Has Hearn Ever Put One of His Fighters in With The Division Number One?
-
Happy Slapper
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 499
- Joined: 20 Jul 2008, 16:22
Has Hearn Ever Put One of His Fighters in With The Division Number One?
Question is in the title. Froch fought Ward when he wasn't with Hearn, and so far hasn't had a rematch. Perhaps you could argue Bellew v Stevenson but I would say Kovalev was number one light heavy even when Bellew fought Stevenson.
Anyone think of any?
Anyone think of any?
Re: Has Hearn Ever Put One of His Fighters in With The Division Number One?
The boy Eddie is not averse to throwing his lads in away from home and against the odds - and I can't think of one example where this ended with his boxer winning. The likes of Rose, Purdy, Bellew, Barker (apologies if I have got any wrong- this is just off the top of my head).
He reconciles this by saying the boxer earned "life changing money" or "best ever purse".
He reconciles this by saying the boxer earned "life changing money" or "best ever purse".
Re: Has Hearn Ever Put One of His Fighters in With The Division Number One?
Barker vs Martinez.
Re: Has Hearn Ever Put One of His Fighters in With The Division Number One?
He was with Hearn. If I am not mistaken it was his first fight with Matchroom.Happy Slapper wrote:Question is in the title. Froch fought Ward when he wasn't with Hearn, and so far hasn't had a rematch. Perhaps you could argue Bellew v Stevenson but I would say Kovalev was number one light heavy even when Bellew fought Stevenson.
Anyone think of any?
Post fight presser here he walks in with Eddie 18 minutes in.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r_Nd_yshhRE
Re: Has Hearn Ever Put One of His Fighters in With The Division Number One?
Whilst he was not proven at the time many posters felt Crawford was the best at lightweight when he fought Burns. I personally felt he was the best after the Beltran fight.
I certainly feel Broner was the best lightweight when Gavin Rees fought him.
Bellew fought Adonis Stevenson who is Lineal Light Heavyweight Champion.
Darren Barker fought Sergio Martinez lineal Middleweight Champion when he was promoted by Hearn.
I certainly feel Broner was the best lightweight when Gavin Rees fought him.
Bellew fought Adonis Stevenson who is Lineal Light Heavyweight Champion.
Darren Barker fought Sergio Martinez lineal Middleweight Champion when he was promoted by Hearn.
Re: Has Hearn Ever Put One of His Fighters in With The Division Number One?
Yep, and whilst Eddie has his critics he doesn't put a gun to his fighter's head and say "take this huge pile of cash in America".Naandrew wrote:Whilst he was not proven at the time many posters felt Crawford was the best at lightweight when he fought Burns. I personally felt he was the best after the Beltran fight.
I certainly feel Broner was the best lightweight when Gavin Rees fought him.
Bellew fought Adonis Stevenson who is Lineal Light Heavyweight Champion.
Darren Barker fought Sergio Martinez lineal Middleweight Champion when he was promoted by Hearn.
-
Old Jack J
- Middleweight
- Posts: 1626
- Joined: 24 Jan 2014, 16:34
Re: Has Hearn Ever Put One of His Fighters in With The Division Number One?
What odds were kell brook vs shawn porter? Sure he was the first British underdog to win in the US for a long time.bripez wrote:The boy Eddie is not averse to throwing his lads in away from home and against the odds - and I can't think of one example where this ended with his boxer winning. The likes of Rose, Purdy, Bellew, Barker (apologies if I have got any wrong- this is just off the top of my head).
He reconciles this by saying the boxer earned "life changing money" or "best ever purse".
Re: Has Hearn Ever Put One of His Fighters in With The Division Number One?
I think he was with Hearn for the fight before, Glen Johnson, but he was already in the super six and on a path to the Ward fight before he signed. Hearn certainly didn't make the fight.Naandrew wrote:
He was with Hearn. If I am not mistaken it was his first fight with Matchroom.
Post fight presser here he walks in with Eddie 18 minutes in.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r_Nd_yshhRE
Re: Has Hearn Ever Put One of His Fighters in With The Division Number One?
This is a really positive time for British wins away from home, in hard fights. Brook-porter, McDonnell-kameda, degale-dirrell. I can't think of this level of hard victories, in such a short period. Okay, none of them beat "the man" but all can advance to intriguing and profitable fights. If people aren't happy enough with this, fair enough. Beating international opposition on away promotions.
If it's ever going to happen (the Hatton-tszyu or haye-mormeck or calzaghe-hopkins calibre of victory) you'd think beating the #1 at the weight would progress from the level of success exhibited by brook, McDonnell and degale. Because they're doing things, responding to extra pressures and challenges, they perhaps weren't certain they could do.
If it's ever going to happen (the Hatton-tszyu or haye-mormeck or calzaghe-hopkins calibre of victory) you'd think beating the #1 at the weight would progress from the level of success exhibited by brook, McDonnell and degale. Because they're doing things, responding to extra pressures and challenges, they perhaps weren't certain they could do.
Re: Has Hearn Ever Put One of His Fighters in With The Division Number One?
Barker v martinez
Rees v broner
Burns v Crawford......although Crawford was mandatory so Hearn had no choice. As mention earlier froch v ward was the super 6 final so Hearn had nothing to do with that.
Rees v broner
Burns v Crawford......although Crawford was mandatory so Hearn had no choice. As mention earlier froch v ward was the super 6 final so Hearn had nothing to do with that.
Re: Has Hearn Ever Put One of His Fighters in With The Division Number One?
It should be taken into consideration Hearn only took up the reigns at Matchroom a few years back, he has proven in his short time as a promoter he is more than willing to put his fighters in against the odds, much more willing the our Fwank ever hss been. I might not like everything Hearn does, but there is no arguing he has been good for British boxing.
Re: Has Hearn Ever Put One of His Fighters in With The Division Number One?
Yes there isALI wrote:It should be taken into consideration Hearn only took up the reigns at Matchroom a few years back, he has proven in his short time as a promoter he is more than willing to put his fighters in against the odds, much more willing the our Fwank ever hss been. I might not like everything Hearn does, but there is no arguing he has been good for British boxing.
Re: Has Hearn Ever Put One of His Fighters in With The Division Number One?
Go on then, what you got, too many under par PPV shows?rossij8 wrote:Yes there isALI wrote:It should be taken into consideration Hearn only took up the reigns at Matchroom a few years back, he has proven in his short time as a promoter he is more than willing to put his fighters in against the odds, much more willing the our Fwank ever hss been. I might not like everything Hearn does, but there is no arguing he has been good for British boxing.
Re: Has Hearn Ever Put One of His Fighters in With The Division Number One?
Smith in a couple of weeks also.
Re: Has Hearn Ever Put One of His Fighters in With The Division Number One?
I think ward is bound for light heavyweight, always have felt that way, so he won't be the division #1 at 168 anymore. He's very big and strong holding, hitting and headbutting inside - something a referee has yet to penalise.
Weird fight to match him with Smith a few pounds inside light heavyweight.
So it's possible degale challenging froch could fit the "vs #1" criteria, in time.
Weird fight to match him with Smith a few pounds inside light heavyweight.
So it's possible degale challenging froch could fit the "vs #1" criteria, in time.
Re: Has Hearn Ever Put One of His Fighters in With The Division Number One?
You don't post enough 'barn. Agree re; ward. Beating Kovalev will convince me he is a great fighter right now I'm not so sure. Smith fight just strange.Autobarn wrote:I think ward is bound for light heavyweight, always have felt that way, so he won't be the division #1 at 168 anymore. He's very big and strong holding, hitting and headbutting inside - something a referee has yet to penalise.
Weird fight to match him with Smith a few pounds inside light heavyweight.
So it's possible degale challenging froch could fit the "vs #1" criteria, in time.
Bellew v Hernandez is that the best guy in the division?
Re: Has Hearn Ever Put One of His Fighters in With The Division Number One?
When smith was doing his best work and going into degale and groves fights, following superb fight with Dodson, an excellent trainer and very savvy guy said he'd put smith in with anyone - apart from ward!
Full credit he put in a fine showing almost beating Abraham to almost win a world crown.
I wish them all the best to his time, taking every chance, but it is one strange matchup, from both sides.
Ward not done too much after super 6 and due to size of him his true rivals should be Stevenson and kovalev.
Ward has the size and athletic advantages at 168 like rjj had at 160 in the early 90s. When the refs allow him to smother, hug and butt, he's taking liberties and gaining advantages. but, When you're that big you can't make that weight forever. You have to move up before getting sluggish at the weight.
Full credit he put in a fine showing almost beating Abraham to almost win a world crown.
I wish them all the best to his time, taking every chance, but it is one strange matchup, from both sides.
Ward not done too much after super 6 and due to size of him his true rivals should be Stevenson and kovalev.
Ward has the size and athletic advantages at 168 like rjj had at 160 in the early 90s. When the refs allow him to smother, hug and butt, he's taking liberties and gaining advantages. but, When you're that big you can't make that weight forever. You have to move up before getting sluggish at the weight.
Re: Has Hearn Ever Put One of His Fighters in With The Division Number One?
Linares is surely No 1 lightweight. Better than Abril and Bey, who is a drugs cheat anyway
Re: Has Hearn Ever Put One of His Fighters in With The Division Number One?
I believe that Hernandez is the lineal champ, so many people will default 'top fighter in the division' to him because for some reason they believe that it's an unassailable rule that the lineal champ is the #1 while no other factors are relevant, but I don't think he's the best, he's clearly vulnerable, and I suspect that he'll lose within his next few fights, at least if he's facing good opponents.dbf wrote:You don't post enough 'barn. Agree re; ward. Beating Kovalev will convince me he is a great fighter right now I'm not so sure. Smith fight just strange.Autobarn wrote:I think ward is bound for light heavyweight, always have felt that way, so he won't be the division #1 at 168 anymore. He's very big and strong holding, hitting and headbutting inside - something a referee has yet to penalise.
Weird fight to match him with Smith a few pounds inside light heavyweight.
So it's possible degale challenging froch could fit the "vs #1" criteria, in time.
Bellew v Hernandez is that the best guy in the division?
That said, it's not clear-cut at CW and he's at least among the best.
Re: Has Hearn Ever Put One of His Fighters in With The Division Number One?
crusader wrote:I believe that Hernandez is the lineal champ, so many people will default 'top fighter in the division' to him because for some reason they believe that it's an unassailable rule that the lineal champ is the #1 while no other factors are relevant, but I don't think he's the best, he's clearly vulnerable, and I suspect that he'll lose within his next few fights, at least if he's facing good opponents.dbf wrote:You don't post enough 'barn. Agree re; ward. Beating Kovalev will convince me he is a great fighter right now I'm not so sure. Smith fight just strange.Autobarn wrote:I think ward is bound for light heavyweight, always have felt that way, so he won't be the division #1 at 168 anymore. He's very big and strong holding, hitting and headbutting inside - something a referee has yet to penalise.
Weird fight to match him with Smith a few pounds inside light heavyweight.
So it's possible degale challenging froch could fit the "vs #1" criteria, in time.
Bellew v Hernandez is that the best guy in the division?
That said, it's not clear-cut at CW and he's at least among the best.
Hernandez has to fight Victor Ramirez before Bellew. He is not sure to win that one IMO.
-
Datsue
- Heavyweight

Re: Has Hearn Ever Put One of His Fighters in With The Division Number One?
Yep. I love that video where a reporter asks Floyd about the two positive tests of his fighters (Bey & J'Leon Love) in a couple of months & he spends two minutes spinning about "They didn't know what they were given/they were ill/it was a cabal of Space Vampires" & then Ellerbe has to step in & limit the damage by making noises about random drug testing & how failing any test is unacceptable. Hilarity.gobbles wrote:Linares is surely No 1 lightweight. Better than Abril and Bey, who is a drugs cheat anyway
But yeah, on-point, off that showing the other week I'd take Linares over anyone at lightweight atm. It was a poor division before Crawford moved up & since Beltran took too many roids to make weight for the vacant belt (http://espn.go.com/boxing/story/_/id/12 ... t-canceled) it looks positively empty.
On or off the gear, Bey is a desperately underwhelming fighter & no better than Vazquez imo, who though he holds the "Gangly Awkward Mexican Grudging Respect Raul "Jibaro" Perez Memorial Title", I'd rather eat my own sick than watch him fight.
Shame innit that such an historic division is almost a wasteland at the mo'. O tempora, O mores or something.
Re: Has Hearn Ever Put One of His Fighters in With The Division Number One?
Is bellow going to challenge Hernandez, not heard much since the bloated (in hype and surplus weight) revenge win over a subdued cleverly?
Hernandez and huck are about the same to me , both look knackered from gritty fights and getting their frames down to cruiserweight.
Hernandez and huck are about the same to me , both look knackered from gritty fights and getting their frames down to cruiserweight.
Re: Has Hearn Ever Put One of His Fighters in With The Division Number One?
I think froch was with hearn but the question is would he have fought ward if he wasnt contracted to the super6? I think the records show that stevenson was the lhw no.1 at the time of the bellew fight.Happy Slapper wrote:Question is in the title. Froch fought Ward when he wasn't with Hearn, and so far hasn't had a rematch. Perhaps you could argue Bellew v Stevenson but I would say Kovalev was number one light heavy even when Bellew fought Stevenson.
Anyone think of any?
-
Yes We Can
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 2087
- Joined: 29 Sep 2010, 17:16
Re: Has Hearn Ever Put One of His Fighters in With The Division Number One?
Linares is not better than Abril, he is more exciting and that is it. Abril (although inactive) schooled a prime Brandon Rios.
Linares would be 50/50 against Vasquez.
Linares would be 50/50 against Vasquez.