Marciano: Was the 49-0 record bogus?

nobleart1978
Super Welterweight
Posts: 722
Joined: 25 Jun 2015, 16:18

Marciano: Was the 49-0 record bogus?

Post by nobleart1978 »

I have recently watched the Larry Holmes v Carl Williams fight from 1985.

Before the fight, in an interview when asked about equalling Rocky's 49 and 0 record, Larry says that he's not that bothered because Marciano's record is fake and that it is common knowledge that he fought his brothers on numerous ocasions who used different names.

Can anyone shed any light on this?
bennie
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 15244
Joined: 15 Nov 2002, 09:53

Re: Marciano: Was the 49-0 record bogus?

Post by bennie »

Larry is one of the greatest heavies of all time but had a sour approach to the sport and often steered what should have been a casual quote down the path of something more sickening. This is just one of too many examples.
Sklar
Middleweight
Posts: 5680
Joined: 21 Sep 2013, 09:06

Re: Marciano: Was the 49-0 record bogus?

Post by Sklar »

bennie wrote:Larry is one of the greatest heavies of all time but had a sour approach to the sport and often steered what should have been a casual quote down the path of something more sickening. This is just one of too many examples.
bennie, do you have any info on one of the Rock's early victims, Jimmy Weeks? Any biographical info and, in particular, photos would be great. I've read several times over the years that Rocky did box his brother Sonny in at least one amateur exhibition where Sonny used a nom de guerre, but in the pros the only opponent I've ever had my doubts about is Weeks.
bigjack
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Marciano: Was the 49-0 record bogus?

Post by bigjack »

bennie wrote:Larry is one of the greatest heavies of all time but had a sour approach to the sport and often steered what should have been a casual quote down the path of something more sickening. This is just one of too many examples.

Holmes is my number 1 all time favourite fighter and i got the chance to see him fight,although well past his best,he still put up a decent show against Holyfield.I think he was affected by the whole Cooney, white versus black thing leading up to their classic fight and having suffered severe hardship as a child and having to fight his way through tough contenders to get his chance against Norton,then along comes cooney and he's getting the same pay as the champ,that wouldn't have helped,he also wouldn't sign his autograph for me,still i'd still clean his boots for him,the man was an awesome champion.
jamesmcdonnell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 45238
Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11

Re: Marciano: Was the 49-0 record bogus?

Post by jamesmcdonnell »

I think Larry always felt he didn't get the respect he deserved, because he was the guy who followed Ali.

I can imagine how that might make you a bit sour.
jamesmcdonnell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 45238
Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11

Re: Marciano: Was the 49-0 record bogus?

Post by jamesmcdonnell »

thecrab wrote:
jamesmcdonnell wrote:I think Larry always felt he didn't get the respect he deserved, because he was the guy who followed Ali.

I can imagine how that might make you a bit sour.
hey my pommy mate....u dont have to be belligerant to everyone that dont support your ignorant comments!
This is a forum and u might just learn from more intelligent and objective posters.
so be nice and lighten up fella :DD
How is that belligerent?

I'm just saying that Larry didn't get the respect his career deserved, and that it soured his outlook on the sport - it's pretty well documented how kranky Larry was during his career!
jamesmcdonnell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 45238
Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11

Re: Marciano: Was the 49-0 record bogus?

Post by jamesmcdonnell »

Right, it's clear to me that you're just a twat and a wind up merchant. Thanks Christ for the block function so I don't have to read your drivel.
Terminator666
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1665
Joined: 06 Nov 2007, 10:18

Re: Marciano: Was the 49-0 record bogus?

Post by Terminator666 »

Larry was known for being bitter, had a bit of a chip on his shoulder
punchoutsb
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5842
Joined: 16 Sep 2009, 01:05

Re: Marciano: Was the 49-0 record bogus?

Post by punchoutsb »

thecrab wrote:
jamesmcdonnell wrote:Right, it's clear to me that you're just a twat and a wind up merchant. Thanks Christ for the block function so I don't have to read your drivel.
U believe in CHRIST???...typical pommie...try thinking for yourself u tosser
Another "try thinking for yourself" crowd following pseudo-intellectual atheist nut bag.
magwitch
Middleweight
Posts: 4753
Joined: 30 Jun 2014, 20:04

Re: Marciano: Was the 49-0 record bogus?

Post by magwitch »

new name, same familiar tone :>
jamesmcdonnell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 45238
Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11

Re: Marciano: Was the 49-0 record bogus?

Post by jamesmcdonnell »

magwitch wrote:new name, same familiar tone :>
sorry, is this some prick who has been banned previously?
magwitch
Middleweight
Posts: 4753
Joined: 30 Jun 2014, 20:04

Re: Marciano: Was the 49-0 record bogus?

Post by magwitch »

bigjack wrote:
bennie wrote:Larry is one of the greatest heavies of all time but had a sour approach to the sport and often steered what should have been a casual quote down the path of something more sickening. This is just one of too many examples.

Holmes is my number 1 all time favourite fighter and i got the chance to see him fight,although well past his best,he still put up a decent show against Holyfield.I think he was affected by the whole Cooney, white versus black thing leading up to their classic fight and having suffered severe hardship as a child and having to fight his way through tough contenders to get his chance against Norton,then along comes cooney and he's getting the same pay as the champ,that wouldn't have helped,he also wouldn't sign his autograph for me,still i'd still clean his boots for him,the man was an awesome champion.
Did Larry give you a reason for not signing your book mate? Sounds like a strange one to turn down to me does that, given that you've gone and bought a book about him :-?
I didn't know Holmes was brought up in hardship. Yes, a very good heavyweight by what I've heard/ read.
magwitch
Middleweight
Posts: 4753
Joined: 30 Jun 2014, 20:04

Re: Marciano: Was the 49-0 record bogus?

Post by magwitch »

jamesmcdonnell wrote:
magwitch wrote:new name, same familiar tone :>
sorry, is this some prick who has been banned previously?
sounds like my old friend from down under. Pops up from nowhere and just picks some randomer to be rude to.
jamesmcdonnell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 45238
Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11

Re: Marciano: Was the 49-0 record bogus?

Post by jamesmcdonnell »

magwitch wrote:
jamesmcdonnell wrote:
magwitch wrote:new name, same familiar tone :>
sorry, is this some prick who has been banned previously?
sounds like my old friend from down under. Pops up from nowhere and just picks some randomer to be rude to.
Snore.
bigjack
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Marciano: Was the 49-0 record bogus?

Post by bigjack »

magwitch wrote:
bigjack wrote:
bennie wrote:Larry is one of the greatest heavies of all time but had a sour approach to the sport and often steered what should have been a casual quote down the path of something more sickening. This is just one of too many examples.

Holmes is my number 1 all time favourite fighter and i got the chance to see him fight,although well past his best,he still put up a decent show against Holyfield.I think he was affected by the whole Cooney, white versus black thing leading up to their classic fight and having suffered severe hardship as a child and having to fight his way through tough contenders to get his chance against Norton,then along comes cooney and he's getting the same pay as the champ,that wouldn't have helped,he also wouldn't sign his autograph for me,still i'd still clean his boots for him,the man was an awesome champion.
Did Larry give you a reason for not signing your book mate? Sounds like a strange one to turn down to me does that, given that you've gone and bought a book about him :-?
I didn't know Holmes was brought up in hardship. Yes, a very good heavyweight by what I've heard/ read.



Holmes was in a band,singer i believe and he was selling tapes of his music,he said he would only sign his name in my autograph book if i bought one of the tapes,which i refused,so he refused lol,still worship the man though,what a heart,what a chin,and arguably one of the best jabs ever :bow: .
jamesmcdonnell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 45238
Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11

Re: Marciano: Was the 49-0 record bogus?

Post by jamesmcdonnell »

Certainly the best jab of any heavyweight champ - rapid, accurate, and deployed with withering regularity.
Counter-puncher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 39141
Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41

Re: Marciano: Was the 49-0 record bogus?

Post by Counter-puncher »

thecrab wrote:
jamesmcdonnell wrote:I think Larry always felt he didn't get the respect he deserved, because he was the guy who followed Ali.

I can imagine how that might make you a bit sour.
hey my pommy mate....u dont have to be belligerant to everyone that dont support your ignorant comments!
This is a forum and u might just learn from more intelligent and objective posters.
so be nice and lighten up fella :DD
What in gods name are you on about, you halfwitted incomprehensible antipodean loon?
Rexob
Middleweight
Posts: 6025
Joined: 20 Mar 2014, 15:17

Re: Marciano: Was the 49-0 record bogus?

Post by Rexob »

Counter-puncher wrote:
thecrab wrote:
jamesmcdonnell wrote:I think Larry always felt he didn't get the respect he deserved, because he was the guy who followed Ali.

I can imagine how that might make you a bit sour.
hey my pommy mate....u dont have to be belligerant to everyone that dont support your ignorant comments!
This is a forum and u might just learn from more intelligent and objective posters.
so be nice and lighten up fella :DD
What in gods name are you on about, you halfwitted incomprehensible antipodean loon?
:lol:
bigjack
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Marciano: Was the 49-0 record bogus?

Post by bigjack »

jamesmcdonnell wrote:Certainly the best jab of any heavyweight champ - rapid, accurate, and deployed with withering regularity.

Can't remember who said it,one of Holmes's former victims i think,but they described Holmes's jab as like being hit with a broom handle with broken glass on the end.
palooka
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 15698
Joined: 20 Jan 2012, 15:31

Re: Marciano: Was the 49-0 record bogus?

Post by palooka »

bigjack wrote:
jamesmcdonnell wrote:Certainly the best jab of any heavyweight champ - rapid, accurate, and deployed with withering regularity.

Can't remember who said it,one of Holmes's former victims i think,but they described Holmes's jab as like being hit with a broom handle with broken glass on the end.
Peter Buckley said much the same about Duke McKenzie's jab.
ShadrachSimmo
Cruiserweight
Posts: 4738
Joined: 20 Oct 2010, 05:42

Re: Marciano: Was the 49-0 record bogus?

Post by ShadrachSimmo »

magwitch wrote:
bigjack wrote:
bennie wrote:Larry is one of the greatest heavies of all time but had a sour approach to the sport and often steered what should have been a casual quote down the path of something more sickening. This is just one of too many examples.

Holmes is my number 1 all time favourite fighter and i got the chance to see him fight,although well past his best,he still put up a decent show against Holyfield.I think he was affected by the whole Cooney, white versus black thing leading up to their classic fight and having suffered severe hardship as a child and having to fight his way through tough contenders to get his chance against Norton,then along comes cooney and he's getting the same pay as the champ,that wouldn't have helped,he also wouldn't sign his autograph for me,still i'd still clean his boots for him,the man was an awesome champion.
Did Larry give you a reason for not signing your book mate? Sounds like a strange one to turn down to me does that, given that you've gone and bought a book about him :-?
I didn't know Holmes was brought up in hardship. Yes, a very good heavyweight by what I've heard/ read.
I bet if He offered to pay for it he'd have signed it no problem.
Coco
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 28521
Joined: 08 May 2007, 05:42

Re: Marciano: Was the 49-0 record bogus?

Post by Coco »

Id bet on a prime Holmes v a prime Tyson.
jamesmcdonnell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 45238
Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11

Re: Marciano: Was the 49-0 record bogus?

Post by jamesmcdonnell »

Possibly, but I reckon he'd have had to survive some scary moments in the first 4 rounds.
bigjack
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Marciano: Was the 49-0 record bogus?

Post by bigjack »

Coco wrote:Id bet on a prime Holmes v a prime Tyson.

No doubt in my mind Holmes would have jabbed him silly.
magwitch
Middleweight
Posts: 4753
Joined: 30 Jun 2014, 20:04

Re: Marciano: Was the 49-0 record bogus?

Post by magwitch »

bit of an athlete was Holmes wasn't he. More than just a jab - but the jab counted for a lot. Yeah, with his height too and his confidence in his ability I could have seen a prime Holmes beating a prime Tyson. Would require a cool head that job.
Locked