A 21-10 fighter is #1... Vetyeka #2... Montiel, a potential HOFer but is way past his prime.. sniffing the Top 10?
Is this suddenly a stop gap division?
Does 126 seem weak, or is it just me?
Re: Does 126 seem weak, or is it just me?
So I take you have not heard of Lomachenko, Selby, Santa Cruz, Mares, Russel Jr, Gradovich. Do you watch boxing at all or you simply scroll through boxrec ratings?JCS wrote:A 21-10 fighter is #1... Vetyeka #2... Montiel, a potential HOFer but is way past his prime.. sniffing the Top 10?
Is this suddenly a stop gap division?
Re: Does 126 seem weak, or is it just me?
Tarkus wrote:So I take you have not heard of Lomachenko, Selby, Santa Cruz, Mares, Russel Jr, Gradovich. Do you watch boxing at all or you simply scroll through boxrec ratings?JCS wrote:A 21-10 fighter is #1... Vetyeka #2... Montiel, a potential HOFer but is way past his prime.. sniffing the Top 10?
Is this suddenly a stop gap division?
If Rigo is added to that group assuming he moves up, I would say it is a pretty soliid weight for a lower weight class.
Re: Does 126 seem weak, or is it just me?
If Rigo is added to that group assuming he moves up, I would say it is a pretty soliid weight for a lower weight class.[/quote]Badhusker wrote: Lomachenko, Selby, Santa Cruz, Mares, Russel Jr, Gradovich.
Rigo wont move up, but both Quigg and Frampton hinted they are considering it. Which would make featherweight one of the best divisions, probably on of the top three.
Re: Does 126 seem weak, or is it just me?
Rigo isn't there yet. Neither is Santa Cruz (technically). Russell already proved he's inferior to Lomachenko. Mares lost to old Gonzalez... who is going to 130 himself I believe. Still not impressed.Tarkus wrote:So I take you have not heard of Lomachenko, Selby, Santa Cruz, Mares, Russel Jr, Gradovich. Do you watch boxing at all or you simply scroll through boxrec ratings?JCS wrote:A 21-10 fighter is #1... Vetyeka #2... Montiel, a potential HOFer but is way past his prime.. sniffing the Top 10?
Is this suddenly a stop gap division?
If it gets Rigo, Santa Cruz and Frampton.. then it would be something to talk about.
Re: Does 126 seem weak, or is it just me?
Why is Robinson Castellanos rated No. 1 by BoxRec?
-
keithmoonhangover
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 16895
- Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42
Re: Does 126 seem weak, or is it just me?
Why is Andy Lee British?Horse wrote:Why is Robinson Castellanos rated No. 1 by BoxRec?
Re: Does 126 seem weak, or is it just me?
Stop responding to my posts, you sad troll.keithmoonhangover wrote:Why is Andy Lee British?
-
Boxerbeetle
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 32795
- Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59
Re: Does 126 seem weak, or is it just me?
Horse wrote:Stop responding to my posts, you sad troll.keithmoonhangover wrote:Why is Andy Lee British?
-
keithmoonhangover
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 16895
- Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42
Re: Does 126 seem weak, or is it just me?
Boxerbeetle wrote:Horse wrote:Stop responding to my posts, you sad troll.keithmoonhangover wrote:Why is Andy Lee British?
Re: Does 126 seem weak, or is it just me?
How has Santa Cruz not moved up "technically" when he officially announced it while ago, he already had one fight in the division and has second fight scheduled. What more should he do, tattoo it on his forehead?
Re: Does 126 seem weak, or is it just me?
I don't consider a guy to be in a division unless he weighs in at the full limit more than once. These guys jump around far too much these days in the lower weights, what with divisions only a few pounds apart...Tarkus wrote:How has Santa Cruz not moved up "technically" when he officially announced it while ago, he already had one fight in the division and has second fight scheduled. What more should he do, tattoo it on his forehead?
You seem to have an attitude -- relax your face.