Quoted here that it won't be http://www.boxingnews24.com/2015/06/aru ... r-fighter/crusader wrote:Apparently Top Rank is still considering making Rios-Provo instead, a fight which I prefer to Rios-Brook.
Would be a grewsome fight though.
Quoted here that it won't be http://www.boxingnews24.com/2015/06/aru ... r-fighter/crusader wrote:Apparently Top Rank is still considering making Rios-Provo instead, a fight which I prefer to Rios-Brook.
IMO brook doesn't lose a round unless he does something stupid.Counter-puncher wrote:For dogs sakes plead don't waste your money betting on Rios.thechump wrote:Rios is a tough man,never stops coming and i wouldnt be surprised if rios beat brook,id put my money on rios if this fight happened but i wont b paying ppv prices for the fightsweetscience wrote:wont tell us anything
he needs to fight ANOTHER genuine World Class Welter
fighting only 1 aint good enough
its beginning to annoy me again like it did prior to Porter... it annoys me cause he is good enough to fight the best
Brook will fvcking mallet him.
Dan Rafael was at Arum's house on Friday and said that Provo is still being considered, so I'm not sure what to think. I wonder what type of money Rios would be getting paid to fight Brook, because I think his chances of winning that are much lower than his chances of beating Provo. On the other hand, even if he loses to Brook I can still see there being significant appeal in Rios-Provo, whereas I don't think the reverse is true, and perhaps that's what's meant by Rios-Provo being a 'down the line' fight.Naandrew wrote:Quoted here that it won't be http://www.boxingnews24.com/2015/06/aru ... r-fighter/crusader wrote:Apparently Top Rank is still considering making Rios-Provo instead, a fight which I prefer to Rios-Brook.
Would be a grewsome fight though.
Good postnitro5912 wrote:This is one of the names khan mentions that kell should beat before he will think about a fight.
So let brook beat him, then offer khan the fight, when he bottles it, I'd then go after Garcia and beat him and basically force khan to fight whilst he is praying for floyd to set him up.
Put it on another thread about Rios purse for this fight. Going off what he has been paid in the past will be between £500-600k at minimum.crusader wrote:Dan Rafael was at Arum's house on Friday and said that Provo is still being considered, so I'm not sure what to think. I wonder what type of money Rios would be getting paid to fight Brook, because I think his chances of winning that are much lower than his chances of beating Provo. On the other hand, even if he loses to Brook I can still see there being significant appeal in Rios-Provo, whereas I don't think the reverse is true, and perhaps that's what's meant by Rios-Provo being a 'down the line' fight.Naandrew wrote:Quoted here that it won't be http://www.boxingnews24.com/2015/06/aru ... r-fighter/crusader wrote:Apparently Top Rank is still considering making Rios-Provo instead, a fight which I prefer to Rios-Brook.
Would be a grewsome fight though.
If I was brooks team I would be pushing for a khan fight too.SNG wrote:Strange one this, Brook fans will tell you Khan is nobody in the division, doesn't deserve the fight with floyd, Khan hasn't beaten any proper welterweights, isn't a big name anymore, terrible chin, easy nights for brook etc yet they beg for the fight. Does no one else find that odd?
They shouldn't be slating Khan for doing the same thing then.Counter-puncher wrote:If I was brooks team I would be pushing for a khan fight too.SNG wrote:Strange one this, Brook fans will tell you Khan is nobody in the division, doesn't deserve the fight with floyd, Khan hasn't beaten any proper welterweights, isn't a big name anymore, terrible chin, easy nights for brook etc yet they beg for the fight. Does no one else find that odd?
Good payday, very much manageable risk.
Great idea. If I run short of work this afternoon I'll make a start on the definitive decision tree for boxing fans.Terry Dooley wrote:It's the either/or thing. You can't support one fighter without "hating" another. There's probably a cracking flowchart to be made if someone can be arsed doing it.
what about the people who just think everyone is a pudendum?Terry Dooley wrote:It's the either/or thing. You can't support one fighter without "hating" another. There's probably a cracking flowchart to be made if someone can be arsed doing it.
Or you could just go with:
"I like A."
"A is poo."
Repeat across any topic you can imagine.
That's branch one of the decision tree:freddydoesdallas wrote:what about the people who just think everyone is a pudendum?Terry Dooley wrote:It's the either/or thing. You can't support one fighter without "hating" another. There's probably a cracking flowchart to be made if someone can be arsed doing it.
Or you could just go with:
"I like A."
"A is poo."
Repeat across any topic you can imagine.
It isn't as easy as Brook clicking his fingers and getting a top fighter. Most of them are unavailable, have fights scheduled or don't want to fight him.sweetscience wrote:wont tell us anything
he needs to fight ANOTHER genuine World Class Welter
fighting only 1 aint good enough
its beginning to annoy me again like it did prior to Porter... it annoys me cause he is good enough to fight the best
Clicking your fingers takes seconds ... Not 18 monthskeithmoonhangover wrote:It isn't as easy as Brook clicking his fingers and getting a top fighter. Most of them are unavailable, have fights scheduled or don't want to fight him.sweetscience wrote:wont tell us anything
he needs to fight ANOTHER genuine World Class Welter
fighting only 1 aint good enough
its beginning to annoy me again like it did prior to Porter... it annoys me cause he is good enough to fight the best
Maybe so but for some reason people keep shelling out for his ppvThereByTheGrace wrote:Has Hearn actually organized a high profile competitive fight this year, or is he still piggy backing om other peoples shows and making mismatches that nobody cares about! He's failed the boxing public this year no doubt!
ThereByTheGrace wrote:Has Hearn actually organized a high profile competitive fight this year, or is he still piggy backing om other peoples shows and making mismatches that nobody cares about! He's failed the boxing public this year no doubt!
ashedward wrote:ThereByTheGrace wrote:Has Hearn actually organized a high profile competitive fight this year, or is he still piggy backing om other peoples shows and making mismatches that nobody cares about! He's failed the boxing public this year no doubt!
I`m not sure he has,Mitchell-Linares was good and for a title but was it high profile enough,it was part of a quality show imo but lacked a genuine ppv main event but the show would of been worth £17 of my money on box office if I didn`t attend it and was well worth £80 live plus Selby beat a champion coming over on that show.The July 18th card is quality 2 british title fights one world title fight and Quigg-Martniez which is a quality fight which is pretty high profile imo but he has made any huge fights like Froch-Bute or Froch-Groves this year but who has in this country.He has only put on 3 shows out of 8 which I would deem as acceptable this year on normal sky so he does have to do allot better imo.