andre ward still not rated by THE RING. WTF ? *
-
dickbelden
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 767
- Joined: 07 Aug 2004, 20:45
Re: andre ward still not rated by THE RING. WTF ? *
Have they updated their ratings since his fight?
-
Freedom2013
- Super Middleweight
- Posts: 3879
- Joined: 26 Nov 2012, 11:35
Re: andre ward still not rated by THE RING. WTF ? *
He didn't fight at 168, and hasn't fought at that weight for nearly two years.
He fought at light heavyweight, but his opponent wasn't really good enough for him to be included in the 175 rankings.
He fought at light heavyweight, but his opponent wasn't really good enough for him to be included in the 175 rankings.
-
hurricanemitch14
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 828
- Joined: 13 Apr 2004, 02:35
Re: andre ward still not rated by THE RING. WTF ? *
His opponent was good enough for u Euros when AA fought against him. Haters can play games and leave him out. Wont change the fact that he'll dominate his opponents just like old times.
Froch,Kessler and AA combined won about 4 rds.
Froch,Kessler and AA combined won about 4 rds.
-
punchoutsb
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 5842
- Joined: 16 Sep 2009, 01:05
Re: andre ward still not rated by THE RING. WTF ? *
Canada isn't in Europe.hurricanemitch14 wrote:His opponent was good enough for u Euros when AA fought against him. Haters can play games and leave him out. Wont change the fact that he'll dominate his opponents just like old times.
Froch,Kessler and AA combined won about 4 rds.
-
hurricanemitch14
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 828
- Joined: 13 Apr 2004, 02:35
Re: andre ward still not rated by THE RING. WTF ? *
Well l'll add Canada with Europe as haters lol
-
punchoutsb
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 5842
- Joined: 16 Sep 2009, 01:05
Re: andre ward still not rated by THE RING. WTF ? *
I haven't seen any hate in this thread.
-
hurricanemitch14
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 828
- Joined: 13 Apr 2004, 02:35
Re: andre ward still not rated by THE RING. WTF ? *
Nah no hate but its a new thread.....give em time.
-
punchoutsb
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 5842
- Joined: 16 Sep 2009, 01:05
Re: andre ward still not rated by THE RING. WTF ? *
Ah gotcha. Preemptive hater hate so to speak.
-
hurricanemitch14
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 828
- Joined: 13 Apr 2004, 02:35
Re: andre ward still not rated by THE RING. WTF ? *
lol yep...gettn outta the way
Re: andre ward still not rated by THE RING. WTF ? *
I actually already see anti-European hate in this thread:hurricanemitch14 wrote:Nah no hate but its a new thread.....give em time.
According to 2 out of 3 judges in NJ, Froch alone won 5 rounds.Froch,Kessler and AA combined won about 4 rds.
Last edited by ikorolev on 06 Jul 2015, 01:04, edited 1 time in total.
Re: andre ward still not rated by THE RING. WTF ? *
Froch didn't win 5 rounds though, that's pure fantasy and horrible scoring
-
tiny_acres
- Middleweight
- Posts: 9468
- Joined: 17 Feb 2014, 14:43
Re: andre ward still not rated by THE RING. WTF ? *
That is the truth.I could not find 5 rounds if I had toSFW wrote:Froch didn't win 5 rounds though, that's pure fantasy and horrible scoring
-
hurricanemitch14
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 828
- Joined: 13 Apr 2004, 02:35
Re: andre ward still not rated by THE RING. WTF ? *
Im not hating on Euros.....i do remember all the talk about AA and Paul Smith back when they fought. Goin back n forth over who won. I didnt watch either fight so i dont know who should have won. I do remember everyone being cool with AA defending his title against Smith not once but twice. I point out Euros bc i know Americans dont care about AA.ikorolev wrote:I actually already see anti-European hate in this thread:hurricanemitch14 wrote:Nah no hate but its a new thread.....give em time.According to 2 out of 3 judges in NJ, Froch alone won 5 rounds.Froch,Kessler and AA combined won about 4 rds.
Re: andre ward still not rated by THE RING. WTF ? *
Right, where should he be ranked after not fighting at 168 for two years and fighting at 175 against a fighter never ranked there?hurricanemitch14 wrote:His opponent was good enough for u Euros when AA fought against him. Haters can play games and leave him out. Wont change the fact that he'll dominate his opponents just like old times.
Froch,Kessler and AA combined won about 4 rds.
-
hurricanemitch14
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 828
- Joined: 13 Apr 2004, 02:35
Re: andre ward still not rated by THE RING. WTF ? *
I think common sense applies. Hes either 1 or 2 at 175 and 1 at 168. Pick one...... I bet Mikey Garcia dont have to go thru this shit when he comes back.
Re: andre ward still not rated by THE RING. WTF ? *
No way he is #1 or even #2 at 175 until he actually beats some top 10 light heavies.
-
hurricanemitch14
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 828
- Joined: 13 Apr 2004, 02:35
Re: andre ward still not rated by THE RING. WTF ? *
Yea ok GGG is the G.O.A.T......ikorolev.
-
Bard of Boxrec
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 13113
- Joined: 22 Feb 2002, 20:00
Re: andre ward still not rated by THE RING. WTF ? *
Hmmm. I don't. But even if they were, why on earth would people hold a shot Abraham to the same standards as Ward?hurricanemitch14 wrote: I do remember everyone being cool with AA defending his title against Smith not once but twice.
-
world ranked
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 2199
- Joined: 21 Jan 2008, 14:21
Re: andre ward still not rated by THE RING. WTF ? *
Where would they rank him and then does Smith win warrant a ranking at 175. Typical case of resume vs eyes.Riddick Blowe wrote:Hmmm. I don't. But even if they were, why on earth would people hold a shot Abraham to the same standards as Ward?hurricanemitch14 wrote: I do remember everyone being cool with AA defending his title against Smith not once but twice.
Re: andre ward still not rated by THE RING. WTF ? *
Smith was widely considered a soft choice for AA and I think it's generally recognized that AA's been fighting a lot of weak opponents for a while now---I don't think there was as much of an uproar because people simply don't take him as seriously and therefore don't care as much about his opposition. I mean, why the hell should people hold AA and a P4P elite fighter like Ward to the same standards?hurricanemitch14 wrote:Im not hating on Euros.....i do remember all the talk about AA and Paul Smith back when they fought. Goin back n forth over who won. I didnt watch either fight so i dont know who should have won. I do remember everyone being cool with AA defending his title against Smith not once but twice. I point out Euros bc i know Americans dont care about AA.ikorolev wrote:I actually already see anti-European hate in this thread:hurricanemitch14 wrote:Nah no hate but its a new thread.....give em time.According to 2 out of 3 judges in NJ, Froch alone won 5 rounds.Froch,Kessler and AA combined won about 4 rds.
Ward is definitely given a hard time by some people, but you cry Euro too much.
Re: andre ward still not rated by THE RING. WTF ? *
What does it have to do with GGG ?hurricanemitch14 wrote:Yea ok GGG is the G.O.A.T......ikorolev.
Re: andre ward still not rated by THE RING. WTF ? *
I want what Hurricane Mitch is on.
Reality can be so irksome.
Reality can be so irksome.
-
hurricanemitch14
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 828
- Joined: 13 Apr 2004, 02:35
Re: andre ward still not rated by THE RING. WTF ? *
I dont think its crazy to rank Andre Ward at either 175 or 168 when we know hes p4p top 5. To leave him out of the top 10 is retarded now that he has fought.
Re: andre ward still not rated by THE RING. WTF ? *
Ward being really good at 168 doesn't automatically mean success at 175. At the lower weight, beside having advantage in hand speed, footwork, head movement, etc. over fighters like Froch, Kessler, Abraham, he also dominated them in clinching/wrestling competitions tiring them and not allowing to land anything significant. He will certainly not be able to do that against Beterbiev or other strong LHWs, so he still needs to prove that he belongs to LHW elite.