn. Agree re; ward. Beating Kovalev will convince me he is a great fighter right now I'm not so sure. Smith fight just strange.
Bellew v Hernandez is that the best guy in the division?
Autobarn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16093
Joined: 05 Jul 2005, 13:01

Re: Has Hearn Ever Put One of His Fighters in With The Division Number One?

Post by Autobarn »

When smith was doing his best work and going into degale and groves fights, following superb fight with Dodson, an excellent trainer and very savvy guy said he'd put smith in with anyone - apart from ward!

Full credit he put in a fine showing almost beating Abraham to almost win a world crown.

I wish them all the best to his time, taking every chance, but it is one strange matchup, from both sides.

Ward not done too much after super 6 and due to size of him his true rivals should be Stevenson and kovalev.

Ward has the size and athletic advantages at 168 like rjj had at 160 in the early 90s. When the refs allow him to smother, hug and butt, he's taking liberties and gaining advantages. but, When you're that big you can't make that weight forever. You have to move up before getting sluggish at the weight.
gobbles
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2682
Joined: 18 Dec 2003, 15:04

Re: Has Hearn Ever Put One of His Fighters in With The Division Number One?

Post by gobbles »

Linares is surely No 1 lightweight. Better than Abril and Bey, who is a drugs cheat anyway
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: Has Hearn Ever Put One of His Fighters in With The Division Number One?

Post by crusader »

dbf wrote:
Autobarn wrote:I think ward is bound for light heavyweight, always have felt that way, so he won't be the division #1 at 168 anymore. He's very big and strong holding, hitting and headbutting inside - something a referee has yet to penalise.

Weird fight to match him with Smith a few pounds inside light heavyweight.

So it's possible degale challenging froch could fit the "vs #1" criteria, in time.
You don't post enough 'barn. Agree re; ward. Beating Kovalev will convince me he is a great fighter right now I'm not so sure. Smith fight just strange.
Bellew v Hernandez is that the best guy in the division?
I believe that Hernandez is the lineal champ, so many people will default 'top fighter in the division' to him because for some reason they believe that it's an unassailable rule that the lineal champ is the #1 while no other factors are relevant, but I don't think he's the best, he's clearly vulnerable, and I suspect that he'll lose within his next few fights, at least if he's facing good opponents.

That said, it's not clear-cut at CW and he's at least among the best.
Andrew
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 6108
Joined: 17 Jul 2012, 09:31

Re: Has Hearn Ever Put One of His Fighters in With The Division Number One?

Post by Andrew »

crusader wrote:
dbf wrote:
Autobarn wrote:I think ward is bound for light heavyweight, always have felt that way, so he won't be the division #1 at 168 anymore. He's very big and strong holding, hitting and headbutting inside - something a referee has yet to penalise.

Weird fight to match him with Smith a few pounds inside light heavyweight.

So it's possible degale challenging froch could fit the "vs #1" criteria, in time.
You don't post enough 'barn. Agree re; ward. Beating Kovalev will convince me he is a great fighter right now I'm not so sure. Smith fight just strange.
Bellew v Hernandez is that the best guy in the division?
I believe that Hernandez is the lineal champ, so many people will default 'top fighter in the division' to him because for some reason they believe that it's an unassailable rule that the lineal champ is the #1 while no other factors are relevant, but I don't think he's the best, he's clearly vulnerable, and I suspect that he'll lose within his next few fights, at least if he's facing good opponents.

That said, it's not clear-cut at CW and he's at least among the best.


Hernandez has to fight Victor Ramirez before Bellew. He is not sure to win that one IMO.
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: Has Hearn Ever Put One of His Fighters in With The Division Number One?

Post by crusader »

I agree.
Datsue
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Has Hearn Ever Put One of His Fighters in With The Division Number One?

Post by Datsue »

gobbles wrote:Linares is surely No 1 lightweight. Better than Abril and Bey, who is a drugs cheat anyway
Yep. I love that video where a reporter asks Floyd about the two positive tests of his fighters (Bey & J'Leon Love) in a couple of months & he spends two minutes spinning about "They didn't know what they were given/they were ill/it was a cabal of Space Vampires" & then Ellerbe has to step in & limit the damage by making noises about random drug testing & how failing any test is unacceptable. Hilarity.

But yeah, on-point, off that showing the other week I'd take Linares over anyone at lightweight atm. It was a poor division before Crawford moved up & since Beltran took too many roids to make weight for the vacant belt (http://espn.go.com/boxing/story/_/id/12 ... t-canceled) it looks positively empty.

On or off the gear, Bey is a desperately underwhelming fighter & no better than Vazquez imo, who though he holds the "Gangly Awkward Mexican Grudging Respect Raul "Jibaro" Perez Memorial Title", I'd rather eat my own sick than watch him fight.

Shame innit that such an historic division is almost a wasteland at the mo'. O tempora, O mores or something.
Autobarn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16093
Joined: 05 Jul 2005, 13:01

Re: Has Hearn Ever Put One of His Fighters in With The Division Number One?

Post by Autobarn »

Is bellow going to challenge Hernandez, not heard much since the bloated (in hype and surplus weight) revenge win over a subdued cleverly?

Hernandez and huck are about the same to me , both look knackered from gritty fights and getting their frames down to cruiserweight.
TheGman
Middleweight
Posts: 8964
Joined: 10 Oct 2013, 12:37

Re: Has Hearn Ever Put One of His Fighters in With The Division Number One?

Post by TheGman »

Happy Slapper wrote:Question is in the title. Froch fought Ward when he wasn't with Hearn, and so far hasn't had a rematch. Perhaps you could argue Bellew v Stevenson but I would say Kovalev was number one light heavy even when Bellew fought Stevenson.

Anyone think of any?
I think froch was with hearn but the question is would he have fought ward if he wasnt contracted to the super6? I think the records show that stevenson was the lhw no.1 at the time of the bellew fight.
Yes We Can
Cruiserweight
Posts: 2087
Joined: 29 Sep 2010, 17:16

Re: Has Hearn Ever Put One of His Fighters in With The Division Number One?

Post by Yes We Can »

Linares is not better than Abril, he is more exciting and that is it. Abril (although inactive) schooled a prime Brandon Rios.

Linares would be 50/50 against Vasquez.
Post Reply