If you could change one rule of boxing....
-
handsofstone
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 23234
- Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 17:28
Re: If you could change one rule of boxing....
2 minute rounds should be scrapped,there rare but I've seen a few at the shows up here
Re: If you could change one rule of boxing....
It also seems to me that if the house fighter wants to work inside then it's allowed. If the house boxer wants to peck from distance and "tie" his man up on the inside then it is allowed.reggaereggae wrote:
You can still work inside if holding is outlawed. There is no real need for holding in boxing, it's spoiling.
Boxing without holding would be more entertaining, casual fans always remark "I wish they would stop hugging". There's no skill in it and it ruins the flow.
It also winds me up that when some guys hug they are spoiling...when other guys "tie" the up on the inside it's considered to be good boxing.
It ruins the sport.
Re: If you could change one rule of boxing....
Allow biting and pulling hair !

Re: If you could change one rule of boxing....
Seriously...
I can handle the OCCASIONAL 'interim' champ, I don't even mind 4 belts - as long as the have some sort of unification schedule - BUT Super and "Regular" champ is just the biggest pile of @#$% !
How THE **** is Scott Quigg "regular" champ !?
No disrespect to him, but Rigondeaux is the WBA champ - you can't have a belt for being good and in the top 10.
I HAATE any 'regular' champ.

I can handle the OCCASIONAL 'interim' champ, I don't even mind 4 belts - as long as the have some sort of unification schedule - BUT Super and "Regular" champ is just the biggest pile of @#$% !
How THE **** is Scott Quigg "regular" champ !?
No disrespect to him, but Rigondeaux is the WBA champ - you can't have a belt for being good and in the top 10.
I HAATE any 'regular' champ.
Re: If you could change one rule of boxing....
Surely you should hate the WBA not the fighter.skanksta wrote:Seriously...
I can handle the OCCASIONAL 'interim' champ, I don't even mind 4 belts - as long as the have some sort of unification schedule - BUT Super and "Regular" champ is just the biggest pile of @#$% !
How THE **** is Scott Quigg "regular" champ !?
No disrespect to him, but Rigondeaux is the WBA champ - you can't have a belt for being good and in the top 10.
I HAATE any 'regular' champ.
Re: If you could change one rule of boxing....
danamba7 wrote:Surely you should hate the WBA not the fighter.skanksta wrote:Seriously...
I can handle the OCCASIONAL 'interim' champ, I don't even mind 4 belts - as long as the have some sort of unification schedule - BUT Super and "Regular" champ is just the biggest pile of @#$% !
How THE **** is Scott Quigg "regular" champ !?
No disrespect to him, but Rigondeaux is the WBA champ - you can't have a belt for being good and in the top 10.
I HAATE any 'regular' champ.
You're exactly right - I HATE the WBA and the "Regular" belt - nothing against the boxers.
Re: If you could change one rule of boxing....
Not a rule but get rid if massive shorts and belly pads taking up half the boxer's body.
Re: If you could change one rule of boxing....
All ring card girls should be naked.
-
reggaereggae
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 4723
- Joined: 21 Dec 2009, 17:01
Re: If you could change one rule of boxing....
I think that there should definitely be a rule - and checked out before the fight, that Eg the belly button must be visible or something. Some of these guys have the protector so high that it makes body punching virtually obsoleteazzman wrote:Not a rule but get rid if massive shorts and belly pads taking up half the boxer's body.
-
jamesmcdonnell
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 45238
- Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11
Re: If you could change one rule of boxing....
Yeah, I remember Eubank, his shorts were almost under his chin he wore them so high.reggaereggae wrote:I think that there should definitely be a rule - and checked out before the fight, that Eg the belly button must be visible or something. Some of these guys have the protector so high that it makes body punching virtually obsoleteazzman wrote:Not a rule but get rid if massive shorts and belly pads taking up half the boxer's body.
-
jamesmcdonnell
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 45238
- Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11
Re: If you could change one rule of boxing....
I disagree, it's an art when done properly, but unfortunately, far too much flagrant tieing the opponent up and not working in the clinches is done.Ezzard wrote:It also seems to me that if the house fighter wants to work inside then it's allowed. If the house boxer wants to peck from distance and "tie" his man up on the inside then it is allowed.reggaereggae wrote:
You can still work inside if holding is outlawed. There is no real need for holding in boxing, it's spoiling.
Boxing without holding would be more entertaining, casual fans always remark "I wish they would stop hugging". There's no skill in it and it ruins the flow.
It also winds me up that when some guys hug they are spoiling...when other guys "tie" the up on the inside it's considered to be good boxing.
It ruins the sport.
Referees need to be far more strict - that's the only way it will change.