andre ward still not rated by THE RING. WTF ? *

dickbelden
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 767
Joined: 07 Aug 2004, 20:45

andre ward still not rated by THE RING. WTF ? *

Post by dickbelden »

*
Taansend
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11894
Joined: 10 Jul 2004, 17:38

Re: andre ward still not rated by THE RING. WTF ? *

Post by Taansend »

Have they updated their ratings since his fight?
Freedom2013
Super Middleweight
Posts: 3879
Joined: 26 Nov 2012, 11:35

Re: andre ward still not rated by THE RING. WTF ? *

Post by Freedom2013 »

He didn't fight at 168, and hasn't fought at that weight for nearly two years.

He fought at light heavyweight, but his opponent wasn't really good enough for him to be included in the 175 rankings.
hurricanemitch14
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 828
Joined: 13 Apr 2004, 02:35

Re: andre ward still not rated by THE RING. WTF ? *

Post by hurricanemitch14 »

His opponent was good enough for u Euros when AA fought against him. Haters can play games and leave him out. Wont change the fact that he'll dominate his opponents just like old times.

Froch,Kessler and AA combined won about 4 rds.
punchoutsb
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5842
Joined: 16 Sep 2009, 01:05

Re: andre ward still not rated by THE RING. WTF ? *

Post by punchoutsb »

hurricanemitch14 wrote:His opponent was good enough for u Euros when AA fought against him. Haters can play games and leave him out. Wont change the fact that he'll dominate his opponents just like old times.

Froch,Kessler and AA combined won about 4 rds.
Canada isn't in Europe.
hurricanemitch14
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 828
Joined: 13 Apr 2004, 02:35

Re: andre ward still not rated by THE RING. WTF ? *

Post by hurricanemitch14 »

Well l'll add Canada with Europe as haters lol
punchoutsb
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5842
Joined: 16 Sep 2009, 01:05

Re: andre ward still not rated by THE RING. WTF ? *

Post by punchoutsb »

I haven't seen any hate in this thread.
hurricanemitch14
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 828
Joined: 13 Apr 2004, 02:35

Re: andre ward still not rated by THE RING. WTF ? *

Post by hurricanemitch14 »

Nah no hate but its a new thread.....give em time.
punchoutsb
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5842
Joined: 16 Sep 2009, 01:05

Re: andre ward still not rated by THE RING. WTF ? *

Post by punchoutsb »

Ah gotcha. Preemptive hater hate so to speak.
hurricanemitch14
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 828
Joined: 13 Apr 2004, 02:35

Re: andre ward still not rated by THE RING. WTF ? *

Post by hurricanemitch14 »

lol yep...gettn outta the way
ikorolev
Middleweight
Posts: 4895
Joined: 21 Sep 2013, 19:08

Re: andre ward still not rated by THE RING. WTF ? *

Post by ikorolev »

hurricanemitch14 wrote:Nah no hate but its a new thread.....give em time.
I actually already see anti-European hate in this thread:
Froch,Kessler and AA combined won about 4 rds.
According to 2 out of 3 judges in NJ, Froch alone won 5 rounds.
Last edited by ikorolev on 06 Jul 2015, 01:04, edited 1 time in total.
SFW
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1246
Joined: 11 Sep 2009, 11:04

Re: andre ward still not rated by THE RING. WTF ? *

Post by SFW »

Froch didn't win 5 rounds though, that's pure fantasy and horrible scoring
tiny_acres
Middleweight
Posts: 9468
Joined: 17 Feb 2014, 14:43

Re: andre ward still not rated by THE RING. WTF ? *

Post by tiny_acres »

SFW wrote:Froch didn't win 5 rounds though, that's pure fantasy and horrible scoring
That is the truth.I could not find 5 rounds if I had to :TU:
hurricanemitch14
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 828
Joined: 13 Apr 2004, 02:35

Re: andre ward still not rated by THE RING. WTF ? *

Post by hurricanemitch14 »

ikorolev wrote:
hurricanemitch14 wrote:Nah no hate but its a new thread.....give em time.
I actually already see anti-European hate in this thread:
Froch,Kessler and AA combined won about 4 rds.
According to 2 out of 3 judges in NJ, Froch alone won 5 rounds.
Im not hating on Euros.....i do remember all the talk about AA and Paul Smith back when they fought. Goin back n forth over who won. I didnt watch either fight so i dont know who should have won. I do remember everyone being cool with AA defending his title against Smith not once but twice. I point out Euros bc i know Americans dont care about AA.
SNG
Super Middleweight
Posts: 4703
Joined: 22 May 2013, 21:02

Re: andre ward still not rated by THE RING. WTF ? *

Post by SNG »

hurricanemitch14 wrote:His opponent was good enough for u Euros when AA fought against him. Haters can play games and leave him out. Wont change the fact that he'll dominate his opponents just like old times.

Froch,Kessler and AA combined won about 4 rds.
Right, where should he be ranked after not fighting at 168 for two years and fighting at 175 against a fighter never ranked there?
hurricanemitch14
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 828
Joined: 13 Apr 2004, 02:35

Re: andre ward still not rated by THE RING. WTF ? *

Post by hurricanemitch14 »

I think common sense applies. Hes either 1 or 2 at 175 and 1 at 168. Pick one...... I bet Mikey Garcia dont have to go thru this shit when he comes back.
ikorolev
Middleweight
Posts: 4895
Joined: 21 Sep 2013, 19:08

Re: andre ward still not rated by THE RING. WTF ? *

Post by ikorolev »

No way he is #1 or even #2 at 175 until he actually beats some top 10 light heavies.
hurricanemitch14
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 828
Joined: 13 Apr 2004, 02:35

Re: andre ward still not rated by THE RING. WTF ? *

Post by hurricanemitch14 »

Yea ok GGG is the G.O.A.T......ikorolev.
Bard of Boxrec
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13113
Joined: 22 Feb 2002, 20:00

Re: andre ward still not rated by THE RING. WTF ? *

Post by Bard of Boxrec »

hurricanemitch14 wrote: I do remember everyone being cool with AA defending his title against Smith not once but twice.
Hmmm. I don't. But even if they were, why on earth would people hold a shot Abraham to the same standards as Ward?
world ranked
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2199
Joined: 21 Jan 2008, 14:21

Re: andre ward still not rated by THE RING. WTF ? *

Post by world ranked »

Riddick Blowe wrote:
hurricanemitch14 wrote: I do remember everyone being cool with AA defending his title against Smith not once but twice.
Hmmm. I don't. But even if they were, why on earth would people hold a shot Abraham to the same standards as Ward?
Where would they rank him and then does Smith win warrant a ranking at 175. Typical case of resume vs eyes.
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: andre ward still not rated by THE RING. WTF ? *

Post by crusader »

hurricanemitch14 wrote:
ikorolev wrote:
hurricanemitch14 wrote:Nah no hate but its a new thread.....give em time.
I actually already see anti-European hate in this thread:
Froch,Kessler and AA combined won about 4 rds.
According to 2 out of 3 judges in NJ, Froch alone won 5 rounds.
Im not hating on Euros.....i do remember all the talk about AA and Paul Smith back when they fought. Goin back n forth over who won. I didnt watch either fight so i dont know who should have won. I do remember everyone being cool with AA defending his title against Smith not once but twice. I point out Euros bc i know Americans dont care about AA.
Smith was widely considered a soft choice for AA and I think it's generally recognized that AA's been fighting a lot of weak opponents for a while now---I don't think there was as much of an uproar because people simply don't take him as seriously and therefore don't care as much about his opposition. I mean, why the hell should people hold AA and a P4P elite fighter like Ward to the same standards?

Ward is definitely given a hard time by some people, but you cry Euro too much.
ikorolev
Middleweight
Posts: 4895
Joined: 21 Sep 2013, 19:08

Re: andre ward still not rated by THE RING. WTF ? *

Post by ikorolev »

hurricanemitch14 wrote:Yea ok GGG is the G.O.A.T......ikorolev.
What does it have to do with GGG ?
Taansend
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11894
Joined: 10 Jul 2004, 17:38

Re: andre ward still not rated by THE RING. WTF ? *

Post by Taansend »

I want what Hurricane Mitch is on.

Reality can be so irksome.
hurricanemitch14
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 828
Joined: 13 Apr 2004, 02:35

Re: andre ward still not rated by THE RING. WTF ? *

Post by hurricanemitch14 »

I dont think its crazy to rank Andre Ward at either 175 or 168 when we know hes p4p top 5. To leave him out of the top 10 is retarded now that he has fought.
ikorolev
Middleweight
Posts: 4895
Joined: 21 Sep 2013, 19:08

Re: andre ward still not rated by THE RING. WTF ? *

Post by ikorolev »

Ward being really good at 168 doesn't automatically mean success at 175. At the lower weight, beside having advantage in hand speed, footwork, head movement, etc. over fighters like Froch, Kessler, Abraham, he also dominated them in clinching/wrestling competitions tiring them and not allowing to land anything significant. He will certainly not be able to do that against Beterbiev or other strong LHWs, so he still needs to prove that he belongs to LHW elite.
Post Reply