Brook v Rios

Andrew
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 6108
Joined: 17 Jul 2012, 09:31

Re: Brook v Rios

Post by Andrew »

crusader wrote:Apparently Top Rank is still considering making Rios-Provo instead, a fight which I prefer to Rios-Brook.
Quoted here that it won't be http://www.boxingnews24.com/2015/06/aru ... r-fighter/

Would be a grewsome fight though.
Andrew
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 6108
Joined: 17 Jul 2012, 09:31

Re: Brook v Rios

Post by Andrew »

Counter-puncher wrote:
thechump wrote:
sweetscience wrote:wont tell us anything

he needs to fight ANOTHER genuine World Class Welter

fighting only 1 aint good enough

its beginning to annoy me again like it did prior to Porter... it annoys me cause he is good enough to fight the best
Rios is a tough man,never stops coming and i wouldnt be surprised if rios beat brook,id put my money on rios if this fight happened but i wont b paying ppv prices for the fight
For dogs sakes plead don't waste your money betting on Rios.

Brook will fvcking mallet him.
IMO brook doesn't lose a round unless he does something stupid.
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: Brook v Rios

Post by crusader »

Naandrew wrote:
crusader wrote:Apparently Top Rank is still considering making Rios-Provo instead, a fight which I prefer to Rios-Brook.
Quoted here that it won't be http://www.boxingnews24.com/2015/06/aru ... r-fighter/

Would be a grewsome fight though.
Dan Rafael was at Arum's house on Friday and said that Provo is still being considered, so I'm not sure what to think. I wonder what type of money Rios would be getting paid to fight Brook, because I think his chances of winning that are much lower than his chances of beating Provo. On the other hand, even if he loses to Brook I can still see there being significant appeal in Rios-Provo, whereas I don't think the reverse is true, and perhaps that's what's meant by Rios-Provo being a 'down the line' fight.
TJ77
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1352
Joined: 19 Sep 2010, 13:01

Re: Brook v Rios

Post by TJ77 »

nitro5912 wrote:This is one of the names khan mentions that kell should beat before he will think about a fight.

So let brook beat him, then offer khan the fight, when he bottles it, I'd then go after Garcia and beat him and basically force khan to fight whilst he is praying for floyd to set him up.
Good post :TU:
freddydoesdallas
Cruiserweight
Posts: 9436
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 13:48

Re: Brook v Rios

Post by freddydoesdallas »

It's a good fight IF mayweather was being truthful about fighting berto or Mayfield in September as it will put huge pressure on khan to pick a good opponent next time out.

If mayweather is honest then we are heading for brook khan next year as it's Khan's only big fight left as an 'a' side
SNG
Super Middleweight
Posts: 4703
Joined: 22 May 2013, 21:02

Re: Brook v Rios

Post by SNG »

Strange one this, Brook fans will tell you Khan is nobody in the division, doesn't deserve the fight with floyd, Khan hasn't beaten any proper welterweights, isn't a big name anymore, terrible chin, easy nights for brook etc yet they beg for the fight. Does no one else find that odd?
Andrew
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 6108
Joined: 17 Jul 2012, 09:31

Re: Brook v Rios

Post by Andrew »

crusader wrote:
Naandrew wrote:
crusader wrote:Apparently Top Rank is still considering making Rios-Provo instead, a fight which I prefer to Rios-Brook.
Quoted here that it won't be http://www.boxingnews24.com/2015/06/aru ... r-fighter/

Would be a grewsome fight though.
Dan Rafael was at Arum's house on Friday and said that Provo is still being considered, so I'm not sure what to think. I wonder what type of money Rios would be getting paid to fight Brook, because I think his chances of winning that are much lower than his chances of beating Provo. On the other hand, even if he loses to Brook I can still see there being significant appeal in Rios-Provo, whereas I don't think the reverse is true, and perhaps that's what's meant by Rios-Provo being a 'down the line' fight.
Put it on another thread about Rios purse for this fight. Going off what he has been paid in the past will be between £500-600k at minimum.
Counter-puncher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 39141
Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41

Re: Brook v Rios

Post by Counter-puncher »

SNG wrote:Strange one this, Brook fans will tell you Khan is nobody in the division, doesn't deserve the fight with floyd, Khan hasn't beaten any proper welterweights, isn't a big name anymore, terrible chin, easy nights for brook etc yet they beg for the fight. Does no one else find that odd?
If I was brooks team I would be pushing for a khan fight too.

Good payday, very much manageable risk.
SNG
Super Middleweight
Posts: 4703
Joined: 22 May 2013, 21:02

Re: Brook v Rios

Post by SNG »

Counter-puncher wrote:
SNG wrote:Strange one this, Brook fans will tell you Khan is nobody in the division, doesn't deserve the fight with floyd, Khan hasn't beaten any proper welterweights, isn't a big name anymore, terrible chin, easy nights for brook etc yet they beg for the fight. Does no one else find that odd?
If I was brooks team I would be pushing for a khan fight too.

Good payday, very much manageable risk.
They shouldn't be slating Khan for doing the same thing then.
Counter-puncher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 39141
Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41

Re: Brook v Rios

Post by Counter-puncher »

Don't you just switch off when you see boxing fans double standards nowadays? Good god man you've been posting on here long enough surely? ;;-)
SNG
Super Middleweight
Posts: 4703
Joined: 22 May 2013, 21:02

Re: Brook v Rios

Post by SNG »

Fair point, it just bugged me this morning, or afternoon I should say. I'll put it down the stinking hangover I've got.
Boxerbeetle
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 32987
Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59

Re: Brook v Rios

Post by Boxerbeetle »

Terry Dooley wrote:It's the either/or thing. You can't support one fighter without "hating" another. There's probably a cracking flowchart to be made if someone can be arsed doing it.
Great idea. If I run short of work this afternoon I'll make a start on the definitive decision tree for boxing fans.
freddydoesdallas
Cruiserweight
Posts: 9436
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 13:48

Re: Brook v Rios

Post by freddydoesdallas »

Terry Dooley wrote:It's the either/or thing. You can't support one fighter without "hating" another. There's probably a cracking flowchart to be made if someone can be arsed doing it.

Or you could just go with:

"I like A."

"A is poo."

Repeat across any topic you can imagine.
what about the people who just think everyone is a pudendum?
Boxerbeetle
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 32987
Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59

Re: Brook v Rios

Post by Boxerbeetle »

freddydoesdallas wrote:
Terry Dooley wrote:It's the either/or thing. You can't support one fighter without "hating" another. There's probably a cracking flowchart to be made if someone can be arsed doing it.

Or you could just go with:

"I like A."

"A is poo."

Repeat across any topic you can imagine.
what about the people who just think everyone is a pudendum?
That's branch one of the decision tree:

"Do you actually like any boxers and/or boxing?"
-
If No
-
Call them a bum
-
Process complete.
keithmoonhangover
Cruiserweight
Posts: 17134
Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42

Re: Brook v Rios

Post by keithmoonhangover »

sweetscience wrote:wont tell us anything

he needs to fight ANOTHER genuine World Class Welter

fighting only 1 aint good enough

its beginning to annoy me again like it did prior to Porter... it annoys me cause he is good enough to fight the best
It isn't as easy as Brook clicking his fingers and getting a top fighter. Most of them are unavailable, have fights scheduled or don't want to fight him.
sweetscience
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2816
Joined: 22 Sep 2004, 09:09

Re: Brook v Rios

Post by sweetscience »

keithmoonhangover wrote:
sweetscience wrote:wont tell us anything

he needs to fight ANOTHER genuine World Class Welter

fighting only 1 aint good enough

its beginning to annoy me again like it did prior to Porter... it annoys me cause he is good enough to fight the best
It isn't as easy as Brook clicking his fingers and getting a top fighter. Most of them are unavailable, have fights scheduled or don't want to fight him.
Clicking your fingers takes seconds ... Not 18 months
Shirow
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1719
Joined: 29 Nov 2003, 11:15

Re: Brook v Rios

Post by Shirow »

Rios isn't bad and when he could drain himself down to lightweight but still perform he really was world class. He doesn't get hit much at all once he gets inside either.

Technically he's better than Porter but Porter is a much bigger, stronger and more athletic pressure fighter. We've seen Brook deal with that so we know he'll be able to deal with Rios. That's the reason this is a disappointment. The only upside would be that if he stopped him it could be favourably compared to Pacman's performance.

Even an elderly and small Marquez would give me more possibilities to ponder and make this feel ppv worthy.
sweetscience
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2816
Joined: 22 Sep 2004, 09:09

Re: Brook v Rios

Post by sweetscience »

I can't see this happening in UK .. Rios will want to get paid ... Matchroom are not big spenders
Finn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5509
Joined: 07 May 2009, 15:56

Re: Brook v Rios

Post by Finn »

Surprised this fight is getting so much negativity. Bam Bam is a good opponent and big name. If brook destroys him i'll be impressed.
Andrew
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 6108
Joined: 17 Jul 2012, 09:31

Re: Brook v Rios

Post by Andrew »

Sounds like this fight may be off

http://www.BS.com/brandon-rios ... ing--93158
ThereByTheGrace
Cruiserweight
Posts: 4016
Joined: 04 Sep 2010, 05:22

Re: Brook v Rios

Post by ThereByTheGrace »

Has Hearn actually organized a high profile competitive fight this year, or is he still piggy backing om other peoples shows and making mismatches that nobody cares about! He's failed the boxing public this year no doubt!
freddydoesdallas
Cruiserweight
Posts: 9436
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 13:48

Re: Brook v Rios

Post by freddydoesdallas »

ThereByTheGrace wrote:Has Hearn actually organized a high profile competitive fight this year, or is he still piggy backing om other peoples shows and making mismatches that nobody cares about! He's failed the boxing public this year no doubt!
Maybe so but for some reason people keep shelling out for his ppv
ashedward
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 420
Joined: 19 Apr 2009, 16:17

Re: Brook v Rios

Post by ashedward »

ThereByTheGrace wrote:Has Hearn actually organized a high profile competitive fight this year, or is he still piggy backing om other peoples shows and making mismatches that nobody cares about! He's failed the boxing public this year no doubt!

I`m not sure he has,Mitchell-Linares was good and for a title but was it high profile enough,it was part of a quality show imo but lacked a genuine ppv main event but the show would of been £17 of my money on box office if I didn`t attend it and was well worth £80 live plus Selby beat a champion coming over on that show.The July 18th card is quality 2 british title fights one world title fight and Quigg-Martniez which is a quality fight which is pretty high profile imo but he has made any huge fights like Froch-Bute or Froch-Groves this year but who has in this country.He has only put on 3 shows out of 8 which I would deem as acceptable this year on normal sky so he does have to do allot better imo.
ashedward
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 420
Joined: 19 Apr 2009, 16:17

Re: Brook v Rios

Post by ashedward »

ashedward wrote:
ThereByTheGrace wrote:Has Hearn actually organized a high profile competitive fight this year, or is he still piggy backing om other peoples shows and making mismatches that nobody cares about! He's failed the boxing public this year no doubt!

I`m not sure he has,Mitchell-Linares was good and for a title but was it high profile enough,it was part of a quality show imo but lacked a genuine ppv main event but the show would of been worth £17 of my money on box office if I didn`t attend it and was well worth £80 live plus Selby beat a champion coming over on that show.The July 18th card is quality 2 british title fights one world title fight and Quigg-Martniez which is a quality fight which is pretty high profile imo but he has made any huge fights like Froch-Bute or Froch-Groves this year but who has in this country.He has only put on 3 shows out of 8 which I would deem as acceptable this year on normal sky so he does have to do allot better imo.
rossco1111
Super Middleweight
Posts: 4
Joined: 28 Nov 2012, 02:08

Re: Brook v Rios

Post by rossco1111 »

rios is in a good position. he pulls out the paper views off. He can command a kings ransom and if not no probs he got options in the US. If brook fights 3 easy touches this year its very dissapointing and he will have lost great momentum after porter
Post Reply